Wolie ZT, Roberts JA, Wale YM, Unwin S, McCarthy K, Sime FB. Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy with carbapenems: A systematic review.
J Infect 2024;
89:106299. [PMID:
39357570 DOI:
10.1016/j.jinf.2024.106299]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2024] [Accepted: 09/24/2024] [Indexed: 10/04/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
To review the literature on parenteral carbapenems in OPAT and present comprehensive evidence on their safety, efficacy, and stability.
METHODS
A systematic review following PRISMA guidelines was conducted through 17 January 2024, using PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library to find relevant articles.
RESULTS
Ertapenem (1 g QD) in OPAT showed high clinical (81-97%) and microbiological (67-90.9%) success rates. Ertapenem (1 g QD) was also comparable to piperacillin/tazobactam (3.375 g every 6 h) for complicated skin infections and superior to cefazolin (2 g every 8 h) and oxacillin (2 g every 4-6 h) for various infections. Ertapenem monotherapy, once daily, achieved an 81% clinical cure rate for urinary tract infections. Additionally, subcutaneous ertapenem in OPAT showed outcomes comparable to parenteral routes. Meropenem continuous infusion (CI) may also be considered safe and effective in selected patient populations; however, its use in OPAT as a CI is limited due to stability concerns.
CONCLUSION
Parenteral carbapenems are effective, and well-tolerated OPAT treatment options; nonetheless, further studies are warranted to optimize the stability and/or dosing regimens of meropenem and enable its wider use.
Collapse