The Role of Nurse in the Multidisciplinary Management of Cancer Cachexia

Management of cancer cachexia towards optimizing care delivery and patient outcomes

Cancer cachexia is a complex syndrome characterized by progressive weight loss, muscle mass depletion, and systemic inflammation, profoundly affecting the well-being and treatment outcomes of cancer patients. Effective management of cancer cachexia demands a coordinated, multifaceted approach involving various healthcare disciplines and operational strategies. Streamlining care processes is crucial to ensure timely interventions and support, reducing delays in diagnosis and treatment initiation. Multidisciplinary collaboration is pivotal in creating integrated care plans that address the multifactorial nature of cancer cachexia comprehensively. Data-driven decision-making empowers healthcare teams to identify trends, monitor treatment responses, and tailor care plans to individual needs, ultimately leading to improved patient outcomes. Standardized assessment and monitoring play a vital role in maintaining consistent, high-quality care, facilitating early interventions and treatment adjustments. Implementing patient-centered care fosters trust, enhances treatment adherence, and encourages patients to actively engage in their care journey, thereby improving their overall quality of life. This paper underscores the significance of applying operations management principles to optimize care delivery and enhance patient outcomes in the management of cancer cachexia. It provides valuable insights for healthcare institutions and professionals striving to provide comprehensive and effective care for individuals affected by this challenging condition.

The Incidence and Management of Cancer-Related Anorexia During Treatment with Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors

Cancer-related anorexia is a common complication and frequently occurs in cancer patients treated with vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (VEGFR-TKIs). Anorexia contributes to malnutrition, body weight loss, and cachexia in affected patients. Furthermore, patients who experience anorexia have worse outcomes than those who maintain their appetite, highlighting the importance of managing anorexia and related symptoms. However, as the causes of anorexia are both diverse and interconnected, there have been challenges in evaluating and implementing effective interventions. In this review, we described the contributing factors to cancer-related anorexia and reviewed recent literature for the frequency of anorexia symptoms in patients treated with VEGFR-TKIs. Additionally, we evaluated the evidence for current interventions and the potential benefits of multimodal and multidisciplinary approaches to care. The frequency of anorexia symptoms in patients who received VEGFR-TKIs ranged from 14%-58% for all-grade anorexia and 0%-6% for grade 3 or 4 anorexia. While many of the interventions for cancer-related anorexia have minimal benefit or adverse events, recent advances in our understanding of cancer-related anorexia suggest that multimodal therapy with multidisciplinary care is a promising avenue of investigation. Several studies currently underway are anticipated to further assess the effectiveness of multimodal approaches.

The clinical effect evaluation of multidisciplinary collaborative team combined with palliative care model in patients with terminal cancer: a randomised controlled study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical effect of a multidisciplinary collaboration team combined with a palliative care model in patients with terminal cancer.

METHOD

A total of 84 patients diagnosed with terminal cancer in our hospital were included and randomly divided into an intervention group and a control group, with 42 cases in each group. Patients in the intervention group were treated by a multidisciplinary collaborative team combined with the palliative care model, and patients in the control group were treated by routine nursing intervention. The Self-rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) and the Self-rating Depression Scale (SDS) were used to evaluate negative emotions and anxiety and depression of patients before and after intervention. The Quality of Life Scale (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer [EORTC] QLQ-C30) and Social Support Scale (SSRS) were used to evaluate the quality of life and social support of patients. This study has been registered in 13/01/2023 (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05683236).

RESULT

The general data of the two groups were comparable. After intervention, the SAS (43.7 ± 7.4 vs. 54.2 ± 9.3) and SDS scores (38.4 ± 6.5 vs. 53.1 ± 8.4) of the intervention group were significantly lower than those of the control group. The total SSRS score, subjective support score, objective support score and utilisation of support of the intervention group were significantly higher than those of the control group (P < 0.05). The overall quality of life score of the intervention group was higher than that of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (79.5 ± 4.5 vs. 73.2 ± 3.6, P < 0.05). The scores of each functional scale were significantly higher than those of the control group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Compared with conventional nursing, the application of the multidisciplinary collaborative team combined with tranquilisation therapy in patients with terminal cancer can significantly reduce the anxiety and depression of patients, enable patients to obtain comprehensive social support, and effectively improve the quality of life of patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT05683236, 13/01/2023, Retrospectively registered.

