Current management of glioma in Pakistan

Adjuvant therapy for brain tumors in LMICs: A systematic review of barriers and possible solutions

BACKGROUND

Adjuvant therapy is an important tool in the arsenal of brain tumor management and can improve patients' outcomes significantly but low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) often face challenges in provision. Therefore, our study aims to highlight barriers and strategies to adjuvant therapy of brain tumors in low-resource settings.

METHOD

A comprehensive search of literature was conducted using PubMed, CINAHL, Google Scholar, and Scopus, from inception to October 20, 2022. The review included studies on adjuvant therapy for brain tumors in LMICs and identified themes using the National Surgical, Obstetric, and Anesthesia Plan (NSOAP) domains.

RESULTS

32 studies were included in the review. The most reported barriers to adjuvant care were limited access to healthcare (14 %), limited access to chemotherapy and radiation equipment (25 %), and traditional or alternative medications (11 %). Strategies for improvement include improving the availability of specialized radiation oncology training (8 %) and improving access to neuro-diagnostics and neurotherapeutics (12 %). In addition, efforts to subsidize treatment (4 %) and provide financial coverage through the Ministry of Health (4 %) can help to address the high cost of care and improve access to funding for chemotherapy. Finally, establishing documentation systems and registries (16 %), implementing standardized national treatment guidelines (8 %) can help to improve overall care for brain tumor patients in LMICs.

CONCLUSION

A multimodal approach of strategies targeting workforce, infrastructure, service delivery, financing, and information management is needed to improve adjuvant care for brain tumors. International collaboration and partnerships can also play a key role in addressing barriers and improving care in LMICs.

Comparison of Glioblastoma Outcomes in Two Geographically and Ethnically Distinct Patient Populations in Disparate Health Care Systems

Introduction  Variations in glioblastoma (GBM) outcomes between geographically and ethnically distinct patient populations has been rarely studied. To explore the possible similarities and differences, we performed a comparative analysis of GBM patients at the University of Kentucky (UK) in the United States and the Aga Khan University Hospital (AKUH) in Pakistan.

Methods  A retrospective review was conducted of consecutive patients who underwent surgery for GBM between January 2013 and December 2016 at UK, and July 2014 and December 2017 at AKUH. Patients with recurrent or multifocal disease on presentation and those who underwent only a biopsy were excluded. SPSS (v.25 IBM, Armonk, New York, United States) was used to collect and analyze data.

Results  Eighty-six patients at UK (mean age: 58.8 years; 37 [43%] < 60 years and 49 [57%] > 60 years) and 38 patients at AKUH (mean age: 49.1 years; 30 (79%) < 60 years and 8 (21%) > 60 years) with confirmed GBM were studied. At UK, median overall survival (OS) was 11.5 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 8.9–14) months, while at AKUH, median OS was 18 (95% CI: 13.9–22) months ( p  = 0.002). With gross-total resection (GTR), median OS at UK was 16 (95% CI: 9.5–22.4) months, whereas at AKUH, it was 24 (95% CI: 17.6–30.3) months ( p  = 0.011).

Conclusion  Median OS at UK was consistent with U.S. data but was noted to be longer at AKUH, likely due to a younger patient cohort and higher preoperative Karnofsky's performance scale (KPS). GTR, particularly in patients younger than 60 years of age and a higher preoperative KPS had a significant positive impact on OS and progression-free survival (PFS) at both institutions.

Relationship between molecular characteristics of glioblastoma multiforme and the subventricular zone

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to assess the relationship between the molecular characteristics of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) and the subventricular zone (SVZ).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Eligible patients had their data anonymously collected from an institutional database, including age, sex, preoperative performance status, the extent of tumour resection, anatomical location, IDH mutation and MGMT methylation status. An Institutional picture archiving and communications system was used for volumetric and morphometric analysis. All measurements were made on T1-weighted magnetic resonance images with gadolinium contrast enhancement. IDH wild-type and mutant GBMs were stratified by MGMT methylation status. The relationship between tumour volume, distance from the tumour's enhancing edge and the tumour's geometric centre to the SVZ and their molecular characteristics were assessed.

RESULTS

Fifty IDH wild-type GBMs were studied. Twenty-three were MGMT methylated, Twenty-seven were unmethylated. IDH wild-type MGMT methylated GBMs were significantly associated with a tumour's enhancing boundary being contiguous to the SVZ (P < 0.001). Ninety percent of tumours contiguous to the SVZ were wild-type methylated (n = 18) and 10% were unmethylated (n = 2). Mean GBM geometric centre distance to SVZ was significantly less for methylated wild-type GBMs compared to unmethylated (P = 0.025) and median GBM distance from the tumour's edge of enhancement to the SVZ was significantly shorter in methylated tumours compared to unmethylated (P < 0.001). Mean and median distances to SVZ from the edge of enhancement was 3.8 millimetres (mm) and 0 mm, respectively, for wild-type methylated GBMs, while for unmethylated wild-types, 14.6 mm, and 12.5 mm. There was no anatomical localisation of IDH wild-type GBMs by MGMT methylation status to a cerebral hemisphere or lobe.

CONCLUSION

IDH wild-type GBMs contiguous to the SVZ are highly likely to be MGMT methylated. Replication by further studies is required to affirm our results and conclusion.