Comparison of the Efficacy of Three Different Methods of Explaining the Surgical Procedure of Hemithyroidectomy

What makes women receptive to breast self-examination, animation, or simulation? - a comparative study

Background

Breast self-examination (BSE) plays an important role in the early diagnosis of breast cancer in India owing to the stigma attached to cancer. The authors compared the efficacies of animation video versus simulation techniques in BSE.

Methods

Women with no previous history of conditions affecting the breasts were included in this prospective observational study and divided into an animation or simulation arm. The latter was further divided into three subgroups as per the simulation models used : the German (Delta Healthcare), British (Health Edco), and Indian (low-cost, validated) models used for teaching BSE. The hybrid animation video had a 9 min runtime with a lecture on BSE and a virtual character performing BSE. In both the arms, participants filled in a validated modified patient satisfaction questionnaire.

Results

A total of 500 women participated. The mean age of the participants in the animation video arm was 20.21±3.88 years and 19.34±2.27, 22.94±9.6, and 18.97±1.31(20.41±5.99) years in the Indian, German, and British simulation models arm, respectively. The age difference between the two arms was statistically significant (P<0.05). Both animation video and simulation models were found to be useful by the participants. The participants' response to animation video being a better organized tool for learning BSE was statistically significant (90.48±7.98 vs. 84.02±15.09 P≤0.001) when compared to simulation models. The younger women (≤20 years) found these tools significantly more useful than those aged >20 years.

Conclusions

All models had good efficiency and utility as learning tools for BSE. However, large studies in BSE set up with combination models are needed.

Using Animated Videos to Increase Patient Knowledge: A Meta-Analytic Review

This article meta-analyzed 21 studies that tested the effectiveness of animated videos in improving learning in clinical and nonclinical settings compared with standard education. Animation was defined as the use of moving objects that are typically drawn or simulated. Videos ranged from just over 2 min in duration to 16 min in duration in articles published from 2009 through 2020. Mayer's Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning provided the theoretical model to frame the current analyses. Findings indicated an overall positive effect (d = 0.35) for use of animation in improving viewers' learning across a variety of health and clinical contexts, including surgery and diabetes. Moderator analyses indicated learning effects were greater in patient samples and samples with a higher proportion of male participants. Study findings were discussed in terms of the theoretical and practical implications for health communication scholars and practitioners.

Validation of cost-effective model for breast self-examination

The incidence of breast cancer is increasing in India; it predominantly affects women in their 30s and 40s. The disease burden is very high given the high incidence of triple-negative disease in a large portion of the population. Early detection can save lives and aid in breast conservation surgery. Breast self-examination (BSE) is a valid tool for early breast cancer detection. If performed with the help of a simulation model that resembles a given culture and tradition, it can result in good outcomes from screening programs. We designed and validated an Indian model for BSE and reported the feasibility of this model.

Materials and methods

We designed an Indian model for the BSE based on the cultural mindset of Indian women. The design was finalized, and the model was constructed. It was then compared with preexisting international models and validated by in-depth interviews with validation experts from various fields involved in breast cancer management. Minor design revisions were made, followed by testing and re-testing. Finally, it was ready for public use.

Results

The in-depth interview was conducted using a validated modified animation multimedia questionnaire. The majority of the validation experts had used stimulation models before, and all stated that it could help teach women about BSE, and it was comparable with other preexisting internationally validated models (91.33±4.98%).

Conclusion

Using a breast model, women can learn to detect breast cancer as early as possible, and this can lead to good outcomes. We designed the model using easily available, cheap, and safe materials to keep it as realistic and useful as possible. The Indian BSE model can be used by Indian women to learn to detect breast lumps early. It is easily reproducible and cost-effective.

Digital technology in informed consent for surgery: systematic review

BACKGROUND

Informed consent is an ethical and legal requirement in healthcare and supports patient autonomy to make informed choices about their own care. This review explores the impact of digital technology for informed consent in surgery.

METHODS

A systematic search of EBSCOhost (MEDLINE/CINAHL), Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Web of Science was performed in November 2021. All RCTs comparing outcomes of both digital and non-digital (standard) consent in surgery were included. Each included study underwent an evaluation of methodological quality using the Cochrane risk of bias (2.0) tool. Outcomes assessed included comprehension, level of satisfaction and anxiety, and feasibility of digital interventions in practice.

RESULTS

A total of 40 studies, across 13 countries and 15 surgical specialties were included in this analysis. Digital consent interventions used active patient participation and passive patient participation in 15 and 25 studies respectively. Digital consent had a positive effect on early comprehension in 21 of 30 (70 per cent) studies and delayed comprehension in 9 of 20 (45 per cent) studies. Only 16 of 38 (42 per cent) studies assessed all four elements of informed consent: general information, risks, benefits, and alternatives. Most studies showed no difference in satisfaction or anxiety. A minority of studies reported on feasibility of digital technology in practice.

CONCLUSION

Digital technologies in informed consent for surgery were found to have a positive effect on early comprehension, without any negative effect on satisfaction or anxiety. It is recommended that future studies explore the feasibility of these applications for vulnerable patient groups and busy surgical practice.

The effectiveness of video animations as information tools for patients and the general public: A systematic review

Background and objectives

Video animations are used increasingly as patient information tools; however, we do not know their value compared to other formats of delivery, such as printed materials, verbal consultations or static images.

Methods

This review compares the effectiveness of video animations as information tools vs. other formats of delivery on patient knowledge, attitudes and cognitions, and behaviours. Included studies had the following features: controlled design with random or quasi-random allocation; patients being informed about any health condition or members of the public being informed about a public health topic; comparing video animation with another delivery format. Multiple digital databases were searched from 1996-June 2021. We also undertook citation searching. We used dual, independent decision-making for inclusion assessment, data extraction and quality appraisal. Included studies were appraised using the Cochrane ROB2 tool. Findings were reported using narrative synthesis.

Results

We included 38 trials, focussed on: explaining medical or surgical procedures (n = 17); management of long-term conditions (n = 11); public health, health-promotion or illness-prevention (n = 10). Studies evaluated cartoon animations (n = 29), 3D animations (n = 6), or 2D animations, "white-board" animations or avatars (n = 1 each). Knowledge was assessed in 30 studies, showing greater knowledge from animations in 19 studies, compared to a range of comparators. Attitudes and cognitions were assessed in 21 studies, and animations resulted in positive outcomes in six studies, null effects in 14 studies, and less positive outcomes than standard care in one study. Patient behaviours were assessed in nine studies, with animations resulting in positive outcomes in four and null effects in the remainder. Overall risk of bias was "high" (n = 18), "some concerns" (n = 16) or "low" (n = 4). Common reasons for increased risk of bias were randomisation processes, small sample size or lack of sample size calculation, missing outcome data, and lack of protocol publication.

Discussion

The overall evidence base is highly variable, with mostly small trials. Video animations show promise as patient information tools, particularly for effects on knowledge, but further evaluation is needed in higher quality studies.

Systematic Review Registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?, identifier: CRD42021236296.