Dexmedetomidine as premedication in children: Status at the beginning of 2017

A Comparative Study Between Intranasal and Intravenous Dexmedetomidine and Hemodynamic Responses During Endotracheal Intubation

INTRODUCTION

 Tracheal intubation and laryngoscopy may cause sympathetic stimulation, which can cause tachycardia and hypertension. To abolish the pressor response to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation, many medication combinations have been tried with varying degrees of efficacy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This randomized comparative study was double-blinded and included 106 subjects. Patients including those aged 18-60 belong to the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) 1 and 2. These subjects were divided into two study groups. Group A received dexmedetomidine 0.5mcg/kg (200mcg diluted in 50ml syringe with normal saline (NS) up to 50cc 4mcg/ml) through an infusion pump over 40min before induction. Group B received dexmedetomidine intranasally (1mcg/kg) in undiluted which is prepared from parental preparation (100mcg/ml) and an equivalent dose of NS to the other group. The intranasal drug was dripped into both nostrils in equal volume using a 1ml syringe in a supine head-down position about 40min before induction. Both groups received an intravenous placebo and an intranasal placebo with normal saline.

RESULTS

In our study, intranasal and intravenous groups were compared. There was no statistically significant difference in hemodynamic variables like heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and mean arterial pressure (MAP) between the two groups (majority p value >0.05). Hence both routes can be preferred for attenuation of pressor responses.

CONCLUSION

 Study findings demonstrate dexmedetomidine can be utilized as a premedication to lessen hemodynamic surges during endotracheal intubation with more or less the same efficacy via intranasal and intravenous routes. This result could be attributable to the fact that both intravenous and intranasal dexmedetomidine stop central catecholamine levels from rising.

Attenuation of haemodynamic responses to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation with dexmedetomidine: A comparison between intravenous and intranasal route

Background and Aims:

Haemodynamic changes during endotracheal intubation are major concerns in general anaesthesia This study compared the efficacy of intranasal and intravenous dexmedetomidine (DEX) to attenuate the stress response of laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation.

Methods:

In this prospective, randomised, double-blinded study, 70 adults were divided into two groups [Group D_IV(n=35) and Group D_IN(n=35)]. D_IV group received intravenous dexmedetomidine (DEX) infusion (0.5 μg/kg) over 40 min and D_IN group received intranasal dexmedetomidine (1 μg/kg) 40 min before induction. The primary objective was the comparison the mean arterial pressure (MAP) between two groups from 40 min before induction at every 10 min intervals till induction of anaesthesia, at the time of intubation, thereafter every 1 min interval till 5 min, at 7 min and 10 min after intubation. The secondary outcomes were comparison of heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure along with sedation and other adverse effects. Statistical analysis was with Statistica 6.0 and Graph Pad prism version 5.

Results:

In both the groups, all the haemodynamic parameters were maintained within (20% of baseline values) throughout the study period. There was no statistically significant difference in MAP between two groups (P>0.05). Preoperative sedation score was significantly higher in the D_IV group than the D_IN group (P = 0.014).

Conclusion:

Like IV DEX, intranasal DEX can also attenuate the haemodynamic stress responses of laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation without significant differences in MAP between two groups.