Outcomes of Ahmed glaucoma valve and transscleral cyclophotocoagulation in neovascular glaucoma

Factors Affecting the Results of Ahmed Glaucoma Valve Implantation in Diabetic Neovascular Glaucoma With or Without Previous Pars Plana Vitrectomy

Objectives

The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation (AGVI) in neovascular glaucoma (NVG) due to proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) with or without a pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) history and to analyze the factors affecting surgical failure.

Methods

Patients with NVG secondary to PDR undergoing AGVI at a single center were reviewed retrospectively. The surgical failure rates and post-operative complications were compared between eyes with (PPV-AGVI group) and without previous PPV (AGVI group). Failure was defined as loss of light perception or intraocular pressure (IOP) >17 mmHg despite maximum medication, or need of additional intervention for IOP control or for the management of complications. Survival analysis was investigated by Kaplan-Meier test. The possible factors for failure were analyzed with logistic regression analysis.

Results

The failure rates were 21.9% during the mean follow-up of 27.56±15.38 months and 14.3% during 23.63±12.38 months, in PPV-AGVI group (n=32) and in AGVI group (n=49), respectively (p=0.37). The frequency of complications and surgical intervention need for management of post-operative complications was similar between groups (p>0.05). There was no significant difference in survival analysis (p=0.13). The history of intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injection before AGVI was significantly associated with failure (odds ratio = 26.941, p=0.02).

Conclusion

The results of AGVI performed with long scleral tunnel technique were comparable in terms of failure rates, between NVG patients with and without previous diabetic vitrectomy. The only significant factor for failure was intravitreal anti-VEGF pre-treatment. This may be related to the necessity of anti-VEGF therapy in aggressive PDR, and also, anti-VEGF agents may increase fibrosis in the anterior chamber angle.

[Neovascular Glaucomas - Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, Treatment and Prophylaxis]

Neovascular glaucoma (NVG) is a severe potentially blinding disease, which represents one of the most common types of secondary glaucomas. The majority of cases are caused by ischemic retinal conditions such as diabetic retinopathy, central retinal vein occlusion or ocular ischemic syndrome. If appropriately diagnosed and treated, ideally the development of NVG can be prevented. Since treatment gets increasingly challenging as the disease progresses, early diagnosis is of utmost importance. In this review pathogenesis, diagnosis, treatment and prophylaxis are discussed extensively. A focus is put on the consecutive stages through which the disease progresses and how to diagnose and differentiate them. Ultimately a stage adapted therapy approach is detailed, consisting of the three blocks: 1. treatment of the underlying disease/retinal ischemia, 2. adjunctive medical therapy (anti-VEGF) and 3. therapy of the elevated intraocular pressure.

Defining the role of ab externo Xen gel stent in glaucomatous eyes with prior failed surgical intervention

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of Xen45 Gel stent (Xen; Allergan) in eyes that have failed prior surgical intervention, compared to traditional glaucoma drainage device (GDD) or continuous-wave cyclophotocoagulation (CPC). Since this population has low expected success rates with additional surgery, it is vital to compare to standard-of-care surgical options.

METHODS

Retrospective, single-center, case-control study of ab externo transconjunctival Xen shunt in eyes that have previously undergone trabeculectomy and/or GDD surgery. Postoperative data were collected for 18 months. Failure was defined as no light perception, additional glaucoma surgery required, or intraocular pressure (IOP) of < 6 mmHg after 6 weeks postoperatively.

RESULTS

Eighteen Xen eyes and 36 control eyes matched on both glaucoma type and previous glaucoma surgeries were included. Seventy-two percent had primary open angle glaucoma, 11% uveitic, 6% primary angle closure, 6% pseudoexfoliation, and 6% pigmentary glaucoma. Fifty-six percent of eyes in each group had prior trabeculectomy, 28% of Xen and 31% of control eyes had prior GDD, and 17% of Xen and 14% of control eyes had both. Baseline medicated IOP was lower in the Xen group (21.8 ± 7.2) compared to controls (27.5 ± 9.4, P = 0.043). The cumulative failure rate at year 1 was 17% for Xen and 20% for controls (P = 0.57). Mean survival time was 14.1 (± 1.5) months and 11.4 (± 0.6) months for controls. There was no difference in minor complication rates between groups (P = 0.65), but the Xen group had a significantly lower rate of serious complications (P = 0.043) defined as vision threatening or requiring surgical intervention in the operating room. When censored for additional glaucoma procedures, there were no differences at year 1 in IOP, change in IOP, number of IOP-lowering medications, or number of medications reduced from baseline.

CONCLUSIONS

The Xen shunt provides a reasonable alternative to current standard of care, with a similar failure rate at year 1, with a noninferior IOP reduction compared to GDD and CPC, and a preferred safety profile.