Rapid detection of drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis directly from clinical specimens using allele-specific polymerase chain reaction assay

A multi-AS-PCR-coupled CRISPR/Cas12a assay for the detection of ten single-base mutations

Single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) detection is critical for diagnosing diseases, and the development of rapid and accurate diagnostic tools is essential for treatment and prevention. Allele-specific polymerase chain reaction (AS-PCR) is widely used for detecting SNPs with multiplexing capabilities, while CRISPR-based technologies provide high sensitivity and specificity in targeting mutation sites through specific guide RNAs (gRNAs). In this study, we have integrated the high sensitivity and specificity of CRISPR technology with the multiplexing capabilities of AS-PCR, achieving the simultaneous detection of ten single-base mutations. As for Multi-AS-PCR, our research identified that competitive inhibition of primers targeting the same loci, coupled with divergent amplification efficiencies of these primers, could result in diminished amplification efficiency. Consequently, we adjusted and optimized primer combinations and ratios to enhance the amplification efficacy of Multi-AS-PCR. Finally, we successfully developed a novel nested Multi-AS-PCR-Cas12a method for multiplex SNPs detection. To evaluate the clinical utility of this method in a real-world setting, we applied it to diagnose rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (TB). The limit of detection (LoD) for the nested Multi-AS-PCR-Cas12a was 102 aM, achieving sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 100 %, 93.33 %, 90.00 %, and 100 %, respectively, compared to sequencing. In summary, by employing an innovative design that incorporates a universal reverse primer alongside ten distinct forward allele-specific primers, the nested Multi-AS-PCR-Cas12a technique facilitates the parallel detection of ten rpoB gene SNPs. This method also holds broad potential for the detection of drug-resistant gene mutations in infectious diseases and tumors, as well as for the screening of specific genetic disorders.

Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) Profiling of Extensively Drug-Resistant (XDR) Pathogenic Bacteria in Pulmonary Tuberculosis Patients

Introduction Pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) remains a global health concern, exacerbated by the emergence of extensively drug-resistant (XDR) strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. This study employs advanced molecular techniques, specifically polymerase chain reaction (PCR) profiling, to comprehensively characterize the genetic landscape of XDR pathogenic bacteria in patients diagnosed with pulmonary TB. The objective of the study is to elucidate the genes that are associated with drug resistance in pulmonary TB strains through the application of PCR and analyze specific genetic loci that contribute to the development of resistance against multiple drugs. Materials and methods A total of 116 clinical samples suspected of TB were collected from the tertiary healthcare setting of Saveetha Medical College and Hospitals for the identification of MTB, which includes sputum (n = 35), nasal swabs (n = 17), blood (n = 44), and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) (n = 20). The collected specimens were processed and subjected to DNA extraction. As per the protocol, reconstitution of the DNA pellet was carried out. The reconstituted DNA was stored at -20 °C for the PCR assay. From the obtained positive sample specimens, XDR pulmonary TB specimens were focused on the targeted genes, specifically the rpoB gene for rifampicin resistance, inhA, and katG gene for thepromoter region for isoniazid resistance. Results Out of a total of 116 samples obtained, 53 tested positive for pulmonary TB, indicative of a mycobacterial infection. Among these positive cases, 43 patients underwent treatment at a tertiary healthcare facility. Subsequently, a PCR assay was performed with the extracted DNA for the target genes rpoB, inhA, and katG. Specifically, 22 sputum samples exhibited gene expression for rpoB, inhA, and katG, while nine nasal swabs showed expression of the rpoB and inhA genes. Additionally, rpoB gene expression was detected in seven blood specimens, and both rpoB and inhA genes were expressed in five BAL samples. Conclusion The swift diagnosis and efficient treatment of XDR-TB can be facilitated by employing advanced and rapid molecular tests and oral medication regimens. Utilizing both newly developed and repurposed anti-TB drugs like pretomanid, bedaquiline, linezolid, and ethionamide. Adhering to these current recommendations holds promise for managing XDR-TB effectively. Nevertheless, it is significant to conduct well-designed clinical trials and studies to further evaluate the efficacy of new agents and shorter treatment regimens, thus ensuring continuous improvement in the management of this challenging condition.

Evaluating the Sensitivity of Different Molecular Techniques for Detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex in Patients with Pulmonary Infection

This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of detecting drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC)-specific DNA in sputum specimens from 48 patients diagnosed with pulmonary tuberculosis. The presence of MTBC DNA in the specimens was validated using the GeneXpert MTB/RIF system and compared with a specific PCR assay targeting the IS6110 and the mtp40 gene sequence fragments. Additionally, the results obtained by multiplex PCR assays to detect the most frequently encountered rifampin, isoniazid, and ethambutol resistance-conferring mutations were matched with those obtained by GeneXpert and phenotypic culture-based drug susceptibility tests. Of the 48 sputum samples, 25 were positive for MTBC using the GeneXpert MTB/RIF test. Nevertheless, the IS6110 and mtp40 single-step PCR revealed the IS6110 in 27 of the 48 sputum samples, while the mtp40 gene fragment was found in only 17 of them. Furthermore, multiplex PCR assays detected drug-resistant conferring mutations in 21 (77.8%) of the 27 samples with confirmed MTBC DNA, 10 of which contained single drug-resistant conferring mutations towards ethambutol and two towards rifampin, and the remaining nine contained double-resistant mutations for ethambutol and rifampin. In contrast, only five sputum specimens (18.5%) contained drug-resistant MTBC isolates, and two contained mono-drug-resistant MTBC species toward ethambutol and rifampin, respectively, and the remaining three were designated as multi-drug resistant toward both drugs using GeneXpert and phenotypic culture-based drug susceptibility tests. Such discrepancies in the results emphasize the need to develop novel molecular tests that associate with phenotypic non-DNA-based assays to improve the detection of drug-resistant isolates in clinical specimens in future studies.

Revisiting the methods for detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis: what has the new millennium brought thus far?

Tuberculosis (TB) affects around 10 million people worldwide in 2019. Approximately 3.4 % of new TB cases are multidrug-resistant. The gold standard method for detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis, which is the aetiological agent of TB, is still based on microbiological culture procedures, followed by species identification and drug sensitivity testing. Sputum is the most commonly obtained clinical specimen from patients with pulmonary TB. Although smear microscopy is a low-cost and widely used method, its sensitivity is 50-60 %. Thus, owing to the need to improve the performance of current microbiological tests to provide prompt treatment, different methods with varied sensitivity and specificity for TB diagnosis have been developed. Here we discuss the existing methods developed over the past 20 years, including their strengths and weaknesses. In-house and commercial methods have been shown to be promising to achieve rapid diagnosis. Combining methods for mycobacterial detection systems demonstrates a correlation of 100 %. Other assays are useful for the simultaneous detection of M. tuberculosis species and drug-related mutations. Novel approaches have also been employed to rapidly identify and quantify total mycobacteria RNA, including assessments of global gene expression measured in whole blood to identify the risk of TB. Spoligotyping, mass spectrometry and next-generation sequencing are also promising technologies; however, their cost needs to be reduced so that low- and middle-income countries can access them. Because of the large impact of M. tuberculosis infection on public health, the development of new methods in the context of well-designed and -controlled clinical trials might contribute to the improvement of TB infection control.