Diagnostic Value of Extraoral Periapical Radiograph in Comparison to Intraoral Periapical Radiograph: A Cross-sectional, Institutional Study

Estimation of Surface Radiation Dosage to Thyroid Gland and Lower Abdomen While Using Intraoral Periapical Radiography: A Phantom Study

Background and objective

Every dose of radiation has the potential to cause biological harm. Quantitative assessment of radiation doses to radiosensitive organs can aid dental professionals in taking the appropriate protective measures against radiation. This data may also be used among the general public to alleviate fears of radiation exposure in dental radiography. This study aimed to estimate the surface radiation dose at the level of the thyroid and lower abdomen during intraoral periapical radiography (IOPAR).

Materials and methods

A total of 80 calcium sulfate (CaSO₄) discs were utilized in this cross-sectional in vitro study to estimate the surface radiation dose at the level of thyroid and lower abdomen on a phantom model while using an IOPAR. After exposure, the discs were submitted to the Radiation Laboratory's "Personnel Monitoring Service" to measure the surface radiation dose. Mean and standard deviations were calculated using descriptive statistics for continuous variables. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare bi-variate samples of independent groups. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS Statistics version 21.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY).

Results

The results showed a statistically significant difference in radiation exposure between the maxillary anterior and mandibular anterior regions when the thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD) was placed in the lower abdomen (p=0.000). When the maxillary and mandibular posterior regions were compared, there was a statistically significant difference in radiation exposure when the TLD was placed in the lower abdomen (p=0.000).

Conclusion

When the cone was positioned in the maxillary region, there was an increase in surface radiation dosage to the lower abdomen and thyroid.

Clinical and Radiographic Assessment of Cases Referred to Endodontic Surgery

Objective

The objective of the study was to assess the quality of root canal fillings of cases referred to endodontic surgery using preoperative radiographs and correlate it with endodontic surgery treatment decision. The objective was also to analyse clinical symptoms and size of periapical lesions on radiographs and correlate them with treatment decisions including non-surgical retreatment, endodontic surgery and extraction.

Materials and Methods

A questionnaire was composed to record the data. Eighty-six patients with 109 teeth, who were referred to endodontic surgery, participated in the research. The quality of root canal filling was assessed according to its homogeneity and filling length on digital radiographs. The data were analyzed using χ2-test and t-test.

Results

Of the teeth referred to endodontic surgery, 97.2% were treated by a general practice dentist, endodontic retreatment was attempted in 20.6%, and root canal filling was homogeneous and within 1 mm from the apex in 21.6%. Endodontic surgery, retreatment, extraction and no treatment were selected in 90.1%, 5.4%, 1.8% and 2.7% of the cases, respectively.

Conclusions

Low percentage of adequate root canal fillings and high percentage of endodontic surgery decisions suggest that there is a need to increase awareness of non-surgical retreatment options.