A comparison of cardiopulmonary resuscitation with standard manual compressions versus compressions with real-time audiovisual feedback: A randomized controlled pilot study

Chest compression quality and patient outcomes with the use of a CPR feedback device: A retrospective study

Feedback devices were developed to guide resuscitations as targets recommended by various guidelines are difficult to achieve. Yet, there is limited evidence to support their use for in-hospital cardiac arrests (IHCA), and they did not correlate with patient outcomes. Therefore, this study has investigated the compression quality and patient outcomes in IHCA with the use of a feedback device via a retrospective study of inpatient code blue activations in a Singapore hospital over one year. The primary outcome was compression quality and secondary outcomes were survival, downtime and neurological status. 64 of 110 (58.2%) cases were included. Most resuscitations (71.9%) met the recommended chest compression fraction (CCF, defined as the proportion of time spent on compressions during resuscitation) despite overall quality being suboptimal. Greater survival to discharge and better neurological status in resuscitated patients respectively correlated with higher median CCF (p = 0.040 and 0.026 respectively) and shorter downtime (p < 0.001 and 0.001 respectively); independently, a higher CCF correlated with a shorter downtime (p = 0.014). Overall, this study demonstrated that reducing interruptions is crucial for good outcomes in IHCA. However, compression quality remained suboptimal despite feedback device implementation, possibly requiring further simulation training and coaching. Future multicentre studies incorporating these measures should be explored.

Do cardiopulmonary resuscitation real-time audiovisual feedback devices improve patient outcomes? A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Cardiac arrest is a leading cause of mortality in America and has increased in the incidence of cases over the last several years. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) increases survival outcomes in cases of cardiac arrest; however, healthcare workers often do not perform CPR within recommended guidelines. Real-time audiovisual feedback (RTAVF) devices improve the quality of CPR performed. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to compare the effect of RTAVF-assisted CPR with conventional CPR and to evaluate whether the use of these devices improved outcomes in both in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients.

AIM

To identify the effect of RTAVF-assisted CPR on patient outcomes and CPR quality with in- and OHCA.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, SCOPUS, the Cochrane Library, and EMBASE from inception to July 27, 2020, for studies comparing patient outcomes and/or CPR quality metrics between RTAVF-assisted CPR and conventional CPR in cases of IHCA or OHCA. The primary outcomes of interest were return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and survival to hospital discharge (SHD), with secondary outcomes of chest compression rate and chest compression depth. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale and Cochrane Collaboration's "risk of bias" tool. Data was analyzed using R statistical software 4.2.0. results were statistically significant if P < 0.05.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies (n = 17600) were included. Patients were on average 69 ± 17.5 years old, with 7022 (39.8%) female patients. Overall pooled ROSC in patients in this study was 37% (95% confidence interval = 23%-54%). RTAVF-assisted CPR significantly improved ROSC, both overall [risk ratio (RR) 1.17 (1.001-1.362); P = 0.048] and in cases of IHCA [RR 1.36 (1.06-1.80); P = 0.002]. There was no significant improvement in ROSC for OHCA (RR 1.04; 0.91-1.19; P = 0.47). No significant effect was seen in SHD [RR 1.04 (0.91-1.19); P = 0.47] or chest compression rate [standardized mean difference (SMD) -2.1; (-4.6-0.5)]; P = 0.09]. A significant improvement was seen in chest compression depth [SMD 1.6; (0.02-3.1); P = 0.047].

CONCLUSION

RTAVF-assisted CPR increases ROSC in cases of IHCA and chest compression depth but has no significant effect on ROSC in cases of OHCA, SHD, or chest compression rate.

Effect of real-time feedback on patient's outcomes and survival after cardiac arrest: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

This study investigated the effect of real-time feedback on the restoration of spontaneous circulation, survival to hospital discharge, and favorable functional outcomes after hospital discharge.

METHODS

PubMed, ScienceDirect, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases were searched to screen the relevant studies up to June 2020. Fixed-effects or random-effects model were used to calculate the pooled estimates of relative ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

Ten relevant articles on 4281 cardiac arrest cases were identified. The pooled analyses indicated that real-time feedback did not improve restoration of spontaneous circulation (RR: 1.13, 95% CI: 0.92-1.37, and P = .24; I2 = 81%; P < .001), survival to hospital discharge (RR: 1.27, 95% CI: 0.90-1.79, and P = .18; I2 = 74%; P < .001), and favorable neurological outcomes after hospital discharge (RR: 1.09, 95% CI: 0.87-1.38; P = .45; I2 = 16%; P = .31). The predefined subgroup analysis showed that the sample size and arrest location may be the origin of heterogeneity. Begg's and Egger's tests showed no publication bias, and sensitivity analysis indicated that the results were stable.

