Autoimmune pancreatitis: Imaging features

[Imaging in chronic inflammatory bowel disease]

In patients with chronic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), endoscopic techniques (including capsule techniques and balloon enteroscopy for the small intestine), ultrasound (US), computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are primarily used as often complementary imaging techniques. Radiation exposure needs to be kept in mind when using CT and conventional X‑ray-techniques. Therefore, most importantly, ultrasound and MRI have changed the routine diagnostics of intestinal diseases. US, CT and MRI not only assess the lumen but, similarly importantly, also the wall and the surrounding structures of the gastrointestinal tract. Furthermore, functional processes can be visualized and provide important information about passage and perfusion, which is mainly true for real-time ultrasound. CT and MRI are usually carried out with the use of contrast agents as contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) and contrast-enhanced MRI (CEMRI). Ultrasound is performed conventionally or with intravascular (CEUS) and/or extravascular intracavitary contrast agent application (icCEUS). This article provides an overview of the current significance of the mentioned imaging procedures in patients with IBD and discusses the typical indications.

Contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound for differential diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis: a meta-analysis

Background and study aims To assess the diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound (CE-EUS) for autoimmune pancreatitis and other solid pancreatic masses. Patients and methods A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science was performed from inception to October 2022. We calculated individual and pooled sensitivities and specificities to determine the diagnostic ability of CE-EUS. In addition, we calculated I 2 to test for heterogeneity and explored the source of heterogeneity by meta-regression analysis. Results A total of 472 patients from seven eligible studies were included. The mean sensitivity and specificity of the Bivariate analysis were 0.84 (95% CI 0.71-0.92) and 0.95 (95% CI 0.84-0.99), respectively. The diagnostic advantage ratio was 107.91 (95% confidence interval [CI] 22.22-524.13), and the area under the summary receiver operating characteristics curve was 0.91 (95% CI 0.88-0.93). The overall heterogeneity of the studies is negligible (I 2 =0, 95% CI 0-100). However, notable heterogeneity was observed in the combined specificity ( P <0.01, I 2 =74.82) and diagnostic odds ratio ( P =0.05, I 2 =51.54). The heterogeneity in these aspects could be elucidated through sensitivity analysis. Conclusions Our analysis showed that CE-EUS is useful in identifying autoimmune pancreatitis. However, further large sample size, multicenter, prospective studies are needed to demonstrate its utility.

Research progress of ultrasound in accurate evaluation of cartilage injury in osteoarthritis

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a prevalent cause of joint algesia, loss of function, and disability in adults, with cartilage injury being its core pathological manifestation. Since cartilage damage is non-renewable, the treatment outcome in the middle and late stages of OA is unsatisfactory, which can be minimized by changing lifestyle and other treatment modalities if diagnosed and managed in the early stages, indicating the importance of early diagnosis and monitoring of cartilage injury. Ultrasound technology has been used for timely diagnosis and even cartilage injury treatment, which is convenient and safe for the patient owing to no radiation exposure. Studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of ultrasound and its various quantitative ultrasound parameters, like ultrasound roughness index (URI), reflection coefficient (R), apparent integrated backscatter (AIB), thickness, and ultrasound elastography, in the early and accurate assessment of OA cartilage pathological changes, including surface and internal tissue, hardness, and thickness. Although many challenges are faced in the clinical application of this technology in diagnosis, ultrasound and ultrasound-assisted techniques offer a lot of promise for detecting early cartilage damage in OA. In this review, we have discussed the evaluation of ultrasonic cartilage quantitative parameters for early pathological cartilage changes.

Top 100 cited articles related to EUS: A bibliometric analysis

Background and Objectives

Citation analysis is a fundamental method in bibliometrics for quantifying the impact and contribution of articles on a specific biomedical field. The purpose of our study was to identify and analyze the top 100 cited articles in the field of EUS.

Methods

All published articles in the field of EUS were searched by using "endoscopic ultrasound" and its synonyms as the search terms without time limit. The Institute for Scientific Information Web of Science Core database was searched to determine the citations. The top 100 cited articles were identified and further evaluated for characteristics including publication year, authors, journals, impact factor, countries, institutions, article type, topic term, and evidence grade, among others.

Results

A total of 430 articles were cited more than 100 times. The 100 most-cited articles were published between 1988 and 2018, and the medium citation was 240.5 (104.25). The top 100 cited articles mainly focused on diagnostic performance (80%) and interventional therapy (20%). The numbers of articles studying the diagnostic accuracy of FNA (n = 29) and tumor diagnosis (n = 29) were the highest among research articles on FNA and EUS of diagnostic categories, and EUS transluminal drainage (n = 14) was the most frequently used EUS technique for therapy. The focus of the majority of the articles was on diseases of pancreas (n = 55), and among the 55 articles related to pancreatic diseases, pancreatic cancer (n = 17) and solid pancreatic masses (n = 13) were the most researched topics. In addition, we found that the proportions of diagnostic and treatment-related articles at different time periods have statistical significance (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

Our analysis provides an insight into the top 100 articles in the field of EUS, revealing EUS-guided FNA, tumor staging, and transluminal drainage as the major advances in the past 35 years. Pancreatic diseases were the most researched, especially pancreatic cancer or solid pancreatic masses. Our research has found that the number of articles on the application of EUS treatment has significantly increased.

Transabdominal ultrasound for the diagnostic workup of parenchymal pancreatic diseases

This continuing medical education article highlights the central role of transcutaneous sonography in diagnosing parenchymal pancreatic diseases. It emphasizes the importance of in-depth knowledge of sonographic imaging of organ anatomy and a structured examination methodology, particularly for identifying acute and chronic pancreatitis and related complications. The article provides detailed guidance for optimized examination techniques and equipment settings, even under challenging conditions, and discusses the application of ultrasound in various scenarios of pancreatic diseases. Moreover, the relevance of advanced sonographic techniques such as high-frequency sonography, elastography, and contrast-enhanced sonography is illuminated in the context of expanded diagnostic workup.