Nutrition care is an integral part of patient-centred medical care: a European consensus

While healthcare is becoming more patient-centred, evidence-based nutrition interventions are still not accessible to all patients with cancer. As nutrition interventions directly improve clinical and socioeconomic outcomes, patient-centred care is not complete without nutrition care. While awareness of the negative impact of malnutrition on clinical outcomes, quality of life, and functional and emotional wellbeing in cancer is growing, there is relatively poor awareness amongst patients, clinicians, policymakers, and payers that nutrition interventions -particularly those begun in the early stages of the disease course- are an effective method for improving such outcomes. The European Beating Cancer Plan recognises the need for a holistic approach to cancer but lacks actionable recommendations to implement integrated nutrition cancer care at member state level. When considering nutrition care as a human right, the impact on quality of life and functional status must be prioritized, as these may be equally as important to patients, especially in advanced cancer where improvements in clinical outcomes such as survival or tumour burden may not be attainable. We formulate actions needed at the regional and the European level to ensure integrated nutrition care for all patients with cancer. The 4 main Take Home Messages are as follows: 1. The goals of Europe's Beating Cancer Plan cannot be achieved without integrating nutrition across the cancer care continuum. 2. Malnutrition negatively impacts clinical outcomes and has socioeconomic consequences for patients and healthcare systems. 3. Championing integrating nutrition care into cancer care is therefore the duty and ethical responsibility of clinicians (Hippocratic Oath-primum non nocere) and 4. Nutrition care is a cost effective, evidence-based therapy.

Multidisciplinary Management of Children with Occult Spinal Dysraphism: A Comprehensive Journey from Birth to Adulthood

Occult spinal dysraphism (OSD) comprises different forms of failure in embryogenic development that can lead to genitourinary, spinal, or lower limb alterations, thus determining progressive neurological deterioration. The correct management of children harboring OSD represents a significant issue during their life up to adulthood. However, patients often have to entertain individual consultations with each specialist. We settled on a multidisciplinary team comprising pediatric neurosurgeons, urologists, neurologists, orthopedists, and other supporting physicians. We present the results of such actions by analyzing a series of 141 children with OSD subjected to neurosurgical procedures, evaluating the impact of multidisciplinary management on outcomes. We also evaluated the specific actions according to the different ages of OSD patients from birth to adulthood to provide a schematic plan that could represent a basis for establishing and disseminating the need for a multidisciplinary approach in OSD management. The multidisciplinary team allows all consultants to see the patient together, covering specific aspects of history and examination pertinent to their management. Offering a one-stop service prevents coordination issues between the different medical teams, avoids delays or cancellations of the various appointments, optimizes cost-effectiveness, and improves efficiency and parents’ satisfaction.

Factors Affecting the Assessment of Cancer Cachexia by Nurses Caring for Patients with Advanced Cancer Undergoing Chemotherapy: A Cross-Sectional Survey

Objective

This study aimed to identify the awareness, knowledge, and assessment of cancer cachexia among nurses who cared for patients with advanced cancer undergoing chemotherapy. In addition, we identified the factors that affected their assessments.

Methods

A cross-sectional survey was conducted among nurses who cared for patients with advanced cancer undergoing chemotherapy at designated cancer care hospitals and regional cancer care cooperation hospitals between June and September 2020. We applied Bandura's triadic reciprocal causation as the research framework. The questionnaire consisted of questions on awareness, knowledge, and assessment of cancer cachexia. Single and multiple regression analyses were conducted on the relationship between each variable and the number of assessment items.

Results

Questionnaires were sent to 1026 nurses, 403 of whom responded (response rate: 39.3%). Among these, 299 responses were valid, being a 74.1% valid response rate. The average age was 39.74 ​± ​9.65 years and the mean work experience as a nurse was 16.50 ​± ​9.14 years. In respect of the awareness of cancer cachexia, 93.3% of the participants answered “assessment of cancer cachexia was needed,” and 75.2% answered “a nurse's role includes assessing for cancer cachexia.” Only 15.4% responded positively regarding “confidence in the assessment of cancer cachexia.” Regarding knowledge of cancer cachexia, the percentage of correct answers to questions about the definition of cachexia and diagnostic criteria ranged from 45.5% to 53.8%. With regard to cancer cachexia assessments, the participants assessed “weight loss or rate of weight loss (56.9%),” “symptoms affecting nutritional status (54.2%),” and “anorexia (46.2%).” Factors affecting the assessment of cancer cachexia were higher knowledge scores on cancer cachexia (P ​= ​0.039), routine assessment of cancer cachexia (P ​< ​0.001), experiences of participating in in-hospital training on cancer cachexia (P ​= ​0.027), and collaborating with physical/occupational therapists in the nutritional management of patients (P ​= ​0.025).

Conclusions

Nurses held the view that their role required them to assess for cancer cachexia, but they did not feel confident in doing so. In addition, they lacked knowledge of reversible “cancer cachexia;” hence, the assessments were not routinely completed. Education on these topics and the development and standardization of tools to assess or collaborate with other professions are required.