Real-world Efficacy and Safety of Apremilast Monotherapy in the Management of Moderate-to-severe Psoriasis

Circulating Monocytes Are Predictive and Responsive in Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis Subjects Treated with Apremilast

Monocytes play a critical role in the inflammation associated with psoriasis, and their abnormalities have been reported as biomarkers of cardiovascular event risk, a psoriasis comorbidity. Monocytic cells in chronic inflammatory disorders express elevated levels of cAMP phosphodiesterase. Restoring cAMP levels using the oral cAMP phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor, apremilast, improves clinical outcomes for a subset of patients with psoriasis. We asked whether aberrant monocyte subsets or transcriptomic pathways can function as biomarkers of psoriasis endotypes that can predict enhanced clinical responses to cAMP phosphodiesterase inhibition. A 16-week open-label study of 22 patients with monocyte flow cytometric and transcriptomic analysis was performed. Subjects with elevated hyperadhesive monocyte doublets at baseline were more likely to be responders to apremilast (P < .0001); 82% of subjects with elevated hyperadhesive monocyte doublets achieved 50% reduction in PASI compared with 46% in those without elevated doublets. We observed a significant reduction in hyperadhesive monocyte-containing doublets and monocyte-platelet aggregates, suggesting an effect of apremilast on the adhesiveness of blood monocytes during chronic inflammation. Monocyte differentially expressed gene transcripts predictive of clinical response uncovered pharmacoendotypes with distinct patterns of nucleotide metabolism, energetics, and differentiation. Further study to understand the basis of drug responsiveness and to develop an apremilast psoriasis treatment algorithm using monocyte-refined gene expression is required to validate and become practical in clinical use, offering patients a test that personalizes their likelihood of clinical response.

Improved Quality of Life in Patients with Psoriasis Receiving Apremilast: Real-World Data from the Netherlands

INTRODUCTION

Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory condition that can significantly impact the quality of life (QoL), regardless of the level of skin involvement. Apremilast is indicated for the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis. Real-world data regarding the impact of apremilast on patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice in the Netherlands is lacking.

METHODS

The prospective, multicenter observational Apremilast in Real-Life Psoriasis Treatment (APRIL) study enrolled patients ≥ 18 years old with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis receiving apremilast in clinical practice in the Netherlands. Patients were followed-up for 12 months, with assessments scheduled at 6 and 12 months. The primary outcome was Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) response (score ≤ 5 or ≥ 5-point improvement from baseline) at 6 months. Secondary patient-reported outcomes included EQ-5D and skin-specific parameters; exploratory outcomes were Patient Benefit Index (PBI) and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI).

RESULTS

Of the 155 patients enrolled (February 2016-June 2019), 153 received apremilast; 69 (45%) and 39 (26%) continued treatment at 6 and 12 months, respectively. Psoriasis in special areas was common (scalp, 65%; nail, 51%; palmoplantar, 27%). Most patients (92%) had received prior systemic antipsoriatic therapies. Of the 151 patients with a baseline DLQI value, 56 (37%) achieved DLQI response at 6 months. Mean (standard deviation) PBI scores were 3.5 (1.2) and 3.8 (1.1) at 6 and 12 months, respectively. Improvements in DLQI, EQ-5D, and WPAI scores and disease signs and symptoms, including itch and special areas, were observed at 6 and 12 months. Adverse events were consistent with the known safety profile.

CONCLUSIONS

In the Netherlands, patients with moderate to severe psoriasis receiving apremilast for up to 12 months reported improved disease-related QoL, skin involvement, and patient-reported outcomes. These data add to the growing body of evidence demonstrating apremilast is an effective treatment for psoriasis, itch, and special areas (scalp and palms).

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02652494.

Efficacy and safety of apremilast and phototherapy versus phototherapy only in psoriasis vulgaris