The Role of Endoscopic Ultrasound and Ancillary Techniques in the Diagnosis of Autoimmune Pancreatitis: A Comprehensive Review

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is a unique form of chronic pancreatitis with a multifactorial pathogenesis. Historically, it has been classified as type 1 and type 2, according to its clinical and histological features. The diagnosis of AIP is challenging and relies on a combination of clinical, histopathologic, serologic, and imaging characteristics. In the available guidelines, the imaging hallmarks of AIP are based on cross-sectional imaging and cholangiopancreatography retrograde endoscopic findings. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is generally used for pancreatic tissue acquisition to rule out pancreatic cancer and diagnose AIP with limited accuracy. Several papers reported the reliability of EUS for providing informative morphologic features of AIP. Nowadays, the improvement in the resolution of EUS conventional images and the development of new ancillary technologies have further increased the diagnostic yield of EUS: contrast-enhanced EUS and EUS elastography are non-invasive and real-time techniques that strongly support the diagnosis and management of pancreatic diseases. In this review article, we will present the role of conventional EUS and ancillary diagnostic techniques in the diagnosis of AIP to support clinicians and endosonographers in managing this condition.

Application of artificial intelligence in pancreas endoscopic ultrasound imaging- A systematic review

The pancreas is a vital organ in digestive system which has significant health implications. It is imperative to evaluate and identify malignant pancreatic lesions promptly in light of the high mortality rate linked to such malignancies. Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS) is a non-invasive precise technique to detect pancreas disorders, but it is highly operator dependent. Artificial intelligence (AI), including traditional machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) techniques can play a pivotal role to enhancing the performance of EUS regardless of operator. AI performs a critical function in the detection, classification, and segmentation of medical images. The utilization of AI-assisted systems has improved the accuracy and productivity of pancreatic analysis, including the detection of diverse pancreatic disorders (e.g., pancreatitis, masses, and cysts) as well as landmarks and parenchyma. This systematic review examines the rapidly developing domain of AI-assisted system in EUS of the pancreas. Its objective is to present a thorough study of the present research status and developments in this area. This paper explores the significant challenges of AI-assisted system in pancreas EUS imaging, highlights the potential of AI techniques in addressing these challenges, and suggests the scope for future research in domain of AI-assisted EUS systems.

Comments and illustrations of the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine contrast-enhanced ultrasound guidelines. Rare pancreatic tumors, imaging features on transabdominal ultrasound and EUS with contrast enhancement: Rare epithelial pancreatic tumors: solid pseudopapillary neoplasm, acinar cell carcinoma, mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms, some rare subtypes of pancreatic adenocarcinoma and pancreatoblastoma

Rare malignant pancreatic lesions are systematically reported in this review. The focus is on the imaging appearance of the rare epithelial pancreatic tumors such as the solid pseudopapillary neoplasm, acinar cell carcinoma, rare subtypes of adenocarcinoma, and pancreatoblastoma as seen on ultrasound, EUS, and contrast-enhanced ultrasound or EUS. The present overview summarizes the data and shows that not every pancreatic tumor is likely to be the most common entities of ductal adenocarcinoma or neuroendocrine tumor.

Normal value of virtual touch imaging quantification elastography in measurements of pancreas

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate pancreatic tissue stiffness and provide a normal reference shear wave velocity (SWV) value of pancreas from healthy adults by Virtual Touch Imaging Quantification (VTIQ) measurements.

METHODS

Healthy adult volunteers without known history of hepatobiliary or pancreatic diseases were included. VTIQ elastography (Siemens ACUSON Sequoia, 5C-1 transducer) was used. SWV values were measured at the cephalic, corpus and tail of pancreas and replicated different operators' obtained data. Subgroups were classified according to the volunteers' gender, age, body mass index (BMI), depth of measurements and the echogenicity of the pancreas.

RESULTS

From February 2023 to July 2023, 33 healthy adult volunteers were included. The success rate of VTIQ measurements in cephalic, corpus and tail regions was 90.90 % (30/33), 96.97 % (32/33) and 90.90 % (30/33) respectively. The color elastograms of healthy adult pancreas showed uniform blue or simultaneously blue and green. The average SWV values were 0.97±0.26 m/s for cephalic, 0.91±0.24 m/s for corpus and 0.97±0.25 m/s for pancreatic tail respectively (P = 0.198). The mean SWV values of pancreas did not show significant difference with age, gender or depth (P > 0.05). BMI was an influence factor in the measurements of SWV values of cephalic and tail of pancreas (P < 0.05). Pancreas with hyperechoic parenchyma showed higher mean SWV values (P < 0.05). The intra-observer (ICC = 0.938 [95% CI: 0.869-0.971]) and the inter-observer (ICC = 0.887 [95% CI: 0.760-0.947]) agreements of VTIQ measurements were excellent.

CONCLUSIONS

The mean SWV value of the pancreas in healthy adults was 0.96±0.20 m/s (range: 0.52-1.74 m/s). VTIQ technique can be used in pancreatic stiffness measurements with good reliability.

Autoimmune pancreatitis type 2 (idiopathic duct-centric pancreatitis): A comprehensive review

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is an uncommon fibro-inflammatory disorder precipitated by autoimmune/inflammatory reactions. Currently, there are two clinical subtypes of AIP (type 1 [AIP-1] and type 2 [AIP-2]) that correspond to two histologic descriptors (lymphoplasmacytic sclerosing pancreatitis and idiopathic duct-centric pancreatitis, respectively). While our understanding of AIP-1 has evolved considerably over the years, little is known about AIP-2 due to its rarity, often leading to misdiagnosis, delayed treatment, and even unnecessary surgical resection. Compared to AIP-1, AIP-2 exhibits distinct clinical and histologic features. Because AIP-2 is a pancreas-restricted disease without a specific serum marker, the evaluation of histologic features (e.g., granulocytic epithelial lesions) is essential for an accurate diagnosis. Patients with AIP-2 respond well to glucocorticoids, with anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha antibodies as a promising alternative therapy. The prognosis of AIP-2 is generally favorable and relapse is uncommon. Here, we provide an overview of our current knowledge on the clinical features, diagnosis, therapeutic regimens, prognosis, and putative mechanisms underlying AIP-2. Notably, the diagnostic differentiation between AIP-2, especially the mass-forming/focal type, and pancreatic cancer is important, but challenging. In this regard, endoscopic ultrasound-guided core biopsy has a key role, but novel diagnostic markers and modalities are clearly needed.

