Outcomes of corneal transplantation using donor corneas retrieved from patients with chronic kidney disease

The expanding roles of eye banks in India: Past, present, and future

This review highlights the evolution in the scope of eye banking activities in India. The roles and responsibilities of the eye banks have expanded to match the requirements and necessities that arose because of advancements in keratoplasty techniques and the need for corneal surgeons. Adoption of different types of corneal preservation solutions and methods of donor cornea preservation was a consequence of the changing and unprecedented times. The growth of eye banking in India has been a commendable journey and has placed the country in an "almost sufficient" category in eye banking and corneal transplantation. There exists a potential to reach the status of cornea surplus country in the future. The rules and laws governing eye banking operations need dynamic amendments based on the trends in keratoplasty, surgical practice patterns, and status of self-sufficiency. Newer technological advances and quality measures must be adopted in donor cornea evaluation and tissue preparation. Research should be integrated as an important component of eye banking, especially in developing novel methods of donor preservation, and evaluating and validating the existing and changing practices of eye banking.

Donor related corneal graft infection: a review of literature and preventive strategies

PURPOSE

Donor-related infections are a serious threat to patient safety after corneal transplantation. We provide a concise review of literature from the last decade on donor-related graft infections, sources of contamination and means to reduce the contamination of donor tissue and preservation media.

METHODS

We reviewed 50 papers from year 2005 to 2021 related to donor-related graft infections. We included 14 studies related to the risk factors associated with post-keratoplasty infection and preventive methods.

RESULTS

Incidence of post-keratoplasty infections has been reported to be approximately 0.2%-0.77% for endophthalmitis and 6.5%-10.5% for microbial keratitis. We analyzed six important studies regarding the risk factors related to donor contamination. It was observed that younger donor age, increased death to retrieval time, warming cycles and increased eye bank processing time and positive corneo-scleral rim cultures were important risk factors for donor-related infections post keratoplasty. Eye banks have adapted newer protocols over the time period for prevention of donor-related contamination. Recommended preventive strategies were published in about eight important studies over the past decade. In addition to meticulous donor screening, rapid warming cycles, double contact with povidone iodine during retrieval and addition of antifungals like amphotericin B, Voriconazole and cycloheximide have been suggested over the last decade although their use is still in debate with regard to the efficacy, toxicity and cost-effectiveness.

CONCLUSION

The last decade has witnessed a relative rise of fungal infections and multidrug resistant bacterial infections post-keratoplasty. Eye bank prepared corneas for lamellar surgeries are at increased risk for donor contamination due to increased exposure to the higher temperatures during their processing. Addition of antifungals and broad spectrum antibiotics to the hypothermic preservation media needs to be considered in the new era of increasing trends of lamellar keratoplasty.

Endothelial failure and rejection in recipients of corneas from the same donor

Objective

To determine whether patients who receive corneas from the same donor have similar risks of endothelial failure and rejection.

Methods and Analysis

Patients with Fuchs endothelial dystrophy (FED) and pseudophakic bullous keratopathy (PBK) who received their first corneal transplant between 1999 and 2016 were analysed. Patients receiving corneas from donors who donated both corneas for the same indication were defined as ‘paired’. Gray’s test was used to compare the cumulative incidence of endothelial failure and rejection within 5 years post-transplant for ‘paired’ and ‘unpaired’ groups. Cox regression models were fitted to determine whether there was an association between recorded donor characteristics (endothelial cell density (ECD), age and sex and endothelial graft failure and rejection.

Results

10 838 patients were analysed of whom 1536 (14%) were paired. The unpaired group comprised 1837 (69%) recipients of single corneal donors and 7465 (69%) donors who donated both corneas for another indication. ECD was lower for unpaired single cornea donors (p<0.01). There was no significant difference in endothelial graft failure or rejection between paired and unpaired groups for FED (p=0.37, p=0.99) or PBK (p=0.88, p=0.28) nor for donor ECD, age, sex and paired donation after adjusting for transplant factors (across all models p>0.16 for ECD, p>0.32 for donor age, p>0.14 for sex match and p>0.17 for the donor effect).

Conclusion

The absence of a significant difference in graft outcome for corneal transplants for FED and PBK between paired and unpaired donors may reflect a homogeneous donor pool in the UK.