Diagnostic importance of CD56 with fine-needle aspiration cytology in suspected papillary thyroid carcinoma cases

Paving the path toward multi-omics approaches in the diagnostic challenges faced in thyroid pathology

INTRODUCTION

Despite advancements in diagnostic methods, the classification of indeterminate thyroid nodules still poses diagnostic challenges not only in pre-surgical evaluation but even after histological evaluation of surgical specimens. Proteomics, aided by mass spectrometry and integrated with artificial intelligence and machine learning algorithms, shows great promise in identifying diagnostic markers for thyroid lesions.

AREAS COVERED

This review provides in-depth exploration of how proteomics has contributed to the understanding of thyroid pathology. It discusses the technical advancements related to immunohistochemistry, genetic and proteomic techniques, such as mass spectrometry, which have greatly improved sensitivity and spatial resolution up to single-cell level. These improvements allowed the identification of specific protein signatures associated with different types of thyroid lesions.

EXPERT COMMENTARY

Among all the proteomics approaches, spatial proteomics stands out due to its unique ability to capture the spatial context of proteins in both cytological and tissue thyroid samples. The integration of multi-layers of molecular information combining spatial proteomics, genomics, immunohistochemistry or metabolomics and the implementation of artificial intelligence and machine learning approaches, represent hugely promising steps forward toward the possibility to uncover intricate relationships and interactions among various molecular components, providing a complete picture of the biological landscape whilst fostering thyroid nodule diagnosis.

Preoperative evaluation of thyroid nodules - Diagnosis and management strategies

Thyroid cancer is the most common endocrine malignancy, with increasing incidence over the past few decades. Fine needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy is the gold standard for preoperative diagnosis of thyroid malignancies. Nevertheless, this method renders indeterminate results in up to 30% of the cases. Therefore, these patients are often referred to unnecessary surgery to establish the diagnosis. To improve the accuracy of preoperative diagnosis, several other ways, such as ultrasonography, elastography, immunohistochemical analysis, genetic testing, and core needle biopsy, have been developed and can be used either in association with or as an alternative to FNA. This review aims to evaluate all these diagnostic tools to determine the most appropriate way of managing thyroid nodules and subsequently improve the selection of cases referred to surgery.

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis to Identify the Immunocytochemical Markers Effective in Delineating Benign from Malignant Thyroid Lesions in FNAC Samples

Conventional cytology-based diagnosis for thyroid cancer is limited with more than 30-45% of nodules categorized as indeterminate, necessitating surgery for confirming or refuting the diagnosis. This systematic review and meta-analysis were aimed at identifying immunocytochemical markers effective in delineating benign from malignant thyroid lesions in fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) samples, thereby improving the accuracy of cytology diagnosis. A systematic review of relevant articles (2000-2021) from online databases was carried out and the search protocol registered in PROSPERO database (CRD42021229121). The quality of studies was assessed using QUADAS-2. Review Manager 5.4.1 from Cochrane collaboration and MetaDisc Version 1.4 was used to conduct the meta-analysis. Bias in the studies were visually analyzed using funnel plots, and statistical significance was evaluated by Egger's test. Systematic review identified 64 original articles, while meta-analysis in eligible articles (n = 41) identified a panel of 5 markers, Galectin-3, HBME-1, CK-19, CD-56, and TPO. Assessment of the diagnostic performance revealed that Gal-3 (sensitivity: 0.81; CI: 0.79-0.83; specificity: 0.84; CI: 0.82-0.85) and HBME-1 (sensitivity: 0.83; Cl: 0.81-0.86; specificity: 0.85; CI: 0.83-0.86) showed high accuracy in delineating benign from malignant thyroid nodules. Efficacy analysis in indeterminate nodules showed Gal-3 and HBME-1 have high specificity of 0.86 (CI 0.84-0.89) and 0.82 (CI 0.78-0.86), respectively, and low sensitivity of 0.76 (CI 0.72-0.80) and 0.75 (CI 0.70-0.80), respectively. Diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of Galectin-3 and HBME-1 were 39.18 (CI 23.38-65.65) and 24.44 (CI 11.16-53.54), respectively. Significant publication bias was observed for the markers Galectin-3 and CK-19 (p < 0.05). The panel of 5 markers identified from this meta-analysis are high-confidence candidates that need to be validated in thyroid cytology to establish their efficacy and enable clinical applicability.

Emerging Biomarkers in Thyroid Practice and Research

Simple Summary

Tumor biomarkers are molecules at genetic or protein level, or certain evaluable characteristics. These help in perfecting patient management. Over the past decade, advanced and more sensitive techniques have led to the identification of many new biomarkers in the field of oncology. A knowledge of the recent developments is essential for their application to clinical practice, and furthering research. This review provides a comprehensive account of such various markers identified in thyroid carcinoma, the most common endocrine malignancy. While some of these have been brought into use in routine patient management, others are novel and need more research before clinical application.