Endoscopic Ultrasound in Pancreatology: Focus on Inflammatory Diseases and Interventions

Background

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is a main tool in pancreatology for both diagnosis and therapy. It allows minimally invasive differentiation of various diseases, with a minimal degree of inflammation or anatomic variations. EUS also enables interventional direct access to the pancreatic parenchyma and the retroperitoneal space, the pancreatic duct, the pancreatic masses, cysts, vascular structures for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes.

Summary

This review aimed to summarize the new developments of EUS in the field of pancreatology, with special interest on inflammation and interventions. EUS enables way to perform pseudocyst drainage, necrosectomy, transenteral drainage and transenteric access of the main pancreatic duct, or the direct visualization or therapy of vascular structures adjacent to the pancreas.

Key Messages

EUS has a deep impact on pancreatology, and the development of new diagnostic and interventional approaches to the retroperitoneal space and the pancreas has increased in the last years exponentially, allowing minimal invasive diagnostics and therapy and avoiding surgery and percutaneous therapy.

Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS) Guided Elastography

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is an essential technique for the management of several diseases. Over the years, new technologies have been developed to improve and overcome certain limitations related to EUS-guided tissue acquisition. Among these new methods, EUS-guided elastography, which is a real-time method for the evaluation of tissue stiffness, has arisen as one of the most widely recognized and available. At present, there are available two different systems to perform an elastographic evaluation: strain elastography and shear wave elastography. Strain elastography is based on the knowledge that certain diseases lead to a change in tissue hardness while shear wave elastography monitored shear-wave propagation and measures its velocity. EUS-guided elastography has shown in several studies high accuracy in differentiating benign from malignant lesions from many different locations, mostly in the pancreas and lymph nodes. Therefore, nowadays, there are well-established indications for this technology, mainly for supporting the management of pancreatic diseases (diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis and differential diagnosis of solid pancreatic tumors) and characterization of different diseases. However, there are more data on new potential indications for the near future. In this review, we will present the theoretical bases of this technology and we will discuss the scientific evidence to support its use.

Comments on and Illustrations of the EFSUMB CEUS Guidelines: Transabdominal and Endoscopic Ultrasound Features of Intrapancreatic Metastases and the Role of Multiparametric Imaging and EUS-Guided Sampling in Rare Pancreatic Tumors

A definite pathologic diagnosis of intrapancreatic metastasis is crucial for the management decision, i.e., curative or palliative surgery versus chemotherapy or conservative/palliative therapy. This review focuses on the appearance of intrapancreatic metastases on native and contrast-enhanced transabdominal ultrasound and endoscopic ultrasound. Differences and similarities in relation to the primary tumor, and the differential diagnosis from pancreatic carcinoma and neuroendocrine neoplasms are described. The frequency of intrapancreatic metastases in autopsy studies and surgical resection studies will be discussed. Further emphasis is placed on endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling to confirm the diagnosis.

A multidomain fusion model of radiomics and deep learning to discriminate between PDAC and AIP based on 18F-FDG PET/CT images

PURPOSE

To explore a multidomain fusion model of radiomics and deep learning features based on ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT) images to distinguish pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP), which could effectively improve the accuracy of diseases diagnosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 48 patients with AIP (mean age, 65 ± 12.0 years; range, 37-90 years) and 64 patients with PDAC patients (mean age, 66 ± 11.3 years; range, 32-88 years). Three different methods were discussed to identify PDAC and AIP based on ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT images, including the radiomics model (RAD_model), the deep learning model (DL_model), and the multidomain fusion model (MF_model). We also compared the classification results of PET/CT, PET, and CT images in these three models. In addition, we explored the attributes of deep learning abstract features by analyzing the correlation between radiomics and deep learning features. Five-fold cross-validation was used to calculate receiver operating characteristic (ROC), area under the roc curve (AUC), accuracy (Acc), sensitivity (Sen), and specificity (Spe) to quantitatively evaluate the performance of different classification models.

RESULTS

The experimental results showed that the multidomain fusion model had the best comprehensive performance compared with radiomics and deep learning models, and the AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity were 96.4% (95% CI 95.4-97.3%), 90.1% (95% CI 88.7-91.5%), 87.5% (95% CI 84.3-90.6%), and 93.0% (95% CI 90.3-95.6%), respectively. And our study proved that the multimodal features of PET/CT were superior to using either PET or CT features alone. First-order features of radiomics provided valuable complementary information for the deep learning model.

CONCLUSION

The preliminary results of this paper demonstrated that our proposed multidomain fusion model fully exploits the value of radiomics and deep learning features based on ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT images, which provided competitive accuracy for the discrimination of PDAC and AIP.

Early detection of pancreatic tumors by advanced EUS imaging

The early detection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) dramatically improves outcome. All available state-of-the-art imaging methods allow early detection with EUS being the best technique for exclusion of PDAC and detection of very early PDAC. Etiological differentiation of small SPL is important to guide individually tailored patients' management including radical surgery in resectable PDAC, medical (neoadjuvant or palliative intended) treatment in patients with non-resectable malignancy, pancreatic parenchyma saving strategies in some non-PDAC, and follow-up in particular in low-grade PanNEN or other small benign lesions. Multimodality EUS imaging including B-Mode assessment, elastography, contrast-enhancement and EUS-guided sampling is the most appropriate technique for diagnosis and risk assessment of small SPL. We present a review discussing modern (endoscopic) ultrasound imaging techniques including contrast enhanced ultrasound and elastography for the early detection and characterization of solid pancreatic lesions.

