Recent advancements in regional anaesthesia

Practice and challenges related to regional anesthesia in Amhara regional hospitals, Northwest-Ethiopia: a web-based survey study

BACKGROUND

Regional anesthesia (RA) can improve patient outcomes and reduce perioperative complications including deaths. Despite its benefits, RA is less utilised in low-resource settings. The purpose of this study was to assess practice and challenges related to RA in Amhara Regional Hospitals, Northwest-Ethiopia.

METHODS

A web- based survey was distributed among 360 anesthetists working in Amhara Regional Hospitals, Northwest-Ethiopia from November 15 - January 30, 2023. An English, semi-structure, self-administered questionnaire was disseminated by email and telegram following ethical clearance. The survey included questions about the use of RA, socio-demographic characteristics of anesthetist, types of practiced regional blocks, and barriers to perform RA. All volunteer respondents who filled online questionnaire during study period were included. The data were coded and analyzed using statistical package for social Sciences (SPSS) software-version 20. Both inferential and descriptive statistics were used to describe the results.

RESULTS

The overall response rate was 63.3% (223 out of 360 completed surveys). A total of 132 respondents (36.7%) did not provide a response, and 5 respondents (1.4%) submitted incomplete) surveys. The most frequently self-reported barriers to performing peripheral nerve blocks were a lack of equipment (regional procedure kit including block needle, ultrasound, nerve stimulator, or epidural set) 185 (82.9%), lack of knowledge 171(76.7%), lack of practical skills 112 (50.2%), and lack of drugs/medication 50 (22.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

The principal findings indicate that all respondents perform spinal anaesthesia, while the practice of peripheral RA varies. Reported barriers to performing RA are related to knowledge and training, as well as a lack of equipment (there aren't enough regional procedure kits available that include an epidural set, block needle, nerve stimulator, and ultrasound). A more stringent approach with specific requirements, distinguishing between neuraxial and peripheral blocks, enhance training opportunities for peripheral nerve blocks are required in Ethiopia.

Optimizing Regional Anesthesia for Cancer Patients: A Comprehensive Review of Current Practices and Future Directions

Regional anesthesia has emerged as a pivotal component in the perioperative management of cancer patients, offering several advantages over traditional general anesthesia. By providing targeted pain relief and minimizing systemic exposure to opioids, regional anesthesia reduces the risk of opioid-related side effects and enhances postoperative recovery. Regional anesthesia may positively influence oncological outcomes by attenuating the surgical stress response and preserving immune function, potentially reducing cancer recurrence and metastasis. This review comprehensively explores the current practices and benefits of regional anesthesia in the oncology setting, including various techniques such as nerve blocks, epidural anesthesia, and spinal anesthesia. It examines the challenges associated with its application in cancer patients, including technical difficulties and patient-related factors. It evaluates the existing evidence regarding its impact on cancer progression and patient survival. Additionally, the review discusses future directions in the field, emphasizing the need for personalized anesthesia strategies, further research into the long-term effects of regional anesthesia on cancer outcomes, and the development of innovative approaches to enhance its efficacy and safety. By addressing these areas, this review aims to provide a thorough understanding of how to optimize regional anesthesia for cancer patients, ultimately contributing to improved perioperative care and better long-term outcomes.

Regional anesthesia is safe for use in intramedullary nailing of low-energy tibial shaft fractures

PURPOSE

The purpose was to compare perioperative outcomes of patients who underwent general or regional anesthesia for intramedullary (IM) nailing of tibial shaft fractures (TSFs).

METHODS

Retrospective chart review was performed on a consecutive series of low-energy TSF patients who presented to a single academic medical center and a level 1 trauma center who underwent operative repair with a reamed IM nail. Collected information included demographics, injury information, anesthesia type (general or regional i.e. peripheral nerve block), intra-operative opiate consumption (converted to morphine milliequivalents [MME], and post-operative pain visual-analog scale [VAS] pain scores. Patients were divided into 3 groups based on the type of anesthesia received and univariate analysis was performed to compare the 3 groups.

RESULTS

Seventy-six patients were included, with an average age of 44.47±16.0 years. There were 38 (50 %) who were administered general anesthesia and 38 (50 %) who were administered regional anesthesia in the form of a peripheral nerve block. There were no differences between the groups with respect to demographics, medical co-morbidities, rate of open fractures or AO/OTA fracture classification. Regional anesthesia patients received less intra-operative MME than general anesthesia patients (17.57±10.6, 28.96±13.8, p < 0.001). Patients who received regional anesthesia also spent less time in the operating room, received less MME on post-operative day 1, and ambulated further on post-operative day 1, however none of these differences were statistically significant. There were no cases of missed post-operative compartment syndrome or complications related to the administration of the peripheral nerve block.

CONCLUSIONS

Regional anesthesia in TSF surgery received less intra-operative opioid requirements, without any untoward effects.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III.