Abstract

Thyroid cancer is the most common endocrine malignancy. Recent developments in molecular biological techniques have led to a better understanding of the pathogenesis and clinical behavior of thyroid neoplasms. This has culminated in the updating of thyroid tumor classification, including the re-categorization of existing and introduction of new entities. In this review, we discuss various molecular biomarkers possessing diagnostic, prognostic, predictive and therapeutic roles in thyroid cancer. A comprehensive account of epigenetic dysregulation, including DNA methylation, the function of various microRNAs and long non-coding RNAs, germline mutations determining familial occurrence of medullary and non-medullary thyroid carcinoma, and single nucleotide polymorphisms predisposed to thyroid tumorigenesis has been provided. In addition to novel immunohistochemical markers, including those for neuroendocrine differentiation, and next-generation immunohistochemistry (BRAF V600E, RAS, TRK, and ALK), the relevance of well-established markers, such as Ki-67, in current clinical practice has also been discussed. A tumor microenvironment (PD-L1, CD markers) and its influence in predicting responses to immunotherapy in thyroid cancer and the expanding arena of techniques, including liquid biopsy based on circulating nucleic acids and plasma-derived exosomes as a non-invasive technique for patient management, are also summarized.

Maintenance and differentiation of human ES cells on polyvinylidene fluoride scaffolds immobilized with a vitronectin-derived peptide

Polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) is biocompatible, easy to fabricate, and has piezoelectric properties; it has been used for many biomedical applications including stem cell engineering. However, long-term cultivation of human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) and their differentiation toward cardiac lineages on PVDF have not been investigated. Herein, PVDF nanoscaled membrane scaffolds were fabricated by electrospinning; a vitronectin-derived peptide-mussel adhesive protein fusion (VNm) was immobilized on the scaffolds. hESCs cultured on the VNm-coated PVDF scaffold (VNm-PVDF scaffold) were stably expanded for more than 10 passages while maintaining the expression of pluripotency markers and genomic integrity. Under cardiac differentiation conditions, hESCs on the VNm-PVDF scaffold generated more spontaneously beating colonies and showed the upregulation of cardiac-related genes, compared with those cultured on Matrigel and VNm alone. Thus, VNm-PVDF scaffolds may be suitable for the long-term culture of hESCs and their differentiation into cardiac cells, thus expanding their application in regenerative medicine.

The Usefulness of Immunocytochemistry of CD56 in Determining Malignancy from Indeterminate Thyroid Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology

BACKGROUND

Fine-needle aspiration cytology serves as a safe, economical tool in evaluating thyroid nodules. However, about 30% of the samples are categorized as indeterminate. Hence, many immunocytochemistry markers have been studied, but there has not been a single outstanding marker. We studied the efficacy of CD56 with human bone marrow endothelial cell marker-1 (HBME-1) in diagnosis in the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (TBSRTC) category III.

METHODS

We reviewed ThinPrep liquid-based cytology (LBC) samples with Papanicolaou stain from July 1 to December 31, 2016 (2,195 cases) and selected TBSRTC category III cases (n = 363). Twenty-six cases were histologically confirmed as benign (six cases, 23%) or malignant (20 cases, 77%); we stained 26 LBC slides with HBME-1 and CD56 through the cell transfer method. For evaluation of reactivity of immunocytochemistry, we chose atypical follicular cell clusters.

RESULTS

CD56 was not reactive in 18 of 20 cases (90%) of malignant nodules and showed cytoplasmic positivity in five of six cases (83%) of benign nodules. CD56 showed high sensitivity (90.0%) and relatively low specificity (83.3%) in detecting malignancy (p = .004). HBME-1 was reactive in 17 of 20 cases (85%) of malignant nodules and was not reactive in five of six cases (83%) of benign nodules. HBME-1 showed slightly lower sensitivity (85.0%) than CD56. The specificity in detecting malignancy by HBME-1 was similar to that of CD56 (83.3%, p = .008). CD56 and HBME-1 tests combined showed lower sensitivity (75.0% vs 90%) and higher specificity (93.8% vs 83.3%) in detecting malignancy compared to using CD56 alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Using CD56 alone showed relatively low specificity despite high sensitivity for detecting malignancy. Combining CD56 with HBME-1 could increase the specificity. Thus, we suggest that CD56 could be a useful preoperative marker for differential diagnosis of TBSRTC category III samples.