[All about the Pancreas]

All about the Pancreas Abstract. Ultrasound has made tremendous progress with the use of contrast media and elastography, particularly in patients with small, solid pancreatic lesions (SPL) <20mm and cystic tumors (CPL) of any size. In the case of solid and cystic pancreatic lesions, the differential diagnosis must first be evaluated after detection in order to define the indications for radical surgery, strategies for preserving the pancreatic parenchyma or simply for control examinations. Contrast-enhanced transcutaneous (TUS, CEUS) and endoscopic (EUS, CE-EUS) ultrasound and elastography facilitate further characterization of SPL and ZPL. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDAC) show hypoenhancement in contrast-enhanced ultrasound. The majority of the important differential diagnoses, on the other hand, are multi-enhancing. PDAC are almost always harder than healthy pancreatic parenchyma. In contrast, elastographically soft SPL are - with very few exceptions - benign. This review provides an overview of the use of modern ultrasound techniques to detect and characterize solid and cystic pancreatic lesions.

Basic pancreatic lesions: Radiologic-pathologic correlation

The basic pancreatic lesions include location, size, shape, number, capsule, calcification/calculi, hemorrhage, cystic degeneration, fibrosis, pancreatic duct alterations, and microvessel. One or more basic lesions form a kind of pancreatic disease. As recognizing the characteristic imaging features of pancreatic basic lesions and their relationships with pathology aids in differentiating the variety of pancreatic diseases. The purpose of this study is to review the pathological and imaging features of the basic pancreatic lesions.

Deep learning radiomics based on contrast-enhanced ultrasound images for assisted diagnosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and chronic pancreatitis

BACKGROUND

Accurate and non-invasive diagnosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and chronic pancreatitis (CP) can avoid unnecessary puncture and surgery. This study aimed to develop a deep learning radiomics (DLR) model based on contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) images to assist radiologists in identifying PDAC and CP.

METHODS

Patients with PDAC or CP were retrospectively enrolled from three hospitals. Detailed clinicopathological data were collected for each patient. Diagnoses were confirmed pathologically using biopsy or surgery in all patients. We developed an end-to-end DLR model for diagnosing PDAC and CP using CEUS images. To verify the clinical application value of the DLR model, two rounds of reader studies were performed.

RESULTS

A total of 558 patients with pancreatic lesions were enrolled and were split into the training cohort (n=351), internal validation cohort (n=109), and external validation cohorts 1 (n=50) and 2 (n=48). The DLR model achieved an area under curve (AUC) of 0.986 (95% CI 0.975-0.994), 0.978 (95% CI 0.950-0.996), 0.967 (95% CI 0.917-1.000), and 0.953 (95% CI 0.877-1.000) in the training, internal validation, and external validation cohorts 1 and 2, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of the DLR model were higher than or comparable to the diagnoses of the five radiologists in the three validation cohorts. With the aid of the DLR model, the diagnostic sensitivity of all radiologists was further improved at the expense of a small or no decrease in specificity in the three validation cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this study suggest that our DLR model can be used as an effective tool to assist radiologists in the diagnosis of PDAC and CP.

Persistent enlargement of the pancreatic gland after glucocorticoid therapy increases the risk of relapse in IgG4-related autoimmune pancreatitis

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to clarify the relationship between the changes of pancreatic size after glucocorticoid (GC) therapy and relapse in IgG4-related autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP).

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled 205 newly diagnosed IgG4-related AIP patients. 145 patients were followed up for more than 3 years. These patients were divided into three groups according to the changes of pancreatic size after treatment of 6 months: pancreatic swelling, normal size, and pancreatic atrophy. Baseline clinical and laboratory parameters were compared among three groups. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed in the 134 patients based on GC therapy. Besides, Cox regression analysis and logistic regression analysis were performed to identify risk factors associated with relapse and the potential variables affecting changes of pancreatic size after treatment.

RESULTS

Age at diagnosis, white blood cell count, and serum IgG1 level at baseline were significantly different among the three groups. After treatment of 6 months, the pancreas of most patients (n = 81, 55.9%) could return to normal size, while persistent pancreatic swelling was found in 24.1% patients (n = 35), and atrophy was observed in 20.0% of the patients (n = 29). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis presented patients with pancreatic swelling after 6 months of GC therapy were more likely to relapse in the follow-up of 3 years. Persistent pancreatic swelling after treatment and salivary gland involvement at baseline were independent risk variables associated with relapse in IgG4-related AIP patients, while GC-based therapy was a protective factor of relapse. Logistic regression analysis revealed that older age at diagnosis was associated with pancreatic atrophy and higher baseline serum IgG1 level was associated with pancreatic swelling after treatment of 6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with persistent pancreatic swelling after GC-based therapy of 6 months were more likely to relapse in the follow-up of 3 years. Older age at diagnosis and higher baseline serum IgG1 level were potential variables associated with pancreatic atrophy or swelling after treatment of 6 months. Key Points • Patients with persistent pancreatic swelling after glucocorticoid-based therapy were more likely to relapse in IgG4-related autoimmune pancreatitis. • Older age at diagnosis was associated with pancreatic atrophy after glucocorticoid-based therapy. • Higher baseline serum IgG1 level was associated pancreatic swelling after glucocorticoid-based therapy.

Application of dynamic contrast enhanced ultrasound in distinguishing focal-type autoimmune pancreatitis from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To explore the value of dynamic contrast enhanced ultrasound (DCE-US) in preoperative differential diagnosis of focal-type autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From May 2016 to March 2020, patients with biopsy and histopathologically confirmed focal-type AIP (n = 9) were retrospectively included. All patients received contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) examinations one week before surgery/biopsy. Dynamic analysis was performed by VueBox® software (Bracco, Italy). Eighteen cases of resection and histopathologically proved PDAC lesions were also included as control group. B mode ultrasound (BMUS) features, CEUS enhancement patterns, time intensity curves (TICs) and CEUS quantitative parameters were obtained and compared between AIP and PDAC lesions.

