1
|
Upshaw WC, Richey JM, Tassin JP, Frolov MV, Miller BC, Kaye AJ, Sterritt J, Fox CJ, Ahmadzadeh S, Shekoohi S, Kaye AD. IPACK Block Efficacy for Acute Pain Management after Total Knee Replacement: A Review. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2024; 28:673-679. [PMID: 38520494 DOI: 10.1007/s11916-024-01237-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/04/2024] [Indexed: 03/25/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Patients often experience a significant degree of knee pain following total knee replacement (TKR). To alleviate this pain, nerve blocks may be performed such as the adductor canal block (ACB). However, ACBs are unable to relieve pain originating from the posterior region of the knee. A new type of nerve block known as the IPACK block may be used in conjunction with ACBs as it is designed to inhibit nerve branches innervating this area. In this article, we examine the rationale behind the IPACK procedure, how it is performed, and clinical trials examining its efficacy. RECENT FINDINGS 5 of the 7 clinical trials examined in this article showed the IPACK + ACB block to show superior efficacy in treating pain following TKR compared to other blocks. These blocks included PMDI+ACB, SPANK+ACB, PAI+ACB, ACB alone, and SCAB. 2 of the 7 clinical trials showed the IPACK + ACB to be less effective in managing patients pain following TKR compared to other blocks which included the CACB and 4 in 1 block. In most instances, the IPACK + ACB showed superior efficacy in managing patients' pain following TKR when compared to other types of nerve blocks. This was determined by measuring usage of opioids, reported postoperative pain, and length of hospital stays following TKR. Thus, we suppose the IPACK block may be used in conjunction with the ACB to effectively reduce patient's pain following TKR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William C Upshaw
- School of Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center at Shreveport, Shreveport, LA, 71103, USA
| | - John M Richey
- School of Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center at Shreveport, Shreveport, LA, 71103, USA
| | - Joseph P Tassin
- School of Dentistry, Louisiana State University Health Science Center, New Orleans, LA, 70119, USA
| | - Mark V Frolov
- School of Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center at Shreveport, Shreveport, LA, 71103, USA
| | - Benjamin C Miller
- Department of Anesthesiology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center at Shreveport, 1501 Kings Highway, Shreveport, LA, 71103, USA
| | - Aaron J Kaye
- WakeMed Anesthesia, 3000 New Bern Ave, Raleigh, NC, 27610, USA
| | - Jeffrey Sterritt
- Department of Anesthesiology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center at Shreveport, 1501 Kings Highway, Shreveport, LA, 71103, USA
| | - Charles J Fox
- Department of Anesthesiology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center at Shreveport, 1501 Kings Highway, Shreveport, LA, 71103, USA
| | - Shahab Ahmadzadeh
- Department of Anesthesiology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center at Shreveport, 1501 Kings Highway, Shreveport, LA, 71103, USA
| | - Sahar Shekoohi
- Department of Anesthesiology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center at Shreveport, 1501 Kings Highway, Shreveport, LA, 71103, USA.
| | - Alan D Kaye
- Department of Anesthesiology, Department of Pharmacology, Toxicology, and Neurosciences, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center at Shreveport, Shreveport, LA, 71103, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Alabd AS, Moustafa MA, Ahmed AMM. Triple injection peri-sartorius (TIPS) block for postoperative analgesia after total knee arthroplasty: Randomised controlled study. Indian J Anaesth 2024; 68:287-292. [PMID: 38476551 PMCID: PMC10926342 DOI: 10.4103/ija.ija_936_23] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2023] [Revised: 12/26/2023] [Accepted: 12/26/2023] [Indexed: 03/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and Aims Motor-sparing analgesia after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is crucial. The primary endpoint was the postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score after triple injection peri-sartorius (TIPS) block after TKA. Secondary endpoints were postoperative morphine consumption, 24-h postoperative ambulation distances and the degrees of active knee extension. Methods After general anaesthesia or spinal anaesthesia administration and before surgical incision, 80 patients undergoing TKA were randomised into group TIPS (received ultrasound-guided TIPS block where 40 ml 0.25% bupivacaine and 4 mg dexamethasone were injected: 10 ml at the distal femoral triangle, 10 ml above the sartorius and 20 ml at the distal adductor canal) and group FNB (femoral nerve block; received ultrasound-guided FNB with 20 ml 0.25% bupivacaine mixed with 4 mg dexamethasone). Postoperative pain score was noted and compared. Results Dynamic VAS scores were lower in the TIPS group than in FNB, while the resting VAS scores were not significantly different. Mean (standard deviation [SD]) postoperative morphine consumption was 5.82 (2.47) mg in the TIPS group (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.03,6.61) versus 9.87 (2.99) mg in the FNB group (95% CI 8.91,10.83). Ambulation distances and active postoperative knee extension in the TIPS group showed greater significance than in the FNB group (TIPS: 18.0 [7.37] m, 95% CI 15.64,20.35] vs. FNB: 8.95 [5.93] m, 95% CI 7.05,10.84) and (TIPS: 52.12 [16.39], 95% CI 46.88,57.33 vs. FNB: 26.05 [11.10], 95% CI 22.501,29.59). Nausea was more evident in FNB patients. Conclusion TIPS block provides superior analgesia than FNB with motor sparing of the quadriceps after TKA.
