Mucormycosis: The Scathing Invader

Post COVID-19 mucormycosis in critical care settings: A prospective cohort study in a tertiary care center in Egypt

BACKGROUND

The emergence of mucormycosis as a life-threatening fungal infection after the coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) is a major concern and challenge, but there is limited information on the risk factors for mortality in patients.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective cohort study from May 2021 to April 2022 to determine the in-hospital outcomes of post-COVID-19 mucormycosis during the intensive care unit (ICU) stay. The sample of the study was collected as consecutive sampling using all accessible patients in the study period. The Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS), version 25 (IBM, Chicago, Illinois, USA) was used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Among 150 patients with post-COVID-19 mucormycosis, the majority had a primary sinus infection (86.0 %), while 11.3 % had both sinus and ocular infections, and 2.7 % had sinus and cutaneous infections. Around 21 % (n = 31) of patients deceased after staying in the ICU for a median (range) of 45.0 (10.0-145.0) days. The majority of the patients who deceased had pneumonia patches on computed tomography (CT) (90.3 %) while none of the patients who were discharged had pneumonia patches (p < 0.001). The deceased group had higher rates of pulmonary embolism (93.5 %) compared to the surviving groups (21.8 %). In a multivariate Cox regression analysis, the risk of death was higher in older patients above 60 years old (hazard ratio (95 %CI): 6.7 (1.73-15.81)), increase among patient with history of steroid administration (hazard ratio (95 %CI): 5.70 (1.23-10.91)), who had facial cutaneous infection with mucormycosis (hazard ratio (95 %CI): 8.76 (1.78-25.18)), patients with uncontrolled diabetes (hazard ratio (95 %CI): 10.76 (1.78, 65.18)), and total leukocytic count (TLC>10 ×103 mcL) (hazard ratio (95 %CI): 10.03 (3.29-30.61)).

CONCLUSIONS

Identifying high-risk patients especially old diabetic patients with corticosteroid administration and detecting their deterioration quickly is crucial in reducing post-COVID-19 mucormycosis mortality rates, and these factors must be considered when developing treatment and quarantine strategies.

Acute Kidney Injury Following Posaconazole for Mucormycosis: SARS-CoV-2 as a Back-Seat Driver

Viruses have been implicated in the causation of several systemic illnesses, either directly or by immune modulation. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is not an exception. Due to altered immune regulation, it is often associated with novel clinical manifestations and complications which have not been reported before. SARS-CoV-2 induces a pro-inflammatory state which makes the patient vulnerable to developing a variety of previously unreported adverse reactions to medications. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and its treatment have provided a fertile ground for various opportunistic infections including mucormycosis. The standard treatment for mucormycosis is surgical debridement and liposomal amphotericin B. Triazole antifungals such as posaconazole and isavuconazonium are the second-line agents for those intolerant to first-line therapy. Posaconazole is safer than amphotericin B as far as renal adverse effects are concerned.

We report the case of a 60-year-old lady with type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension, ischemic heart disease, and osteoarthritis. She had severe COVID-19 requiring non-invasive ventilation four months ago. She presented with right rhino-orbital swelling, diplopia, and serosanguinous discharge from the right nostril. She had right third, sixth, and seventh cranial nerve palsies. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed right maxillary, ethmoid, and frontal sinusitis. Biopsy from the right nostril confirmed mucormycosis. Having normal renal and liver functions, she was started on oral posaconazole as she had an allergic reaction to a test dose of 1 mg amphotericin B (non-liposomal) in 20 mL of 5% dextrose water infused over 30 minutes. On day five, she developed acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy. Her posaconazole was stopped. As she was not improving with conservative treatment, an ultrasound-guided, percutaneous renal biopsy was performed from the left kidney. The renal biopsy revealed thrombotic microangiopathy. She was started on liposomal amphotericin B as decided by the multidisciplinary team. Her renal function improved, and she continued on liposomal amphotericin B.

We conclude that thrombotic microangiopathy, in this case, was likely due to posaconazole. This is a novel adverse effect presumably of posaconazole. This case report will alert physicians to be vigilant of the renal adverse effects of posaconazole in patients who have had COVID-19. Patients who develop renal injury while on posaconazole should undergo an early renal biopsy to ascertain the exact histopathology.

Current Treatment Options for COVID-19 Associated Mucormycosis: Present Status and Future Perspectives

Mucormycosis has become increasingly associated with COVID-19, leading to the use of the term “COVID-19 associated mucormycosis (CAM)”. Treatment of CAM is challenging due to factors such as resistance to many antifungals and underlying co-morbidities. India is particularly at risk for this disease due to the large number of patients with COVID-19 carrying comorbidities that predispose them to the development of mucormycosis. Additionally, mucormycosis treatment is complicated due to the atypical symptoms and delayed presentation after the resolution of COVID-19. Since this disease is associated with increased morbidity and mortality, early identification and diagnosis are desirable to initiate a suitable combination of therapies and control the disease. At present, the first-line treatment involves Amphotericin B and surgical debridement. To overcome limitations associated with surgery (invasive, multiple procedures required) and amphotericin B (toxicity, extended duration and limited clinical success), additional therapies can be utilized as adjuncts or alternatives to reduce treatment duration and improve prognosis. This review discusses the challenges associated with treating CAM and the critical aspects for controlling this invasive fungal infection—early diagnosis and initiation of therapy, reversal of risk factors, and adoption of a multipronged treatment strategy. It also details the various therapeutic options (in vitro, in vivo and human case reports) that have been used for the treatment of CAM.