RESULTS

After injection of ultrasound contrast agents, most focal-type AIP lesions displayed hyper-enhancement (2/9, 22.2%) or iso-enhancement (6/9, 66.7%) during arterial phase of CEUS, while most of PDAC lesions showed hypo-enhancement (88.9%) (P < 0.01). During late phase, most of AIP lesions showed iso-enhancement (8/9, 88.9%), while most of PDAC lesions showed hypo-enhancement (94.4%) (P < 0.001). Compared with PDAC lesions, TICs of AIP lesions showed delayed and higher enhancement. Among all CEUS perfusion parameters, ratio of PE (peak enhancement), WiAUC (wash-in area under the curve), WiR (wash-in rate), WiPI (wash-in perfusion index, WiPI = WiAUC/ rise time), WoAUC (wash-out area under the curve), WiWoAUC (wash-in and wash-out area under the curve) and WoR (wash-out rate) between pancreatic lesion and surrounding normal pancreatic tissue were significantly higher in AIP lesions than PDAC lesions (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

DCE-US with quantitative analysis has the potential to make preoperative differential diagnosis between focal-type AIP and PDAC non-invasively.

[Alternatives of histological material collection - When and how is histological confirmation by ultrasound (US), computer tomography (CT) or endosonography (EUS) useful?]

Histological classifications of tumorous lesions together with adequate staging are necessary for stage-appropriate and personalized therapies. The indications, technical possibilities, and limitations as well as potential complications of image-guided needle biopsy by ultrasound, computed tomography, and endosonography are described. Which procedure for which organ and which lesion?

Value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound combined with percutaneous ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in the diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions

Background:

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) can detect lesions hidden in inflammatory regions and find necrosis or areas of severe fibrosis within the lesion. This retrospective study aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of solid pancreatic lesions using percutaneous ultrasound (US)-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) with or without CEUS assessment.

Methods:

Clinical, imaging, and pathologic data of 181 patients from January 2014 to December 2018 in Pecking Union Medical College Hospital, with solid pancreatic masses who underwent percutaneous US-FNA and ThinPrep cytologic test were retrospectively evaluated. Patients were divided into CEUS and US groups according to whether CEUS was performed before the biopsy. According to FNA cytology diagnoses, we combined non-diagnostic, neoplastic, and negative cases into a negative category. The positive category included malignant, suspicious, and atypical cases. The final diagnosis was confirmed by pathology or clinical and radiological follow-up for at least 12 months. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of US-FNA were evaluated between the two groups.

Results:

This study enrolled 107 male and 74 female patients (average age: 60 years). There were 58 cases in the US group and 123 cases in the CEUS group. No statistically significant differences in age, gender, or lesion size were found between the two groups. The diagnostic accuracy of the CEUS group was 95.1% (117/123), which was higher than the 86.2% (50/58) observed in the US group (P = 0.036). The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of the CEUS group were increased by 7.5%, 16.7%, 3.4%, and 18.8%, respectively, compared with the US group. However, the differences of the two groups were not statistically significant.

Conclusions:

Compared with the conventional US, the use of CEUS could improve the biopsy accuracy and avoid the need for a repeat biopsy, especially for some complicated FNA cases.

Imaging diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis using endoscopic ultrasonography

The diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is challenging and should be achieved through the comprehensive evaluation of clinical, radiological, serological, and pathological evidence, as there is currently no single reliable diagnostic modality. Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) can reveal pancreatic parenchymal and ductal features in much more detail than any other existing imaging modality. In this article, we focused on three applications of EUS, i.e., conventional EUS imaging, EUS elastography (EUS-EG), and contrast-enhanced harmonic EUS (CEH-EUS), for the diagnosis of AIP. Diffuse hypoechoic areas, diffuse enlargement, bile duct wall thickening, and peripancreatic hypoechoic margins on conventional EUS are characteristic features of AIP, and the frequencies of these findings are significantly higher in AIP than in pancreatic cancer (PC). EUS-EG of the pancreatic parenchyma in AIP showed homogenous stiffness and that the elasticity of the pancreas may change after steroid therapy. CEH-EUS revealed focal or diffuse iso-enhancement in most AIP cases and hypo-enhancement in most PC cases. However, some AIP cases show a contrast enhancement pattern similar to that of PC. It should be noted that EUS findings of AIP may differ depending on its stage or disease activity. Differentiation from PC has become an increasingly important issue in the process of diagnosing AIP, and EUS, including elastography and contrast enhancement, could be a promising imaging modality for this purpose.

Autoimmune pancreatitis presenting as a pancreatic head mass

The diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is often difficult as the main differential diagnosis is pancreatic head adenocarcinoma. Some clinical, radiological, serological and histological criteria help in guiding the diagnosis. The serum gamma-globulin IgG4 dosage is the most sensitive and specific marker. The shape of the ductal stenosis in AIP is characteristic. The treatment is based on corticosteroids. We report the case of a 53-year-old woman, presenting with pancreatic head mass mimicking an adenocarcinoma.

Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Relating Biomechanics and Prognosis

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the most common form of pancreatic cancer and carries a dismal prognosis. Resectable patients are treated predominantly with surgery while borderline resectable patients may receive neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) to downstage their disease prior to possible resection. PDAC tissue is stiffer than healthy pancreas, and tissue stiffness is associated with cancer progression. Another feature of PDAC is increased tissue heterogeneity. We postulate that tumour stiffness and heterogeneity may be used alongside currently employed diagnostics to better predict prognosis and response to treatment. In this review we summarise the biomechanical changes observed in PDAC, explore the factors behind these changes and describe the clinical consequences. We identify methods available for assessing PDAC biomechanics ex vivo and in vivo, outlining the relative merits of each. Finally, we discuss the potential use of radiological imaging for prognostic use.

