Evolution of technology for molecular genotyping in blood group systems

Blood Group Testing

Red blood cell (RBC) transfusion is one of the most frequently performed clinical procedures and therapies to improve tissue oxygen delivery in hospitalized patients worldwide. Generally, the cross-match is the mandatory test in place to meet the clinical needs of RBC transfusion by examining donor-recipient compatibility with antigens and antibodies of blood groups. Blood groups are usually an individual's combination of antigens on the surface of RBCs, typically of the ABO blood group system and the RH blood group system. Accurate and reliable blood group typing is critical before blood transfusion. Serological testing is the routine method for blood group typing based on hemagglutination reactions with RBC antigens against specific antibodies. Nevertheless, emerging technologies for blood group testing may be alternative and supplemental approaches when serological methods cannot determine blood groups. Moreover, some new technologies, such as the evolving applications of blood group genotyping, can precisely identify variant antigens for clinical significance. Therefore, this review mainly presents a clinical overview and perspective of emerging technologies in blood group testing based on the literature. Collectively, this may highlight the most promising strategies and promote blood group typing development to ensure blood transfusion safety.

DNA sequence analysis and Jk blood group genotype-phenotype assessment

Background

The Kidd (JK) blood group is critical for clinical blood transfusion. Various methods for Jk typing have been commonly used, including urea hemolysis, serological test, and genotyping. However, the application of molecular methods has so far been restricted to selected samples and not been applied to the population-scale analysis.

Methods

One hundred eighty-three blood samples, containing 174 samples collected from voluntary blood donors of Chinese Han individuals, together with 3 Jk (aw+b-) and 6 Jk (a-b-) samples, were investigated by standard serology urea hemolysis test and Sanger-sequencing. Complete coverage of exons 4-11 and intron-exon borders have been sequenced.

Results

We report the frequencies of three SNPs in exon 4, 7, and intron 9. Besides, sequence analysis revealed the simultaneous DNA variants of intron 7 (-68) and exon 9 (838) found in all samples, suggesting the co-inheritance of these SNPs-taking the observed SNPs frequencies into account. Further, we discuss the potential of the sequencing technique for high-resolution genotyping.

Conclusions

The described sequencing method for Jk exons delivers a genotyping technique for Jk molecular characterization. According to the co-inheritance of these DNA variants in intron 7 (-68) and exon 9 (838), and their regularity linkage with Jk phenotypes, these two sites offer a potential sequencing target for rapid and far more simplified Jk typing that can supplement routine serology and urea hemolysis tests.

Methods for blood group antigens detection: cost-effectiveness analysis of phenotyping and genotyping

Background

Alloimmunization is a major problem in transfusion practice due to the clinical complications of the patients and the difficulty of choosing a unit of compatible blood product. Serological methods are widely used in blood banks, but they not always determine the phenotype. Thus, genotyping is an important complement to the serology tool as it allows one to predict the phenotype from deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) with high accuracy.

Objective

To compare the centrifugation gel, microarray, Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphismone PCR (PCR-RFLP) and Sequence-Specific Primer PCR (PCR-SSP) techniques, in terms of cost, reaction time and reliability of the results.

Methods

The RHCE, Kidd, Kell and Duffy blood group systems were chosen to determine the approximate cost of each technique, considering the reagents used in both methods and considering only one sample. The time required for the development of each reaction was obtained at the Maringa Regional Blood Center and Immunogenetics Laboratory at the State University of Maringa. Data from Microarray reactions were obtained at the Campinas Blood Center. The results of phenotyping and genotyping of the 16 samples were compiled in a spreadsheet and compared.

Results

The PCR-SSP was more economical compared to other methods, and the serological method was faster than the molecular methods. However, all methods proved to be effective and safe in the detection of erythrocyte antigens.

Conclusion

Analyzing the advantages and limitations of the molecular and serological methods tested in this study, we note that both are important and complementary. However, the choice of a methodology depends on the reality and needs of each health service.