Phototherapy and apremilast (oral phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor) are well-known in the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis vulgaris. However, current evidence on the efficacy and safety of their combination is not sufficient. This multicenter, randomized controlled study compared the efficacy and safety between phototherapy as monotherapy and phototherapy and apremilast as combination therapy in patients with psoriasis vulgaris. Patients with moderate to severe psoriasis vulgaris were assigned to combination (n = 29) and monotherapy (n = 13) groups. All patients underwent an 8-week phototherapy regimen comprising irradiation with narrowband UV-B. The patients in the combination group were also administered 10 mg to 60 mg of oral apremilast. We evaluated the improvement percentage based on the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score from baseline to week 8. Additionally, we evaluated the percentage of patients who achieved ≥75% improvement; changes in body surface area (BSA) and scores of EuroQol 5-dimensions 5-level, Dermatology Life Quality Index, and visual analog scale for pruritis from baseline to 4 and 8 weeks; and adverse events. Compared with the monotherapy group, the combination group had significantly lower PASI scores at 4 and 8 weeks and more patients who achieved a PASI score improvement of ≥75% at 8 weeks. Both groups exhibited a significant decrease in BSA; at 8 weeks, no significant difference was observed between the two groups, although the combination group tended toward a greater reduction in BSA. The intergroup differences in the changes at the three time points were not significant. Adverse events were more frequent in the combination group than in the monotherapy group. Our findings suggest that an 8-week combined apremilast and phototherapy regimen may not be adequate in patients for improvements in their subjective assessment of psoriasis, and longer treatment periods may be necessary.

Efficacy and Safety of Apremilast Monotherapy in moderate-to-severe Plaque Psoriasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Psoriasis is a chronic, inflammatory, immune-mediated disease of the skin and joints. Plaque psoriasis is the most common clinical phenotype of psoriasis. Apremilast is an oral phosphodiesterase type 4 inhibitor recently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the management of plaque psoriasis. To assess the efficacy and safety of apremilast monotherapy for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. This systematic review included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing apremilast 20 mg twice daily (BID) and 30 mg BID with placebo for its efficacy on plaque psoriasis. We searched the Embase, Medline, and CENTRAL databases. We sought to evaluate the following outcomes: psoriasis area and severity index score (PASI)-50, PASI-75, PASI-90, static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA), and adverse events. The risk ratio (RR) was used to represent dichotomous outcomes and adverse events, and the data were pooled using the inverse variance weighting method. Eight RCTs that enrolled 2635 participants were deemed eligible. Apremilast 30 mg BID and 20 mg BID were significantly more efficacious than placebo in achieving PASI-75 over 16 weeks (RR = 4.60, 95% CI 3.29-6.41, and RR = 3.15, 95% CI 1.96-5.07, respectively). Apremilast 30 mg BID showed a significantly higher rate of adverse events than the placebo (RR = 1.24, 95% CI 1.16-1.33), whereas apremilast 20 mg BID did not exhibit any significant difference (RR = 1.13, 95% CI 0.91-1.42). This meta-analysis demonstrated that apremilast monotherapy is an effective therapeutic option for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis with acceptable tolerability and safety profile.

A real-world, non-interventional, prospective study of the effectiveness and safety of apremilast in bio-naïve adults with moderate plaque psoriasis treated in the routine care in Greece - The 'APRAISAL' study

BACKGROUND

Real-world data in patients with moderate psoriasis treated with apremilast is limited.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of apremilast in bio-naïve patients with moderate psoriasis in real-world clinical settings.

METHODS

This was a 52-week multicenter, observational, prospective study of adult outpatients with moderate psoriasis {[10%<body surface area<20% or 10<psoriasis area severity index (PASI)<20] and 10<dermatology quality of life index (DLQI)<20} initiated on apremilast ≤7 days before enrollment. Missing data were imputed using the last observation carried forward method.

RESULTS

A total of 287 eligible patients (median age: 54.2 years; median psoriasis duration: 9.8 years) were consecutively enrolled. At baseline, the median DLQI and PASI scores were 12.0 and 11.8, respectively. The 52-week DLQI ≤5 and PASI75 response rates were 68.3% and 61.0%. At 52 weeks, 70.8% and 72.7% of the patients shifted from moderate/severe/very severe to clear/minimal scalp and palmoplantar psoriasis involvement, respectively; the pruritus severity state improved in 67.2%. The 52-week Kaplan-Meier estimated drug continuation rate was 85.3%. The adverse drug reaction rate was 19.9%.

CONCLUSIONS

Apremilast is a safe and effective treatment for bio-naïve patients with moderate psoriasis and specific psoriasis manifestations.