Aetiological risk factors are associated with distinct imaging findings in patients with chronic pancreatitis: A study of 959 cases from the Scandinavian Baltic Pancreatic Club (SBPC) imaging database

OBJECTIVES

The relation between aetiology and structural changes of the pancreas in patients with chronic pancreatitis (CP) is not fully understood. Earlier studies are limited by focusing on selected factors in studies of limited sample size. We aimed to use a large dataset to explore associations between aetiology and pancreatic morphology in CP.

METHODS

Subjects with definite or probable CP according to the M-ANNHEIM diagnostic criteria were included in this multicentre cross-sectional observational study and assessed using a standardized and validated CP imaging system. We performed multivariate logistic regression to analyse if aetiological factors adjusted for covariates were independently associated with morphological pancreatic features.

RESULTS

We included 959 patients (66% males). Mean (SD) age was 55 (14) years. Pancreatic structural changes were found in 94% of the subjects: 67% had calcifications, 59% main pancreatic duct dilatation, 33% pseudo-cysts and 22% pancreatic atrophy. Alcohol abuse was independently associated with pancreatic calcifications (odds ratio (OR, [95% CI]); 1.61, [1.09, 2.37]) and focal acute pancreatitis (OR; 2.13, [1.27, 3.56]), whereas smoking was independently associated with more severe calcifications (OR; 2.09, [1.34, 3.27]) and involvement of the whole gland (OR; 2.29, [1.61, 3.28]). Disease duration was positively associated with calcifications (OR; (per year) 1.05 [1.02, 1.08]) and pancreatic atrophy (OR; 1.05 [1.02, 1.08]) and negatively associated with focal acute pancreatitis (OR 0.91, [0.87, 0.95] and pseudo cysts (OR; 0.96, [0.93, 0.98]).

CONCLUSION

In this large-scale study, etiological risk factors and disease duration in CP were independently associated with specific structural pancreatic imaging changes.

An initial trial of quantitative evaluation of autoimmune pancreatitis using shear wave elastography and shear wave dispersion in transabdominal ultrasound

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

We aimed to examine therapeutic efficacy and prognosis prediction of autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) using shear wave elastography (SWE) and shear wave dispersion (SWD) in transabdominal ultrasound (US).

METHODS

The subjects were 23 patients with diffuse type 1 AIP who underwent SWE and SWD, and 34 controls with a normal pancreas. Elasticity and dispersion were defined as the pancreatic elastic modulus (PEM) and dispersion slope, respectively. PEM and dispersion slope were compared between AIP and control cases, and the short-term therapeutic effect and long-term prognosis were examined.

RESULTS

PEM (30.9 vs. 6.6 kPa, P < 0.001) and dispersion slope (15.3 vs. 13.0 (m/sec)/kHz, P = 0.011) were significantly higher in AIP cases than in controls. Among the 17 AIP patients followed-up in two weeks after treatment, these parameters were 12.7 kPa and 10.5 (m/sec)/kHz with median decrease rate of 37.2% and 32.8%, respectively, which were significantly higher than the change in the size of pancreatic parenchyma (14.4%, P = 0.026). Fourteen of these subjects were followed up for >12 months, during which 2 had relapse; diabetes improved in 5 and worsened in 2; in 60% of cases, the pancreatic parenchyma was atrophied. The % change in PEM after two weeks was tended to be higher in non-atrophy cases.

CONCLUSION

SWE and SWD measurement in US may be useful for quantitative assessment of AIP and evaluation of short-term treatment efficacy.

Focal Autoimmune Pancreatitis: A Simple Flow Chart for a Challenging Diagnosis

Autoimmune pancreatitis is a chronic fibroinflammatory autoimmune mediated disease of the pancreas. Clinically, obstructive painless jaundice and upper abdominal pain are the main symptoms. Focal AIP is characterized by segmental involvement of pancreatic parenchyma and it is often radiologically represented by a pancreatic mass. In these cases, the diagnosis can be very challenging, since it may be easily confused with pancreatic cancer. Therefore, we suggest a combined approach of imaging tests as the diagnostic workup. EUS study combined with CEUS and elastography, if available, increases the accuracy of the method to rule out cancer. Moreover, the lesion should always be sampled under EUS guidance to obtain a cyto/histological diagnosis. The diagnostic workup should also include the use of diagnostic clinical criteria (extrapancreatic lesions, steroid response) and laboratory findings (CA 19.9 and IgG4 evaluations).

What does liver elastography measure? Technical aspects and methodology

Elastography can be thought as an extension of the ancient technique of palpation. After giving a short introduction to the history of elastography, the different technologies that are nowadays available and the physics behind them, the article focuses on the assessment of liver stiffness in patients with diffuse liver disease using shear wave elastography (SWE). Practical advices on how to perform the SWE techniques and on the factors that should be considered for a correct interpretation of the results are given. This paper aimed to provide a practical guide for beginners and advanced clinical users to better understand technical aspects, methodologies and terminology.

Autoimmune pancreatitis - An ongoing challenge

Autoimmune pancreatitis is a rare form of chronic pancreatitis. The first descriptions of the disease date back to the 1990s. Etiology is multifactorial, with the use of genetic, environmental and complex immunological mechanisms. It is classified into two subtypes. Type 1 is part of a group of diseases called IgG4-related disease. Clinically is autoimmune pancreatitis manifested by icterus and abdominal discomfort. It can rarely present as acute pancreatitis. There is also a completely asymptomatic form of the disease. The diagnosis is based on abnormalities in histology, imaging methods, serology, the involvement of other organs in relation to IgG4-related disease, and a significant positive response to corticosteroid therapy. Differential diagnosis between the focal form of autoimmune pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer can be complicated, with endosonography playing an important role. In the treatment, we use corticosteroids and other immunosuppressants including biological therapy. Patients with the asymptomatic disease should also be treated to prevent late complications and exocrine and endocrine insufficiency. In addition to drug treatment, endoscopic and/or surgical treatment may be necessary. Even after recovery, the disease can relapse. The relationship between autoimmune pancreatitis and malignancies has not been clearly confirmed. The goal of this review is to provide a comprehensive look at autoimmune pancreatitis and translate latest scientific knowledge into clinical practice.

