Single bolus dose of epidural magnesium prolongs the duration of analgesia in cardiac patients undergoing vascular surgeries

The impact of magnesium on shivering incidence in cardiac surgery patients: A systematic review

Background and objective

This scientific review involves a sequential analysis of randomized trial research focused on the incidence of shivering in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. The study conducted a comprehensive search of different databases, up to the end of 2020. Only randomized trials comparing magnesium administration with either placebo or no treatment in patients expected to experience shivering were included. The primary objective was to evaluate shivering occurrence, distinguishing between patients receiving general anesthesia and those not. Secondary outcomes included serum magnesium concentrations, intubation time, post-anesthesia care unit stay, hospitalization duration, and side effects. Data collection included patient demographics and various factors related to magnesium administration.

Material and methods

This scientific review analyzed 64 clinical trials meeting inclusion criteria, encompassing a total of 4303 patients. Magnesium was administered via different routes, primarily intravenous, epidural, and intraperitoneal, and compared against placebo or control. Data included demographics, magnesium dosage, administration method, and outcomes. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic. Some studies were excluded due to unavailability of data or non-responsiveness from authors.

Result

and discussion: Out of 2546 initially identified articles, 64 trials were selected for analysis. IV magnesium effectively reduced shivering, with epidural and intraperitoneal routes showing even greater efficacy. IV magnesium demonstrated cost-effectiveness and a favorable safety profile, not increasing adverse effects. The exact dose-response relationship of magnesium remains unclear. The results also indicated no significant impact on sedation, extubation time, or gastrointestinal distress. However, further research is needed to determine the optimal magnesium dose and to explore its potential effects on blood pressure and heart rate, particularly regarding pruritus prevention.

Conclusion

This study highlights the efficacy of intravenous (IV) magnesium in preventing shivering after cardiac surgery. Both epidural and intraperitoneal routes have shown promising results. The safety profile of magnesium administration appears favorable, as it reduces the incidence of shivering without significantly increasing costs. However, further investigation is required to establish the ideal magnesium dosage and explore its potential effects on blood pressure, heart rate, and pruritus prevention, especially in various patient groups.

Effectiveness of Magnesium in Preventing Shivering in Surgical Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Clinical trials regarding the antishivering effect of perioperative magnesium have produced inconsistent results. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis with Trial Sequential Analysis to evaluate the effect of perioperative magnesium on prevention of shivering.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and 2 registry sites for randomized clinical trials that compared the administration of magnesium to a placebo or no treatment in patients undergoing surgeries. The primary outcome of this meta-analysis was the incidence of shivering. The incidence of shivering was combined as a risk ratio with 95% CI using a random-effect model. The effect of the route of administration was evaluated in a subgroup analysis, and Trial Sequential Analysis with a risk of type 1 error of 5% and power of 90% was performed. The quality of each included trial was evaluated, and the quality of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. We also assessed adverse events.

RESULTS

Sixty-four trials and 4303 patients (2300 and 2003 patients in magnesium and control groups, respectively) were included. The overall incidence of shivering was 9.9% in the magnesium group and 23.0% in the control group (risk ratio, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.33-0.52). Subgroup analysis revealed that the incidence of shivering was lower with IV (risk ratio, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.29-0.54; Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development, and Evaluation, moderate), epidural (risk ratio, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.13-0.43; Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development, and Evaluation, low), and intrathecal administration (risk ratio, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.43-0.96; Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development, and Evaluation, moderate). Only trials with low risk of bias were included for Trial Sequential Analysis. The Z-cumulative curve for IV magnesium crossed the Trial Sequential Analysis monitoring boundary for benefit even though only 34.9% of the target sample size had been reached. The Z-cumulative curve for epidural or intrathecal administration did not cross the Trial Sequential Analysis monitoring boundary for benefit. No increase in adverse events was reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Perioperative IV administration of magnesium effectively reduced shivering and Trial Sequential Analysis suggested that no more trials are required to confirm that IV magnesium effectively reduces shivering.