Collapse
|
3
|
Eid GM, El said Shaban S, Mostafa TA. Comparison of ultrasound-guided genicular nerve block and knee periarticular infiltration for postoperative pain and functional outcomes in knee arthroplasty - A randomised trial. Indian J Anaesth 2023; 67:885-892. [PMID: 38044925 PMCID: PMC10691610 DOI: 10.4103/ija.ija_449_23] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2023] [Revised: 08/13/2023] [Accepted: 08/17/2023] [Indexed: 12/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and Aims Optimal analgesia after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) enhances patients' and surgical outcomes. The study investigated the ultrasound-guided genicular nerve block versus the periarticular infiltration in TKA. Methods Eighty-eight patients aged above 50 years scheduled for unilateral TKA were randomised as: Group 1 received intraoperative periarticular infiltration (0.5 mL adrenaline [4.5 µg/mL], 20 mL bupivacaine 0.5% with 89.5 mL saline) and Group 2 received immediate postoperative genicular nerve block (15 mL bupivacaine 0.25% with 2.5 g/mL adrenaline). The postoperative morphine consumption was during the first two postoperative days the primary outcome. The secondary outcomes were time to rescue analgesia, pain scores and functional outcomes. The comparison between groups was performed using the Chi-square test, the Student's t-test and the Mann-Whitney U test, as appropriate. Results The postoperative morphine consumption during the first two postoperative days and pain scores at rest at 12 h postoperatively were less in Group 1 than in Group 2 (P < 0.001). Pain scores during movement on the first postoperative day were lower in the periarticular group than the genicular group at 6, 12 and 24 h (P < 0.001). At 18 h, pain scores were higher in the periarticular group than in the genicular group at rest and movement (P < 0.001). Quadriceps motor strength scores were comparable between groups (P > 0.05). The knee range of motion and time up and go test during both days showed a statistically significant difference in the periarticular group compared to the genicular group (P < 0.05). Conclusion Periarticular infiltration and genicular nerve block yield effective postoperative analgesia and functional outcomes after TKA without motor affection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gehan M. Eid
- Department of Anesthesiology and Surgical Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt
| | - Shiamaa El said Shaban
- Department of Anesthesiology and Surgical Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt
| | - Tarek A. Mostafa
- Department of Anesthesiology and Surgical Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Qiao Y, Li F, Zhang L, Song X, Yu X, Yang W, Zhou S, Zhang H. Clinical effects of interspace between the popliteal artery and capsule of the posterior knee block with multimodal analgesia for total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2023; 143:5815-5832. [PMID: 36790543 PMCID: PMC10449984 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-023-04798-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2022] [Accepted: 01/22/2023] [Indexed: 02/16/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Combination of regional anaesthesia technique that is most effective in analgesia and postoperative functional outcome with the fewest complications needs investigation. Interspace between the popliteal artery and the capsule of the posterior knee block (IPACK) has been introduced clinically. We evaluated the efficacy of IPACK in combination with other nerve blocks after total knee arthroplasty. METHODS Data were obtained from PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Sciencedirect. Studies that compared outcomes using IPACK combined with other regional nerve blocks after total knee