Evaluation of Changes in Insulin Sensitivity in Prepubertal Small for Gestational Age Children Treated with Growth Hormone

Growth Hormone Therapy for Small for Gestational Age Short Stature Develops Type 2 Diabetes

Growth Hormone therapy has been shown to induce transient insulin resistance in children, and there is concern regarding the diabetogenic potential of GH therapy in children born small for gestational age (SGA). In this case, female patient born SGA with a weight of 2,750 g (-1.73 standard deviation (SD)) and length of 45.5 cm (-2.6 SD). The patient's father and paternal grandfather were diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus. At 3 years of age, the patient presented with short stature; height and weight were 85 cm (-2.5 SD) and 13 kg (-0.19 SD), respectively. She was placed on GH therapy. At 11 years of age, her fasting blood glucose and hemoglobin A1c levels were 116 mg/dL and 7.4%, respectively. Blood test results were negative for anti-glutamic acid decarboxylase and anti-islet antigen-2 antibodies. The patient discontinued GH therapy and started diet therapy and oral metformin (500 mg/day) administration. Five months later, the hemoglobin A1c level was 5.3% and glycemic control further improved. To our knowledge, family history may be an important risk factor for GH-induced diabetes. So, the GH dosage for patients born SGA with family history of diabetes should be adjusted so as not to be too excessive, and long-term follow-up studies will be required to evaluate fully the effects of GH therapy for them.

Non-Obese Type 2 Diabetes with a History of Being an Extremely Preterm Small-for-Gestational-Age Infant without Early Adiposity Rebound

Adiposity rebound (AR), which is defined as a situation in which the body mass index (BMI) starts to increase after infancy, is a predictive marker of future development of type 2 diabetes. The patient was a 20-year-old male. He was born at 28 gestational weeks with a birthweight of 642 g (−3.20 standard deviation, small-for-gestational age [SGA]). AR during early childhood or obesity in later childhood was not observed. At the onset of type 2 diabetes (20 years of age), his BMI, body fat percentage, and body fat mass were within normal ranges (20.4, 18.4% and 10.8 kg, respectively). However, his muscle mass was 44.7 kg, with low muscle mass of the trunk and upper limbs, which was lower than the standard reference, indicating that myogenic insulin resistance was involved in the development of non-obese type 2 diabetes. This case report describes a patient with no presentation of AR and obesity during childhood, who was born extremely preterm SGA, developed non-obese type 2 diabetes with low muscle mass. We suggest that patients born extremely preterm SGA should be carefully observed for the development of type 2 diabetes, even if they did not have AR in early childhood or had not become obese.

Growth hormone treatment does not to lead to insulin resistance nor excessive rise in IGF-1 levels, while improving height in patients small for gestational age A long-term observational study

OBJECTIVE

In children born small for gestational age (SGA), the relationship between growth hormone (GH) treatment and insulin resistance (IR) has only been investigated for a short period, necessitating a longer observation period. This study aimed to evaluate the long-term (10 years) effect of GH to SGA-children on IR and safety during treatment.

DESIGN

This was a multicenter observational study.

PATIENTS

SGA-children who received GH treatment in Spain (stratified by Tanner-stage and age at GH onset [two groups: ≤6 years old or >6 years old]).

MEASUREMENTS

The analysed variables (yearly measures) included auxologic, metabolic (insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), height velocity [HV], weight and homeostatic model assessment-IR [HOMA-IR]) and safety data. Data were collected prospectively (since the study approval: 2007) and retrospectively (since the initiation of GH treatment: 2005-2007).

RESULTS

A total of 389 SGA children (369 Tanner-I) were recruited from 27 centres. The mean age (standard deviation) of the children at GH treatment onset was 7.2 (2.8) years old. IGF-1 (standard deviation score [SDS]) and HOMA-IR values tended to increase until the sixth year of GH-treatment, with significant differences being observed only during the first year, while these remained stable in the later years (within normal ranges). Height (SDS) increased significantly (basal: -3.0; tenth year: -1.13), and the maximum HV (SDS) occurred during the first year (2.75 ± 2.39).

CONCLUSIONS

HOMA-IR values increased significantly in SGA-children during the first year of GH-treatment, remained stable and were within normal ranges in all cases. Our 10-year data suggests that long-term GH treatment does not promote IR and is well-tolerated, safe and effective.

First year metabolic and hormonal behaviour define two different populations of SGA newborn for weight or height

Context

Small for gestational age (SGA) children have a particular metabolic and hormonal pattern at birth that change rapidly.

Objective

To evaluate the linear and weight growth in the first year of life in SGA children.

Design

Prospective, monocentric cohort study.

Setting

Real-world data collected from April 2012 to January 2016.

Patients

SGA newborns uniformly defined by either growth or length lower than -2 standard deviation for gestational age.

Interventions

All children were evaluated for one year after birth, at three days of life, then three, six and 12 months after birth.

Main outcome measures

Anthropometric parameters and biochemical variables, such as blood glucose, insulin, leptin, insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-1, IGF binding protein (IGFBP)3, and HOMA index.

Results

One hundred and thirty-three SGA children were enrolled. Length significantly improved one month after birth, whereas weight significantly increased only three months after birth. Biochemical variables increased during the first year of life, showing a prediction by IGFBP-3 and HOMA-index. Then, the casuistry was divided considering either weight, length or both, showing a different incidence. The biochemical variables changes recorded in the first step were maintained considering SGA children for weight or length, whereas they disappeared when weight and length were considered together.

Conclusions

Our study shows a specific catch-up growth for weight and length in SGA children. Moreover, we highlight that weight and length should be considered as independent parameters in SGA children, defining two different metabolic-hormonal populations with different conceivable predictive role in early catch-up growth and in later growth and metabolic status.