Endoscopic ultrasonography elastography in the diagnosis of intrapancreatic ectopic spleen: A case report

BACKGROUND

Intrapancreatic accessory spleen (IPAS) mimics a pancreatic neoplasm on imaging studies, and due to the lack of radiological diagnostic criteria, patients undergo unnecessary distal pancreatectomies. Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is a reliable and efficient diagnostic modality for pancreatic diseases. However, no EUS criteria have been established for IPAS. We present the EUS-elastography image of IPAS, which may minimize the chance of misdiagnosis in the future.

CASE SUMMARY

A 50-year-old man was referred for an EUS evaluation after computed tomography showed a hypervascular enhanced mass in the tail of the pancreas, which indicated a neuroendocrine neoplasm. EUS elastography demonstrated that the lesion of interest covered no more than 25% of the region of interest. The patient underwent distal pancreatectomy. However, the resected tissue was evaluated, and the patient was finally diagnosed with IPAS.

CONCLUSION

IPAS should be considered in patients with suspected pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreatic tail before surgery is performed. The differentiation between IPAS and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors can be demonstrated using EUS-elastography.

Do we need contrast agents for EUS?

We recently introduced a series of articles that dealt with controversies in EUS. In Part I, the authors discussed which clinical information is necessary prior to EUS and whether other imaging modalities are required before embarking on EUS examinations. Part II focuses on technical details and controversies about the use of EUS in special situations. In this article, important practical issues regarding the application of contrast-enhanced EUS in various clinical settings are raised and controversially discussed from different points of view.

Do we need elastography for EUS?

We recently introduced a series of papers “What should be known prior to performing EUS exams.” In Part I, the authors discussed which clinical information and whether other imaging modalities are needed before embarking EUS examinations. In Part II, technical controversies on how EUS is performed were discussed from different points of view. In this article, important practical issues regarding EUS elastography will be raised and controversially discussed from very different points of view.

Clinical impact of strain histogram EUS elastography and contrast-enhanced EUS for the differential diagnosis of focal pancreatic masses: A prospective multicentric study

Background:

Recent advances in EUS techniques (real-time EUS elastography and contrast-enhanced EUS) have allowed a better characterization of focal pancreatic masses. Mean strain histograms (SHs) are considered a good parameter for the semi-quantitative evaluation of focal pancreatic masses, alongside complementary contrast-enhanced EUS parameters which can be quantified during both the early arterial and late venous phase.

Materials and Methods:

The study design was prospective, blinded, and multicentric, assessing real-time EUS elastography and contrast-enhanced EUS results for the characterization of focal pancreatic masses using parametric measurements, in comparison with pathology which is the gold standard. SHs were performed based on the embedded software of the ultrasound system, with the values being reversed as opposed to our initially published data on hue histograms. Consequently, a cutoff of 80 was derived from previous multicentric trials. Contrast-enhanced EUS also allowed the focal masses to be classified as hyper-, iso-, or hypoenhanced in comparison with the normal pancreatic parenchyma. EUS-FNA was then performed for all patients, with a positive cytological diagnosis taken as a final proof of malignancy for the pancreatic masses. The diagnoses obtained by EUS-FNA were verified further either by surgery or during a clinical follow-up of at least 6 months.

Results:

A total number of 97 consecutive patients with focal pancreatic masses were included in the study. Based on previously defined cutoffs of 80, the values of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of the mean SHs for the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer were 100%, 29.63%, 78.65%, 100%, and 80.41%, respectively. Corresponding values for contrast-enhanced EUS (taking into consideration hypoenhencement as a predictive factor of malignancy) were 98.57%, 77.78%, 92%, 95.45%, and 92.78%, respectively. Combining contrast enhancement-EUS (hypoenhencement) and semi-quantitative EUS elastography (SH cutoffs <80), the resulting values corresponding for sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 98.57%, 81.48%, and 93.81%, respectively.

Conclusion:

The current study using objective parametric tools for both EUS elastography and contrast-enhanced EUS confirmed the results of previous studies and meta-analyses that indicated a complementary role for the differential diagnosis of focal pancreatic masses. Moreover, the best values for the receiver operating curves were obtained using a sequential clinical algorithm based on the initial use of elastography, followed by contrast enhancement.

Clinical use of contrast-enhanced ultrasound beyond the liver: a focus on renal, splenic, and pancreatic applications

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is a relatively novel, but increasingly used, diagnostic imaging modality. In recent years, due to its safety, quickness, and repeatability, several studies have demonstrated the accuracy, specificity, and sensitivity of CEUS. The European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology has recently updated the previous guidelines from 2012 for the use of CEUS in non-hepatic applications. This review deals with the clinical use and applications of CEUS for the evaluation of non-hepatic abdominal organs, focusing on renal, splenic, and pancreatic applications.

Modern ultrasound imaging of pancreatic tumors

In patients with solid pancreatic lesions (SPLs), the differential diagnosis must be evaluated to determine whether radical surgery, pancreatic parenchyma-saving strategies, or follow-up is indicated. Contrast-enhanced (endoscopic) ultrasonography and elastography facilitate the further characterization of SPLs. The majority of cases of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma exhibit hypoenhancement with contrast-enhanced ultrasonography. Elastographically soft SPLs are benign with very few exceptions, whereas stiffer SPLs can be malignant or benign. This article reviews the current use of modern ultrasound imaging techniques, including contrast-enhanced ultrasonography and elastography, for the detection and characterization of SPLs. In particular, the unexcelled diagnostic potential of multiparametric endoscopic ultrasonography to detect and characterize small SPLs is highlighted.

