Ultrasound-guided transversalis fascia plane block for postoperative analgesia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Ultrasound-guided transversalis fascia plane block or transversus abdominis plane block for recovery after caesarean section: A randomised clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Caesarean section is a widely performed surgical procedure that often results in moderate-to-severe postoperative pain. If left untreated, this pain can lead to short-term and long-term consequences. Transversalis fascia plane (TFP) block and transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block are among the regional anaesthesia techniques employed for managing pain after a caesarean section.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to compare the impact of these two blocks on the quality of recovery in patients undergoing elective caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia.

DESIGN

A single-centre, double-blind, randomised trial.

SETTINGS

Operating room, postanaesthesia recovery unit, and ward in a tertiary hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Ninety-three patients (ASA 2 to 3) were recruited. After exclusion, 79 patients were included in the final analysis: 40 in the TFP block group and 39 in the TAP block group.

INTERVENTIONS

After surgery, participants received either TFP block (20 ml 0.25% bupivacaine for each side) or TAP block (20 ml 0.25% bupivacaine for each side).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was the difference in obstetric quality of recovery 11-Turkish (ObsQoR-11T) scores between groups. Secondary outcomes included pain scores, opioid consumption and incidence of opioid-related complications.

RESULTS

The mean ObsQoR-11T score was higher in the TFP block group compared with the TAP block group (97.13 ± 6.67 points vs. 87.10 ± 9.84 points, respectively; P < 0.001). The pain scores in the TFP block group were slightly lower between postoperative 4 and 24 h. The mean total morphine consumption was 15.08 ± 2.21 mg in the TFP block group and 22.21 ± 3.04 mg in the TAP block group (P < 0.001). More patients required rescue analgesia between 4 and 8 h in the TAP block group [2.00 (5.00%) vs. 9.00 (23.08%), P = 0.02]. No significant differences were observed between groups in terms of opioid-related side effects.

CONCLUSION

TFP block used for analgesic purposes yielded a better quality recovery period than TAP block and also reduced opioid consumption.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05999981).

VISUAL ABSTRACT

http://links.lww.com/EJA/B6.

Comparison of the analgesic efficacy of the ultrasound-guided transversalis fascia plane block and erector spinae plane block in patients undergoing open inguinal hernia repair under spinal anesthesia

BACKGROUND

Open inguinal hernia repair (OIHR) surgery is a common surgical procedure, and ultrasound guided interfascial plane blocks can also be included in current approaches to postoperative multimodal analgesia regimens. This study aimed to compare the postoperative analgesic efficacy of the erector spinae plane block (ESPB) and transversalis fascia plane block (TFPB) in patients undergoing OIHR.

METHODS

This prospective, randomized, assessor-blinded comparative study was conducted in the postoperative recovery room and ward of a tertiary hospital. A total of 80 patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-III were enrolled and allocated equally to either the ESPB or TFPB group. The patients received standard multimodal analgesia in addition to an ultrasound-guided ESPB or TFPB. During the first 24 h postoperatively, tramadol consumption was assessed and pain levels at rest and during movement were compared using numeric rating scale (NRS) scores at 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 h postoperatively.

RESULTS

The results showed no difference in NRS scores at any time point between the groups, except for NRS at rest in the third hour. However, tramadol consumption was lower in the TFPB group than in the ESPB group overall (88 ± 75.2 vs. 131 ± 93.7 mg, respectively; P = 0.027, mean difference: -43, 95% CI [-80.82, -5.18]).

CONCLUSIONS

The TFPB leads to lower tramadol requirements in the first 24 h postoperatively than the ESPB in patients undergoing OIHR.

Comparative evaluation of pre-emptive analgesic efficacy of Posterior Transversus Abdominis Plane block with Fascia Transversalis Plane Block in adult patients undergoing unilateral inguinal hernia repair: A prospective, randomized, single-blind, two-arm parallel study

Introduction

Abdominal wall blocks, in conjunction with multimodal analgesia, have demonstrated efficacy in providing post-operative analgesia, reducing opioid requirements in patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair. The inguinal region is primarily innervated by the ilioinguinal nerve (IIN) and iliohypogastric nerve (IIH). Posterior transverse abdominis plane block (pTAP) and fascia transversalis plane block (TFP) have been observed to reliably block IIN and IIH. We hypothesized that posterior TAP block (pTAP) owing to its potential paravertebral spread will provide better post-operative analgesia than TFP block in patients undergoing unilateral open inguinal hernia repair.

Methods

This prospective, randomized, single-blind, two-arm parallel study was conducted over a duration of one year for which sixty patients undergoing unilateral open inguinal hernia repair under spinal anesthesia were enrolled. They were equally and randomly assigned to receive either preoperative pTAP block or TFP block. The primary aim of the study was to compare median static and dynamic NRS scores during a 24-hour period, with the secondary aim to compare the number of patients who required rescue analgesics in each group.

Results

All enrolled patients completed the study. Results showed no statistically significant difference in median static NRS scores between Group pTAP and Group TFP at the designated time of observation during the 24-hour period [1.2 (0.4-1.60 vs. 1 (0.6-1)]. Group pTAP reported a higher median dynamic NRS scores during the 24-hour period [2.6 (1.2-3) v/s 2 (1.6-2.4); P < 0.035], although this difference was clinically insignificant. The mean time to request for the first rescue analgesia was comparable (11.7 h v/s 12 h; P = 0.99). In all the patients of both groups, loss of pinprick and cold touch sensation was observed at T10, T12, and L1 dermatomal levels. However, sensory assessment at T6 and T8 levels showed variability between the two groups (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

In conjunction with background analgesia and the use of dexamethasone as an adjuvant, both blocks (pTAP and TFP) were observed to be equally effective for post-operative pain relief with similar patient satisfaction scores.

Comparison of ultrasound-guided transversalis fascia and posterior transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative analgesia following caesarean delivery: A double-blinded randomised controlled trial

Background and Aims

Posterior-transversus abdominus plane (TAP) block and transversalis fascia plane (TFP) block have been used for postoperative analgesia following caesarean delivery. We compared the analgesic efficacy of the TAP vs TFP plane blocks in patients undergoing elective caesarean delivery.

Methods

We randomised 90 women undergoing caesarean delivery under spinal anaesthesia to receive either a posterior-TAP (Group-TAP), TFP (Group-TFP) or no block (Group-C) postoperatively. The primary objective was the postoperative analgesic requirements. Secondary objectives were duration of analgesia, pain scores and infra-umbilical sensory loss, which were recorded at specific intervals for 24 h. Statistical analysis was carried out using Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 16.0 software.

Results

The patients requiring one, two or nil rescue analgesics were comparable between the interventions and the control (P = 0.32). The duration of analgesia was longer in Group-TAP when compared to Group-C, 4.76 (1.2) vs. 6.89 (2.4); P < 0.001, whereas Group-TFP, 5.64 (2.1) h, was not significantly different from Group-C. The static pain score in Group-TAP was significantly less than that in Group-C at 4 h and beyond 12 h (P < 0.001), whereas Group-TFP was comparable with Group-C at all time points except at 4 h and 24 h (P = 0.002). Only Group-TAP demonstrated midline infraumbilical sensory loss.

Conclusion

TAP and TFP blocks did not decrease the rescue analgesic requirement compared with the control group. The posterior-TAP block prolonged the duration of analgesia by 2 h, maintained the median static pain score at 0 beyond 12 h, and demonstrated sensory loss at the infraumbilical dermatomes.