Long-term efficacy and safety of apremilast in the treatment of plaques psoriasis: A real-world, single-center experience

Apremilast is a small molecule approved for the treatment of plaques psoriasis and adult psoriatic arthritis. Pivotal studies have demonstrated short and long term efficacy and safety of apremilast but few data in real life are still available. The aim of this study is to report the efficacy and safety results of apremilast in clinical practice in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis, focusing on therapeutic results obtained after 24 and 52 weeks of treatment. From May 2018 to December 2018, 40 patients with plaques psoriasis have been enrolled. Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI), body surface area, Physician Global Assessment, and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) were performed at baseline at 24 (W24) and 52 (W52) weeks after treatment initiation. Primary endpoint was to evaluate the percentage of patient that achieved PASI 75, PASI 90 and PASI 100 at week 24 and 52 of treatment. Additional measure of efficacy was percentage of patients reaching the minimal disease activity (MDA = PGA0/1 and DLQI 0/1) after 24 and 52 weeks of treatment. As secondary endpoint, we evaluated the percentage of patient that achieved DLQI 0-1 at W24 and W52, and long-term safety of apremilast. The percentage of patients who achieved PASI75, PASI90 and PASI100 was 47.5%, 30% and 10% and 25%, 35% and 10% at W24 and W52 respectively. About the half of the reported patients reached MDA at W24 (n = 21) and at W52 (n = 20). The 60% of patients achieved and maintained DLQI 0-1 at W24 until W52. Diarrhea, nausea, headache, insomnia, and other AEs have been reported by 28 patients. Apremilast in real life experience confirmed the levels of efficacy and safety obtained in pivotal trials. In particular, the good initial response to the treatment is predictive of the maintenance or improvement of the outcome over W52. The efficacy is supported by an excellent safety profile even in frail patients.

Use of apremilast in the psoriasis treatment: a real-life multicentre Italian experience

BACKGROUND

Apremilast is the first small molecule approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis in adult patients; however, real-life data are still limited. We investigated the effectiveness and safety of this drug in a multicentre real-world setting.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed data from all psoriatic patients who received at least one dose of apremilast, collecting demographic data and medical history, at baseline and periodically until 36 months.

RESULTS

A total of 111 patients entered in the study. The mean drug survival duration was 21.8±10.6 months, significantly shorter when comorbidities were≥3 and if biologic drugs were previously administered.ΔPASI90 was achieved in 29% of patients and ΔPASI50 in 68% at T4;the rate of ΔPASI improvement increased progressively at T12, T24, T36 in patients who continued to receive apremilast.At the end of the study 50 patients discontinued the treatment because of adverse events (19.8%), primary failure(19%) or secondary failure(6.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

Apremilast proved to be an effective, safe, and manageable drug, showing effectiveness also in difficult-to-treat patients with psoriasis, with a favourable tolerability profile and a potentially valid weight loss effect. We believe that treating patients with few comorbidities who are naive to biological therapy may result in higher response rates and longer mean drug survival.

Immunoregulatory complement receptor-1 and leukocyte-associated Ig-like receptor-1 expression on leukocytes in Psoriasis vulgaris

Psoriasis vulgaris (PsV) is an immune-mediated inflammatory disorder with devastating psychosocial consequences. Expression of immunoregulator molecules on leukocytes in PsV remains unclear. Leukocyte-associated Ig-like receptor-1 (LAIR-1) and complement receptor-1 (CR-1) are immunoregulator receptors reported to bind complement component 1q involved in phagocytosis. We aimed to explore if altered leukocyte expression of LAIR-1 and CR-1 is associated with PsV. This case-control study included 36 PsV patients and 36 healthy controls. Neutrophils, monocytes and B and T cells were examined by flow cytometry for LAIR-1 and CR-1 mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) and positive cell percentage. Comparison between both groups revealed a significant decrease in LAIR-1 MFI on neutrophils and T cells (P < 0.001 and P = 0.003, respectively). CR-1 MFI on neutrophils, monocytes and T cells also showed a significant decrease in patients (P = 0.033, P = 0.001 and P = 0.040, respectively). There was a significant positive correlation of LAIR-1 MFI on neutrophils with CR-1 MFI on neutrophils (r = 0.503; P = 0.002) and LAIR-1 MFI on monocytes with CR-1 MFI on monocytes (r = 0.371; P = 0.026). Receiver operating characteristic curves revealed that CR-1 MFI on monocytes had the highest discrimination power to differentiate patients from controls, with 86.1% specificity and 75% sensitivity (P = 0.001). In conclusion, altered leukocytes expression of LAIR-1 and CR-1 is associated with PsV. Down-regulated CR-1 MFI on monocytes is a promising diagnostic biomarker for PsV.