Dilemmas and Challenges in Treating Seronegative Autoimmune Encephalitis in Indian Children

Clinical features and outcomes in children with seronegative autoimmune encephalitis

AIM

To characterize the presenting features and outcomes in children with seronegative autoimmune encephalitis, and to evaluate whether scores at nadir for the Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) and Clinical Assessment Scale for Autoimmune Encephalitis (CASE) or its paediatric-specific modification (ped-CASE) are predictive of outcomes.

METHOD

This observational study included children younger than 18 years of age with seronegative autoimmune encephalitis. Demographics and clinical data were collected. The mRS and CASE/ped-CASE scores were used to evaluate disease severity. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression were used for data analysis and to evaluate associations between scale scores and outcomes.

RESULTS

Sixty-three children were included (39 [62%] females, median age 7 years, interquartile range [IQR] 4 years 1 months-11 years 6 months), with follow-up available for 56 out of 63 patients (median follow-up 12.2 months, IQR 13.4-17.8). The most frequent presenting neurological manifestation was encephalopathy (81%). Median CASE/ped-CASE and mRS scores at nadir were 12.0 (IQR 7.0-17.0) and 1.0 (IQR 0-2.0) respectively. Thirty-three patients (59%) had persistent neurological deficits at follow-up. Both scoring systems suggested good functional recovery (mRS score ≤2, 95%; CASE/ped-CASE score <5, 91%). CASE/ped-CASE score was more likely than mRS to distinguish children with worse outcomes.

INTERPRETATION

Children with seronegative autoimmune encephalitis are likely to have neurological deficits at follow-up. CASE/ped-CASE is more likely to distinguish children with worse outcomes than MRS.

Diagnostic criteria for autoimmune encephalitis: utility and pitfalls for antibody-negative disease

Increased awareness of autoimmune encephalitis has led to two unintended consequences: a high frequency of misdiagnoses and the inappropriate use of diagnostic criteria for antibody-negative disease. Misdiagnoses typically occur for three reasons: first, non-adherence to reported clinical requirements for considering a disorder as possible autoimmune encephalitis; second, inadequate assessment of inflammatory changes in brain MRI and CSF; and third, absent or limited use of brain tissue assays along with use of cell-based assays that include only a narrow range of antigens. For diagnosis of possible autoimmune encephalitis and probable antibody-negative autoimmune encephalitis, clinicians should adhere to published criteria for adults and children, focusing particularly on exclusion of alternative disorders. Moreover, for diagnosis of probable antibody-negative autoimmune encephalitis, the absence of neural antibodies in CSF and serum should be well substantiated. Neural antibody testing should use tissue assays along with cell-based assays that include a broad range of antigens. Live neuronal studies in specialised centres can assist in resolving inconsistencies with respect to syndrome-antibody associations. Accurate diagnosis of probable antibody-negative autoimmune encephalitis will identify patients with similar syndromes and biomarkers, which will provide homogeneous populations for future assessments of treatment response and outcome.

Diagnosis and Management of Suspected Pediatric Autoimmune Encephalitis: A Comprehensive, Multidisciplinary Approach and Review of Literature

Autoimmune encephalitis is an increasingly recognized entity in children. When treated promptly, favorable outcomes are seen in a majority of pediatric patients. However, recognition of autoimmune encephalitis in young patients is challenging. Once autoimmune encephalitis is suspected, additional difficulties exist regarding timing of treatment initiation and duration of treatment, as evidence to guide management of these patients is emerging. Here, we review available literature regarding pediatric autoimmune encephalitis and present our institution's comprehensive approach to the evaluation and management of the disease. These guidelines were developed through an iterative process involving both pediatric neurologists and rheumatologists.

Clinical Features, Treatment Strategies, and Outcomes in Hospitalized Children With Immune-Mediated Encephalopathies

BACKGROUND

Autoimmune encephalitis (AE) and acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM) are immune-mediated brain conditions that can cause substantial neurological sequalae. Data describing the clinical characteristics, treatments, and neurological outcomes for these conditions are needed.

METHODS

This is a single-center retrospective review of children diagnosed with AE or ADEM over a nine-year period with discharge outcomes measured by the Modified Rankin Score.

RESULTS

Seventy-five patients (23 with ADEM and 52 with AE) were identified. Patients with ADEM had a higher percentage of abnormal magnetic resonance imaging findings (100% vs 60.8%; P < 0.001) and a shorter time from symptom onset to diagnosis (6 vs 14 days; P = 0.024). Oligoclonal bands and serum and cerebrospinal fluid inflammatory indices were higher in patients with AE. Nearly all patients received corticosteroids followed by plasmapheresis or intravenous immunoglobulin, and treatment strategies did not differ significantly between groups. Second-line immune therapies were commonly used in patients with AE. Finally, patients with AE had trends toward longer hospital lengths of stay (21 vs 13 days) and a higher percentage of neurological disability at hospital discharge (59.6% vs 34.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

Although patients with ADEM and AE may have similar presenting symptoms, we found significant differences in the frequency of imaging findings, symptom duration, and laboratory and cerebrospinal fluid profiles, which can assist in distinguishing between the diagnoses. Patients in both groups were treated with a combination of immunomodulating therapies, and neurological disability was common at hospital discharge.

Antibody Negative Autoimmune Encephalitis- Does it Differ from Definite One?

Context

Autoimmune encephalitis (AE) is an emerging cause of non-infective encephalitis, presentations of which vary widely. Traditionally the diagnosis of AE is based on detection of antibodies in a patient with clinical picture suggestive of AE.

Aim

To evaluate the clinical characteristics and response to immunotherapy in patients with antibody negative autoimmune encephalitis and to compare them with definite cases.

Settings and Design

A prospective follow-up study was done in patients presenting with presumptive symptoms of AE from January 2017 to January 2019. The study was done in a tertiary care institute of Northern India.

Patients and Methods

Demographic and clinical parameters were noted and relevant investigations for management were done according to well-defined protocol. The patients were treated with immunomodulatory therapy in the form of steroids and/or intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg). They were followed up for treatment response and relapse at 2 monthly intervals.

Statistical Analysis Used

The data was expressed as either proportions or mean/median. Chi-square test/Independent T test was used to compare antibody positive and antibody negative group.

Results

Out of 31 patients with presumptive AE, 16 patients tested positive for autoimmune antibodies (definite AE). Incidences of seizure, behavioral abnormalities, dementia and altered sensorium were similar between the 2 groups (p > 0.05). Complete or partial response was seen in all treated patients in both groups with no significant difference (p 0.716). CSF protein concentration and cellularity were higher in the definite group although only high protein concentration could reach statistical significance (p 0.002). Malignancy could be confirmed after extensive search in 2 out of 16 patients with definite AE and in 1 out of 15 antibody negative AE patients.

Conclusions

Clinical presentation of antibody negative cases does not differ significantly from definite ones. Since treatment response is also similar in both the groups, starting immunotherapy in a patient presenting with presumptive symptoms of AE, while ruling out other common mimickers, seems to be the need of the hour in the management of this evolving entity.