Elastography of the Pancreas, Current View

Ultrasound elastography (USE) of the pancreas allows pancreatic tissue stiffness assessment by virtual palpation. Two main types of USE are used. For the pancreas strain elastography applying by endoscopic ultrasound has been established for the characterisation of small solid pancreatic lesions (SPL). In larger SPL >30 mm the results are less convincing mainly due to the heterogenicity of the lesions but also by concomitant changes of the surrounding pancreatic parenchyma. The current role of shear wave elastography has to be determined. This article reviews the current use of elastography of the pancreas.

Review of Dancing Parasites in Lymphatic Filariasis

Lymphatic filariasis is an infection transmitted by blood-sucking mosquitoes with filarial nematodes of the species Wuchereria bancrofti, Brugia malayi und B. timori . It is prevalent in tropical countries throughout the world, with more than 60 million people infected and more than 1 billion living in areas with the risk of transmission. Worm larvae with a length of less than 1 mm are transmitted by mosquitoes, develop in human lymphatic tissue to adult worms with a length of 7-10 cm, live in the human body for up to 10 years and produce millions of microfilariae, which can be transmitted further by mosquitoes. The adult worms can be easily observed by ultrasonography because of their size and fast movements (the so-called "filarial dance sign"), which can be differentiated from other movements (e. g., blood in venous vessels) by their characteristic movement profile in pulsed-wave Doppler mode. Therapeutic options include (combinations of) ivermectin, albendazole, diethylcarbamazine and doxycycline. The latter depletes endosymbiotic Wolbachia bacteria from the worms and thus sterilizes and later kills the adult worms (macrofilaricidal or adulticidal effect).

Evaluation of a new slim radial echoendoscope: A better option for an aging population

Background and Objectives:

The radial echoendoscope is still widely used for the investigation of abnormalities in the gastrointestinal wall and for stone detection in the extrahepatic biliary tree. Due to aging patient population, EUS is frequently performed in fragile and elderly individuals. We aimed to compare the maneuverability and image quality of a new thin radial echoendoscope to the current one.

Patients and Methods:

This evaluation was conducted at a referral academic EUS center. The new radial echoendoscope has a thinner shaft and distal tube and a shorter bending section compared to the previous one. Patients referred for diagnostic EUS with a radial echoendoscope were enrolled. Indications included pancreaticobiliary disease, esophagogastric abnormalities, and neoplasms and rectal cancer staging.

Results:

We enrolled 177 patients (122 pancreaticobiliary, 48 esophagogastric, and 7 rectal cases). Overall, the new echoendoscope performed better than the previous model in terms of maneuverability during esophageal intubation and transition from the duodenal bulb to the second portion. On the other hand, pylorus traversing was comparable to the current radial echoendoscope. No loss in image quality was appreciated at predefined stations (esophagus, stomach, and duodenum) compared to the current model. On the other hand, image penetration depth in tissue harmonic mode was significantly improved with the new echoendoscope.

Conclusions:

A new thinner radial echoendoscope showed improved maneuverability compared to the existing version. Image quality was also improved thanks to increased penetration depth in the tissue harmonic mode. We speculate that this new echoendoscope may allow for safer and faster EUS examination, which may prove useful in an aging patient population.

What should be known prior to performing EUS?

Direct referral of patients for EUS – instead of preprocedural consultation with the endosonographer – has become standard practice (like for other endoscopic procedures) as it is time- and cost-effective. To ensure appropriate indications and safe examinations, the endosonographer should carefully consider what information is needed before accepting the referral. This includes important clinical data regarding relevant comorbidities, the fitness of the patient to consent and undergo the procedure, and the anticoagulation status. In addition, relevant findings from other imaging methods to clarify the clinical question may be necessary. Appropriate knowledge and management of the patients’ anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy, antibiotic prophylaxis, and sedation issues can avoid unnecessary delays and unsafe procedures. Insisting on optimal preparation, appropriate indications, and clear clinical referral questions will increase the quality of the outcomes of EUS. In this paper, important practical issues regarding EUS preparations are raised and discussed from different points of view.

What should be known prior to performing EUS exams? (Part II)

In “What should be known prior to performing EUS exams, Part I,” the authors discussed the need for clinical information and whether other imaging modalities are required before embarking EUS examinations. Herewith, we present part II which addresses some (technical) controversies how EUS is performed and discuss from different points of view providing the relevant evidence as available. (1) Does equipment design influence the complication rate? (2) Should we have a standardized screen orientation? (3) Radial EUS versus longitudinal (linear) EUS. (4) Should we search for incidental findings using EUS?

Discriminating chronic pancreatitis from pancreatic cancer: Contrast-enhanced EUS and multidetector computed tomography in direct comparison

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

To compare the ability of multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) and contrast-enhanced EUS to discriminate chronic pancreatitis (CP) from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

A total of 215 patients (age: 62 ± 15 years, sex: f/m 80/135) were included in this retrospective study. All patients were examined by conventional endoscopic B-mode and contrast-enhanced high mechanical index EUS (CEHMI-EUS). CELMI-EUS was performed in 159 patients and endoscopic sonoelastography (ESE) in 210 patients. MDCT was carried out in 131 patients as part of their clinical work-up. Radiological reports were retrospectively analyzed. Final diagnosis was achieved by biopsy and evaluation of cytological specimens collected was performed by EUS-FNA, surgery, or follow-up of 12 months or more in patients with benign findings. In a subgroup of 100 patients, all diagnostic five methods were performed, and head-to-head analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Sensitivity and specificity for MDCT were 89% and 70% and for CEHMI-EUS were 96% and 91%, respectively. Sensitivities and specificities for EUS were 92% and 63% for B-Mode EUS, 96% and 38% for ESE, and 82% and 76% for CELMI-EUS, respectively. In the head-to-head analysis, each modality had shown lower numbers for specificity than shown in the overall group analysis because of high drop-out rate. EUS-FNA for PDAC had a sensitivity of 96% and a specificity of 100%.

CONCLUSIONS

Contrast-enhanced EUS is a reliable tool in discriminating PDAC from CP.