A Randomized Study to Evaluate the Efficacy Fractional CO2Laser, Microneedling and Platelet Rich Plasma in Post-Acne Scarring

Comparing the efficacy and safety of microneedling and its combination with other treatments in patients with acne scars: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

This study aimed to analyze the efficacy and safety of microneedling (MN), both alone and in combination with other treatments, to refine the approach for treating acne scars using MN. We systematically searched Pubmed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science for randomized controlled trials examining MN or its combinations in patients with acne scars. All statistical analyses were performed using Stata 18 software. A total of 24 studies involving 1546 participants were included. The analysis revealed that MN combined with chemical peels (CP) exhibited the best results in terms of degree of improvement, patient satisfaction, and treatment efficacy compared to other treatments examined, including MN alone, MN with hyaluronic acid (HA), MN with botulinum toxin‑A (TA), MN with platelet-rich plasma (PRP), PRP alone, CP, and laser therapy. The results for MN combined with additional treatments were obviously better than for MN alone. Side effects such as erythema, pain, and post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation showed no significant differences across all treatments assessed.

A Network Meta-analysis to Explore the Effectiveness of the Different Treatment Modalities in Acne Scars

BACKGROUND

Multiple treatments are used to treat acne scars, but comparing the effectiveness of these treatments have not been studied yet. This research aimed to conduct a complete analysis of the effectiveness of commonly used therapies in acne scars.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane's Library (Cochrane Center Register of Controlled Trials) databases were searched through May 2023. We used patient satisfaction score as the primary outcome and Goodman Baron qualitative scar grading system as the secondary outcome to evaluate the effectiveness of different commonly used therapies for acne scarring, including laser, microneedling (MN), platelet-rich plasma (PRP), autologous fat grafting and combined therapies.

RESULTS

Herein, 495 patients from 13 studies were included. Our results showed that PRP combined with laser was the most effective among therapies in treating acne scars. Ranking of effectiveness by the surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) curve for patient satisfaction score was as following: PRP + laser (96.2%) > laser (71.2%) > MN (45.5%) > MN + PRP (42.0%) > autologous fat grafting (24.5%) > PRP (20.5%). Additionally, ranking of effectiveness by the SUCRA curve for Goodman Baron qualitative scar grading system was as following: PRP + laser (86.3%) > laser (64.2%) > MN + PRP (54.2%) > MN (37.2%) > PRP (8.1%).

CONCLUSION

This network meta-analysis indicated that the combined therapy of PRP and laser might be the most effective. Additionally, more high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed to verify our findings.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE I

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors   www.springer.com/00266 .

Efficacy of Microneedling and CO2 Laser for Acne Scar Remodelling: A Comprehensive Review

Acne scarring is a prevalent issue affecting millions worldwide, with significant psychological and social implications. Microneedling and CO2 laser therapy have emerged as promising modalities for acne scar remodelling. Microneedling induces controlled micro-injuries to stimulate collagen production, while CO2 laser therapy precisely ablates scar tissue. This comprehensive review evaluates the efficacy, safety, and comparative benefits of microneedling and CO2 laser therapy. Literature synthesis reveals both modalities to improve acne scars, albeit with different mechanisms and risks. Factors influencing treatment selection and the role of combination therapy are discussed. Future directions include optimising protocols and exploring novel techniques. Overall, microneedling and CO2 laser therapy offer valuable options for acne scar management, empowering individuals to address the physical and emotional burden of scarring.

Efficacy and Safety of Transplantation of Autologous Fat, Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) and Stromal Vascular Fraction (SVF) in the Treatment of Acne Scar: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The efficacy and safety evaluation of the transplantation of autologous fat, platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and stromal vascular fraction (SVF) in acne scars has not been completely unified. This article will analyze and process the data of the included studies through evidence-based medicine to evaluate the efficacy and safety of autologous fat grafting, PRP and SVF for acne scar treatment, so as to provide treatment basis and strategy for the clinical treatment of acne scars.

METHODS

We searched the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library databases, CNKI, Wanfang and CQVIP databases for studies published during the time between the establishment of the databases through October 2022. We included studies that report autologous fat grafting, SVF and PRP for patients with acne scars. We excluded repeated publication, researches without full text, incomplete information or inability to conduct data extraction and animal experiments, case report, reviews and systematic reviews. STATA 15.1 software was used to analyze the data.

RESULTS

The findings showed that fat grafting had excellent improvement, marked improvement, moderate improvement and mild improvement rates of 36%, 27%, 18% and 18%, respectively, PRP had excellent improvement, marked improvement, moderate improvement and mild improvement rates of 0%, 26%, 47% and 25%, respectively, and the SVF had excellent improvement, marked improvement, moderate improvement and mild improvement rates of 73%, 25%, 3% and 0%, respectively. Additionally, the pooled results showed that there was no significant difference between PRP treatment and pre-treatment in Goodman and Baron scale score. However, Shetty et al. reported that Goodman and Baron scale score after fat grafting was significantly lower than pre-treatment. The results also showed that after fat grafting treatment, incidence of pain after fat grafting was 70%. After PRP treatment, in addition to pain (17%), there is a higher probability of postinflammatory hyperpigmentation (17%) and hematoma (6%). After SVF treatment, the incidence of postinflammatory hyperpigmentation and hematoma was all 0%.

CONCLUSION

Autologous fat grafting, PRP and SVF are effective for the treatment of acne scars, and the safety of autologous fat grafting, PRP and SVF is acceptable. Autologous fat grafting and SVF may be a better treatment for acne scars than PRP. However, this hypothesis still needs to be tested in the future large randomized controlled trials.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

A Comparative Study on Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Secretome Delivery Using Microneedling and Fractional CO2 Laser for Facial Skin Rejuvenation

Background

The efficacy of adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (ADMSCs) secretome for skin aging has been established, yet no studies hitherto directly investigated the best administration method for such purpose.

