Scintigraphic Evaluation of Esophageal Motility and Gastroesophageal Reflux in Patients Presenting with Upper Respiratory Tract Symptoms

Does the Capsule Method Increase the Accuracy of the Detection of Ger by Scintigraphy Technique?

Background

The scintigraphy technique is the most sensitive test for the detection of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Scintigraphy techniques employ two methods: the liquid method and the capsule method.

Aim

In this prospective study, we are trying to find out the efficiency of the capsule method for gastroesophageal reflux scintigraphy over the liquid method and to determine the ease of execution of the technique and the interpretation of the results.

Materials and Methods

A total of 65 symptomatic patients (age range: 7-71 years; mean age: 35.2 years) were included in the study. They were divided into two groups: group A, which included 18 patients who underwent the liquid method and Group B, which included 47 patients who underwent the capsule method. The average administered dose of 99mTc-labeled sulfur colloid was 11.1-18.5 MBq.

Results

The results showed that 45 (69.12%) of the 65 patients tested positive for GERD. Furthermore, 15 were positive in the liquid method and 30 in the capsule method. Grade III reflux was seen in 66.67% of patients, and 33.33% of patients with Grade II and I reflux were diagnosed using both methods.

Conclusion

Thus, in conclusion, we can say that both liquid and capsule methods are equally sensitive for the detection of low as well as high refluxate volumes.

In-house-Prepared Semisolid Bolus for Esophageal Transit Scintigraphy in Normal Volunteers and its Comparison with Liquid Bolus

Background/Aims:

Esophageal transit scintigraphy (ETS) is a useful tool for evaluating esophageal motility disorders, although conflicting results are seen due to lack of ideal bolus. Semisolid/solid boluses have shown superiority over liquid boluses, and the present study aims to establish the utility of in-house-prepared bolus in normal volunteers and its comparison with liquid bolus.

Materials and Methods:

Thirty-three healthy volunteers were selected for ETS with in-house-prepared semisolid bolus jelly containing ^99mTc-sulfur colloid. Dynamic studies were acquired in anterior projection with single swallow for both supine and sitting positions. T90% esophageal emptying time (EET) was calculated for whole and three equally divided segments of esophagus and also done with liquid bolus on different day.

Results:

The median value of EET for semisolid bolus for whole esophagus in sitting and supine positions was 11.7 s (interquartile range [IQR]: 8.0–16.7) and 17.7 s (IQR: 12.0–33.0). EET of liquid bolus for whole esophagus in sitting and supine positions was 9.3 s (IQR: 8.0–13.3) and 13.0 s (IQR: 9.7–25.0), respectively. Significantly different EET for whole esophagus and lower one-third esophagus between sitting and supine positions was seen for semisolid (whole esophagus;P = 0.003, lower one-third esophagus; P = 0.025) and liquid boluses (whole esophagus; P = 0.032, lower one-third esophagus; P = 0.016). Comparing EET using semisolid and liquid boluses, only lower one-third esophagus in supine position showed significant difference (P = 0.033).

Conclusions:

In-house-prepared semisolid radiolabeled jelly is inexpensive, easy to prepare with good radiolabeling. Condensed dynamic images from semisolid bolus were better, sharper, and reproducible in comparison to liquid bolus without fragmentation. This study standardized semisolid bolus and verified its suitability for clinical use.