CONCLUSION

The meta-analysis had shown that the implementation of real-time audiovisual feedback was not associated with improved restoration of spontaneous circulation, increased survival, and favorable functional outcomes after hospital discharge.

Survival to intensive care unit discharge among in-hospital cardiac arrest patients by applying audiovisual feedback device

Aims

Survival rates after in‐hospital cardiac arrest remain very low. Although there is evidence that the use of audiovisual feedback devices can improve compression components, there are no data on patient survival. Therefore, we conducted this study to analyse the survival rate of patients with in‐hospital cardiac arrest after discharge from the intensive care unit.

Methods and results

This study was a secondary analysis of a prospective, randomized, controlled, parallel study of patients who received either standard manual chest compression or a real‐time feedback device. Parametric and semi‐parametric models were fitted to the data. Different survival time of length of stay was investigated by univariate and multiple analyses. Pearson's correlation between length of stay and hospital length of stay was obtained. A total of 900 patients with a mean survival time of 35 days were included. Intervention was associated with a higher length of stay. Relative time was significant in adjusted fitted log‐normal regression for intervention group, female gender, and cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the night shift. A positive correlation between length of stay and hospital length of stay was found.

Conclusions

Implementation of feedback device improved survival and length of stay. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation performance during the night shift decreased the survival time, which could be due to the inexperienced staff available outside working hours.

Do automated real-time feedback devices improve CPR quality? A systematic review of literature

Aim

Automated real-time feedback devices have been considered a potential tool to improve the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Despite previous studies supporting the usefulness of such devices during training, others have conflicting conclusions regarding its efficacy during real-life CPR. This systematic review aimed to assess the effectiveness of automated real-time feedback devices for improving CPR performance during training, simulation and real-life resuscitation attempts in the adult and paediatric population.

Methods

Articles published between January 2010 and November 2020 were searched from BVS, Cinahl, Cochrane, PubMed and Web of Science, and reviewed according to a pre-defined set of eligibility criteria which included healthcare providers and randomised controlled trial studies. CPR quality was assessed based on guideline compliance for chest compression rate, chest compression depth and residual leaning.

Results

The selection strategy led to 19 eligible studies, 16 in training/simulation and three in real-life CPR. Feedback devices during training and/or simulation resulted in improved acquisition of skills and enhanced performance in 15 studies. One study resulted in no significant improvement. During real resuscitation attempts, three studies demonstrated significant improvement with the use of feedback devices in comparison with standard CPR (without feedback device).

Conclusion

The use of automated real-time feedback devices enhances skill acquisition and CPR performance during training of healthcare professionals. Further research is needed to better understand the role of feedback devices in clinical setting.

Real-time audio-visual feedback with handheld nonautomated external defibrillator devices during cardiopulmonary resuscitation for in-hospital cardiac arrest: A meta-analysis

Objective:

Restoring cardiopulmonary circulation with effective chest compression remains the cornerstone of resuscitation, yet real-time compressions may be suboptimal. This project aims to determine whether in patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA; population), chest compressions performed with free-standing audiovisual feedback (AVF) device as compared to standard manual chest compression (comparison) results in improved outcomes, including the sustained return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), and survival to the intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital discharge (outcomes).

Methods:

Scholarly databases and relevant bibliographies were searched, as were clinical trial registries and relevant conference proceedings to limit publication bias. Studies were not limited by date, language, or publication status. Clinical randomized controlled trials (RCT) were included that enrolled adults (age ≥ 18 years) with IHCA and assessed real-time chest compressions delivered with either the standard manual technique or with AVF from a freestanding device not linked to an automated external defibrillator (AED) or automated compressor.

Results:

Four clinical trials met inclusion criteria and were included. No ongoing trials were identified. One RCT assessed the Ambu CardioPump (Ambu Inc., Columbia, MD, USA), whereas three assessed Cardio First Angel™ (Inotech, Nubberg, Germany). No clinical RCTs compared AVF devices head-to-head. Three RCTs were multi-center. Sustained ROSC (4 studies, n = 1064) was improved with AVF use (Relative risk [RR] 1.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.39–2.04), as was survival to hospital discharge (2 studies, n = 922; RR 1.78, 95% CI 1.54–2.06) and survival to hospital discharge (3 studies, n = 984; RR 1.91, 95% CI 1.62–2.25).

Conclusion:

The moderate-quality evidence suggests that chest compressions performed using a non-AED free-standing AVF device during resuscitation for IHCA improves sustained ROSC and survival to ICU and hospital discharge.

Trial Registration:

PROSPERO (CRD42020157536).