Comparison of the Efficacy Between Ultrasound-Guided Paravertebral Block and Erector Spinae Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Using Levobupivacaine: A Prospective and Randomized Study

Introduction Various techniques have been developed in the current era of regional anesthesia practice. With the advent of ultrasound, the visualization of needle and pleura in real time enables a better outcome with negligible adverse events. This study was designed to compare the efficacy between ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) and paravertebral block (PVB) in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for the duration of postoperative analgesia with levobupivacaine, a local anesthetic with higher lipid solubility, making it more potent and resulting in a longer duration of action. Methods This prospective randomized single-blinded study enrolled 50 patients of ASA grades I and II, aged between 20 and 60 years, who were scheduled for PCNL under general anesthesia. Patients were divided into two groups of 25 each: group ESPB and group PVB, and 25 mL of 0.25% levobupivacaine was administered to both groups. They were primarily evaluated for the duration of postoperative analgesia. Total rescue analgesic requirements, hemodynamic parameters, and any adverse effects were also assessed. Results Both ESPB and PVB provided a significant duration of analgesia postoperatively. Demographic characteristics in both groups were comparable. The duration of postoperative analgesia in group ESPB was 746 ± 58.6 minutes when compared to group PVB, which is 768 ± 68.6 minutes (p = 0.08). Intravenous (IV) paracetamol was used as a rescue analgesic. The doses used were also comparable in both groups, with the visual analog score (VAS) being high after around 12 hours of surgery. The total rescue analgesic requirement was similar in both groups (group ESPB, 2.0 ± 1.6; group PVB, 2.2 ± 1.4; p = 0.51). There were no significant hemodynamic or other adverse effects in either group. Conclusion We conclude that both ESPB and PVB using isobaric levobupivacaine 0.25% as a local anesthetic are equally efficacious in providing effective postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing PCNL under general anesthesia.

Comparison of the classical approach and costoclavicular approach of ultrasound-guided infraclavicular block: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background and Aims

The infraclavicular brachial plexus block (ICB) provides analgesia and anaesthesia of the upper limb. It is given using the classical or the more recently described costoclavicular (CC) approach at the level of cords. This systematic review aimed to assess which approach is better for the ICB in terms of onset, performance, and safety.

Methods

This PROSPERO (vide registration number CRD42022361636) registered meta-analysis included randomised trials of patients undergoing upper limb surgery in ultrasound-guided ICB from MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and IRCTP from inception to March 2023. The quality of evidence was assessed using GradePro software. The primary outcomes were sensory and motor block onset time and the number of patients having complete block at 30 minutes. Secondary outcomes included block performance time (BPT), number of attempts, duration of the block, and any incidence of complications.

Results

Five trials with 374 adult patients (classic = 185, CC = 189) were included. No significant difference was found in the sensory (Mean difference (MD): 1.44 minutes [95% confidence interval (CI): 3.06, 5.95]; I2 = 95%; very low level of evidence (LOE); P = 0.53) and motor block onset times (MD: 0.83 minutes [95% CI: 0.96, 2.62]; I2 = 84%; very low LOE P = 0.36) and BPT (MD: 5.06 seconds [95% CI: 38.50, 48.63]; I2 = 98%; very low LOE; P = 0.82) in classic and CC approach of ICB. Trial sequential analysis revealed our sample size to be 0.65% of the required sample size to achieve 80% power, deeming our study underpowered.

Conclusion

Costoclavicular approach was not superior or inferior to the classical technique for infraclavicular brachial plexus block. However, the quality of evidence is low and further studies are needed to corroborate the findings.

Novel Techniques for Musculoskeletal Pain Management after Orthopedic Surgical Procedures: A Systematic Review

Effective postoperative pain management is critical for recovery after orthopedic surgery, but often remains inadequate despite multimodal analgesia. This systematic review synthesizes evidence on innovative modalities for enhancing pain control following major orthopedic procedures. Fifteen randomized controlled trials and comparative studies evaluating peripheral nerve blocks, local anesthetic infiltration, cryotherapy, transcutaneous electrical stimulation, adjunct medications, and other techniques are included. Thematic analysis reveals that peripheral nerve blocks and local anesthetic infiltration consistently demonstrate reduced pain scores, opioid consumption, and side effects versus conventional analgesia alone. Oral multimodal medications also show promise as part of opioid-sparing regimens. Adjunctive approaches like cryotherapy, music, and dexmedetomidine require further research to optimize protocols. Despite promising innovations, critical knowledge gaps persist regarding comparative effectiveness, optimal interventions and dosing, combination strategies, cost-effectiveness, and implementation. High-quality randomized controlled trials using standardized protocols are essential to guide the translation of enhanced multimodal regimens into clinical practice. This review provides a framework for pursuing research priorities and advancing evidence-based postoperative pain management across orthopedic surgeries.

Lateral Decubitus Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block in Transverse Myelitis

Transverse myelitis is a rare inflammatory condition typically presenting with symptoms like muscle weakness, sensory issues, and problems affecting bowel and bladder function. In this study, we describe the successful anesthesia management of an adult patient with transverse myelitis exhibiting spastic paralysis and compromised cardiopulmonary reserves, whose preferred resting position was lateral decubitus. Targeted anesthesia was administered via a supraclavicular approach to the brachial plexus block for wrist deformity fixation surgery, mitigating the pulmonary complications associated with general anesthesia, achieving earlier recovery, and avoiding the use of opioids. This case underscores the significance of customizing the patient's personalized positioning, while also highlighting the potential for effective regional anesthesia in atypical positions. We illustrate the successful use of supraclavicular brachial plexus block for left wrist deformity fixation and debridement surgery in the lateral decubitus, the most convenient position for the transverse myelitis patient with spastic paraplegia.