Purpose

We aimed to compare microneedling (MN) versus fractional CO₂ laser (FL) as methods of delivery for ADMSCs secretome in the treatment of aging skin.

Patients and Methods

A single-blind, randomized split-face clinical trial was conducted on 30 Indonesian women (aged 35-59 years old) with signs of facial cutaneous senescence. Their initial aging status was assessed by dermoscopy photoaging scale (DPAS) and Janus-III measurement system. In the second and fourth weeks, all participants were treated with both MN and FL, followed by the application of a four-fold concentrated ADMSC secretome. The assignment of which side of the face received MN or FL was done by computer-based randomization. Skin parameters were reevaluated on the fourth and sixth weeks, along with patient satisfaction, level of comfort, preference for administration techniques, and also adverse events experienced during the study. Appropriate statistical analyses were subsequently performed at a significance level of 0.05.

Results

Significant improvements in total DPAS and wrinkles were found in the MN and FL groups at the end of the trial. In contrast, no statistical differences in all parameters were observed between groups in the fourth and sixth weeks. FL scored higher than MN for satisfaction and preference, but lower in terms of comfort. Pain, burning sensation, and itch were the side effects experienced by subjects upon treatment. Two patients had prolonged reddish skin succeeding FL treatment, which relieved with moisturizer application.

Conclusion

Both MN and FL yielded comparable results for improving several skin aging features. However, subjective preference for ADMSCs secretome administration method may differ when considering satisfaction, comfort, and possible adverse events.

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of laser interventions for facial acne scars: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis

Background

There are numerous laser treatments for acne scars in clinical practice. However, there are no clinical studies comparing all laser methods to provide an evidence-based bias for clinicians to choose the best strategy. Therefore, this systematic review and network meta-analysis was conducted to explore the efficacy of different types of laser treatment on acne scars. This study can provide the most effective treatment for acne scars in clinical practice.

Methods

The databases of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched from their inception to July 2022. The Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool was used to assess the bias of the included original studies. Bayesian network meta-analysis was used to investigate the efficacy of laser treatment strategies in scar improvement, cure rate, and satisfaction.

Results

As shown by the results, the top 3 treatment options for scar improvement were fractional carbon dioxide laser (FCL) + platelet-rich-plasma (PRP) [surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA): 0.699], 1064Nd (1,064-nm neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet picosecond laser) + 15%VC (Vitamin C; SUCRA: 0.675), and 1064Nd (SUCRA: 0.627). The standard mean difference (SMD) of FCL + PRP was -1.76 (95% CI: -3.49, -0.03), compared with that of FCL. The top 3 treatment options for improving cure rate were Er (Er:YAG laser treatment) + PRP (SUCRA: 0.873), FCL (SUCRA: 0.773), and FCL + 30% salicylic acid (30%SC) (SUCRA: 0.772). The RR of Er + PRP cure rate was 13.86 (95% CI: 1.79, 107.22), compared with non-laser radiofrequency therapy.

Conclusions

The findings suggested that combined therapies should be used to treat acne scars. Er + PRP showed the highest cure rate of acne scar, followed by FCL + 30%SC or FCL monotherapy. FCL combined with PRP could improve acne scarring to the greatest extent, and 1064Nd combined with 15%VC can also exert a good effect. As for satisfaction, FCL monotherapy was the most satisfactory methods for patients, followed by PRP monotherapy. Therefore, Er + PRP and FCL + PRP can be used as the first choice for clinical treatment of acne scars. Additionally, using FCL alone is also an effective and elective treatment method due to its affordable cost and comfort.

A systematic review of evaluating the efficacy of acne scar treatment by Fractional Laser with or without using adjunctive treatments

Fractional laser (FL) resurfacing has proved its effectiveness in acne scars treatments. To evaluate the efficacy of Fractional laser systems for treatment of acne scars as a monotherapy, and as adjunctive therapy with other treatment types. A systematic literature review was performed by searching the electronic databases PubMed, Google Scholar, and Embase. Fractional laser has proven therapeutic efficacy of over 26% in treating acne scars, with minor and transient side effects, and well-tolerant pain. The application of PRP not only accelerated recovery and reduced adverse events, but also enhanced localized collagen neogenesis and redistribution. The addition of surgical treatments to Fractional Laser Systemes (FLS) therapy delivers the best treatment results for Icepick scars. Fractional laser is an effective tool for treating acne scars. The degree of effectiveness varies according to the laser parameters, the number of treatment sessions, skin photo type, the severity and the type of scars. The application of Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) and Fractional Radiofrequency Microneedle (FRM) in addition to the FL treatment improves the therapeutic efficacy and reduces the appearance of Post Inflammatory Hyper-Pigmentation (PIH), and is the ideal treatment for dark-skinned patients. FL therapy along with surgical methods such as subsicion and punch techniques provided the best improvements for deep scars.

Platelet-Rich Plasma in Aesthetics

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is being used as a treatment modality for skin rejuvenation since the last decade. There has been a lot of ambiguity regarding the ideal protocol to be followed and the specific indications where its use should be promoted. The use of PRP as monotherapy for skin rejuvenation, acne scars, periorbital rejuvenation, lipofilling and in combination with fractional CO₂ and other resurfacing modalities is increasing rapidly. In this article, we have reviewed the current scientific evidence available and the IADVL national task force for PRP has come up with standard recommendations for use of PRP in esthetics along with the grade of evidence and strength of recommendation for each indication. The aim of this review is to provide a standard protocol for use of PRP in esthetics, for clinicians and academicians, leading to excellent results with this promising treatment modality.