arthroplasty with other analgesic modalities and those which used pain scores or opioid consumption as primary or secondary outcomes were included. RESULTS Seventeen articles (20 trials, 1652 patients) were included. IPACK supplementation significantly reduced rest pain scores after total knee arthroplasty at postoperative hours 8-12(95%CI - 0.85 [- 1.36, - 0.34], I2 = 94%, p = 0.001), postoperative day 1 (95% CI - 0.49 [- 0.85, - 0.14], I2 = 87%, p = 0.006), and postoperative day 2 (95% CI - 0.28 [- 0.51, -0.05], I2 = 72%, p = 0.02); there was no significant difference at postoperative day 3 or discharge (95% CI - 0.14 [- 0.33, 0.05], I2 = 0%, p = 0.14). Combination treatment resulted in reduced dynamic pain scores at postoperative hours 8-12 (95%CI - 0.52 [- 0.92, - 0.12], I2 = 86%, p = 0.01) and postoperative day 1(95% CI - 0.49 [- 0.87, - 0.11], I2 = 88%, p = 0.01). There was no difference between postoperative day 2(95% CI - 0.29 [- 0.63, 0.05], I2 = 80%, p = 0.09), postoperative day 3 or discharge (95% CI - 0.45 [- 0.92, 0.02], I2 = 83%, p = 0.06). In addition, it strongly reduced postoperative opioid consumption within 24 H (95% CI - 0.76 [- 1.13, - 0.39], I2 = 85%, p < 0.00001), 24-48 H (95% CI - 0.43 [- 0.85, - 0.01], I2 = 83%, p = 0.04), and total opioid use (95% CI - 0.64 [- 1.07, - 0.22], I2 = 86%, p = 0.003). Although IPACK supplementation improved timed up and go test and walking distance at postoperative day 2, there was no statistically significant difference at other time periods or obvious improvement in knee range of motion and quadriceps strength. IPACK block supplementation could shorten the length of stay (LOS) (95% CI - 0.40 [- 0.64, - 0.15], I2 = 70%, p = 0.001) and improve patient satisfaction (95% CI 0.43 [0.01, 0.84], I2 = 87%, p = 0.04). CONCLUSION Based on these results, IPACK supplementation, in addition to standard postoperative analgesia, can be used effectively and safely to relieve early postoperative pain after total knee arthroplasty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yongjie Qiao
- Department of Joint Surgery, The 940th Hospital of Joint Logistic Support Force of Chinese People's Liberation Army, No. 333, Nanbinghe Road, Qilihe District, Lanzhou, 730050, Gansu, China
| | - Feng Li
- Department of Joint Surgery, The 940th Hospital of Joint Logistic Support Force of Chinese People's Liberation Army, No. 333, Nanbinghe Road, Qilihe District, Lanzhou, 730050, Gansu, China
- Department of Orthopedics, The 943rd Hospital of Joint Logistic Support Force of Chinese People's Liberation Army, Wuwei, Gansu, China
| | - Lvdan Zhang
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, The 940th Hospital of Joint Logistic Support Force of Chinese People's Liberation Army, Lanzhou, Gansu, China
| | - Xiaoyang Song
- Department of Joint Surgery, The 940th Hospital of Joint Logistic Support Force of Chinese People's Liberation Army, No. 333, Nanbinghe Road, Qilihe District, Lanzhou, 730050, Gansu, China
| | - Xinyuan Yu
- Department of Joint Surgery, The 940th Hospital of Joint Logistic Support Force of Chinese People's Liberation Army, No. 333, Nanbinghe Road, Qilihe District, Lanzhou, 730050, Gansu, China
| | - Wenbin Yang
- Department of Joint Surgery, The 940th Hospital of Joint Logistic Support Force of Chinese People's Liberation Army, No. 333, Nanbinghe Road, Qilihe District, Lanzhou, 730050, Gansu, China
| | - Shenghu Zhou
- Department of Joint Surgery, The 940th Hospital of Joint Logistic Support Force of Chinese People's Liberation Army, No. 333, Nanbinghe Road, Qilihe District, Lanzhou, 730050, Gansu, China
| | - Haoqiang Zhang
- Department of Joint Surgery, The 940th Hospital of Joint Logistic Support Force of Chinese People's Liberation Army, No. 333, Nanbinghe Road, Qilihe District, Lanzhou, 730050, Gansu, China.
| |
Collapse
|