All India Difficult Airway Association guidelines in practice-A survey

How China anesthesiologists document and communicate difficult airway management

BACKGROUND

According to the Chinese Society of Anesthesiology, it is recommended that patients with difficult airways be documented and notified, which will provide healthcare professionals with a direct reference when managing airways. However, compliance with this initiative remains unclear. This study was conducted to investigate the current status and need for difficult airway notification at Plastic Surgery Hospital and to explore the factors contributing to noncompliance.

METHODS

Anesthesiologists, surgeons, and patients in Plastic Surgery Hospital were administered separate questionnaires regarding notification of difficult airway management. Participants were surveyed regarding their attitudes and current practices regarding difficult airway notification. In addition, questions were asked regarding the barriers that contribute to noncompliance.

RESULTS

A total of 632 valid responses were obtained and analyzed, giving a response rate of 99.21%. 399 patients (89.46%) felt it was very important for anesthesiologists to inform them about their difficult airway, and 91.03% felt it was very important for them to receive a letter of their airway assessment. However, twenty-two anesthesiologists (64.7%) reported verbally informing less than 50% of patients about their difficult airway after surgery, and only four anesthesiologists informed all patients they encountered. Most surgeons (91.22%) and anesthesiologists (91.18%) believe that it is vital to inform patients verbally, while 114 surgeons (77.03%) and 31 anesthesiologists (91.18%) believe that it is essential to complete a difficult airway notification alert. Among the factors causing noncompliance, 17 (34.69%) believed that absence of mandatory rules, 9 (18.37%) believed that increased workload, and 8 (16.33%) believed that notification methods were lacking.

CONCLUSIONS

The compliance to difficult airway notification remains low in Plastic Surgery Hospital despite the high incidence of difficult airways. Although anesthesiologists, surgeons, and patients are strongly in favor of it. Among the barriers to compliance were the absence of a well-developed notification system and a means of notification such as an alert form for difficult airways. This may spur the anesthesiology society to publish the notification system.

Current practice pattern among anaesthesiologists for difficult airway management: A nationwide cross-sectional survey

Background and Aims

The practice patterns for airway management vary among anaesthesiologists, depending on various setups and geographical divides. This survey assessed practice patterns in unanticipated difficult intubation and cannot intubate or cannot ventilate (CICV) situations/complete ventilation failure among Indian anaesthesiologists'.

Methods

A validated questionnaire of 22 items related to practice preferences for airway management among anaesthesiologists was sent to Indian Society of Anaesthesiologists members online through Google Forms and distributed manually to delegates in continuing medical education programme.

Results

A total of 535 responses were obtained and analysed. In unanticipated difficult laryngoscopy and intubation, the order of preference for alternative airway devices was video laryngoscope (VL, 60.1%), intubating laryngeal mask airway/laryngeal mask airway (23.5%), fibreoptic bronchoscope (13.5%) and optical stylets (1.2%). Advanced difficult airway devices were unavailable in most nursing homes and government non-teaching hospitals. Seventy per cent of respondents experienced CICV situations at least once, most during head and neck surgeries. In CICV situations, the order of choice for the front-of-neck airway access was cricothyroidotomy (CT) by narrow bore cannula (48.9%), tracheostomy by the surgeon (30%), Seldinger CT (12.5%), open surgical CT (5.4%) and scalpel bougie CT (3.2%).

Conclusion

The VL was the most preferred airway rescue device in unanticipated difficult intubation, and intravenous catheter cricothyroidotomy was the most selected technique in CICV situations.

Evaluation of thyromental height test in prediction of difficult airway in obese surgical patients: An observational study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Thyromental height test (TMHT) has revealed good potentials for predicting difficult laryngoscopy view (DLV) in non-obese patients, but its accuracy in obese patients is not evident. This study aimed to assess the validity of TMHT as a predictor of DLV in obese surgical patients.

METHODS

105 patients, aged 18-60 years, with body mass index (BMI) >30 kg/m², scheduled for elective surgeries under general anaesthesia with an endotracheal tube inserted using conventional laryngoscope were included. Airway was assessed with TMHT, modified Mallampati test (MMT), neck circumference (NC) and NC/TMHT ratio. The DLV was defined as Cormack-Lehane grade ≥3. The primary endpoint was the validity of TMHT as a predictor of DLV. The secondary endpoints were to compare the accuracy of TMHT with that of the NC, MMT and NC/TMHT ratio as predictors of the difficult airway.

RESULTS

The BMI was 43.7 ± 6.6 kg/m². The DLV cases were 23/105 (21.9%). The MMT, TMHT and NC/TMHT ratio had the best predictive ability of DLV with areas under receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.91, 0.92 and 0.80; at cut-off values >2, <47 mm and >7.9, respectively. MMT and TMHT were the only predictors of DLV by multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

In obese surgical patients, TMHT is an excellent predictor of DLV when the cut-off value is <47 mm.

Tracheal intubation practices and adverse events in trauma victims on arrival to trauma triage: A single centre prospective observational study

Background and Aims:

Trauma is one of the leading causes of global disease burden. Data on airway management in trauma patients from developing countries, particularly India is sparse. Hence, we planned a prospective observational study to assess the airway management practice patterns and associated complications.

Methods:

The study was conducted in trauma triage of a tertiary care hospital. Data was collected on all tracheal intubations occurring in trauma victims requiring definitive airway control, a detailed proforma including patient details, mode of injury, drugs used, intubation procedure, and complications were filled out for each patient.

Results:

We observed that the airway in trauma patients was primarily managed by non-anaesthesia speciality residents (426 patients); anaesthesia residents were primarily called for deferred or difficult intubations. The first attempt success rate of intubation by anaesthesia residents was significantly higher than speciality residents (P = 0.0001; 95% CI 9.02-24.66). Non-anaesthesia residents used midazolam in varying doses (3-12 mg) for intubation, whereas, rapid sequence intubation was the most common technique used by anaesthesia residents. Airway injuries were the most frequent complication observed in 32.8% of patients intubated by specialty residents compared to 5.9% of patients intubated by anaesthesia residents.

Conclusion:

The trauma triage is a high-volume area for frequent tracheal intubations which are manned by non-anaesthesia speciality teams. A number of factors related to the patient, staff, availability of airway equipment and unfavourable surroundings impact airway management and may explain the high incidence of airway complications, such as airway injuries in these trauma victims.