iStent versus iStent inject implantation combined with phacoemulsification in open angle glaucoma

Outcomes of iStent versus endocyclophotocoagulation (ECP) as adjunct to cataract surgery by phacoemulsification for glaucoma patients

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy and safety of iStent versus Endocyclophotocoagulation (ECP) as an adjunct to cataract surgery by Phacoemulsification for treating glaucoma patients in a tertiary eye center.

METHODS

Retrospective study of 67 eyes of 61 patients with glaucoma and cataract who underwent either phaco-ECP or phaco-iStent. Primary efficacy endpoint is the Intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction, while reduction of glaucoma medications is the secondary outcome. In addition to IOP and number of glaucoma medications; visual acuity, degree of disc cupping, safety profiles were all assessed at different intervals up to 12 months.

RESULTS

A total of 40 eyes underwent phaco-ECP, and 27 eyes underwent phaco-iStent. Both groups were associated with a significant reduction in the number of glaucoma medications; however phaco-iStent group achieved slightly lower IOP levels than the phaco-ECP group. Furthermore, iStent inject had better control of IOP at the last follow-up compared to first-generation stents. Moreover; 2 or more stents significantly reduced IOP than single stent (p = 0.009 vs. p = 0.618, respectively). Phaco-iStent achieved a better reduction in the number of glaucoma medications for primary open-angle glaucoma (p = 0.007) compared to pseudoexfoliation glaucoma patients (p = 0.084). Complications were seen in 12 eyes (18%), of which five eyes in phaco-ECP (7.4%) and 7 eyes in phaco-iStent (10.4%), majority were mild and treated conservatively.

CONCLUSIONS

Both groups had equal efficacy in reducing the IOP. However, phaco-iStent seems superior in reducing the number of glaucoma medications after 1 year of follow-up compared to phaco-ECP, particularly when 2 or more stents are used. Both groups showed an overall good safety profile.

Angle-based minimally invasive glaucoma surgery in normal tension glaucoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

This systematic review and meta-analysis quantitatively examines the efficacy of angle-based minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) in normal tension glaucoma (NTG).

METHODS

A literature search was performed on Medline, Embase, PubMed, CINAHL and Cochrane Library from inception until 20 December 2022. Pilot, cohort, observational studies and randomised controlled trials including at least 5 subjects undergoing angle-based MIGS (trabecular-bypass devices, excisional trabeculotomy, goniotomy and ab-interno canaloplasty) for NTG, with or without cataract surgery, were included. Meta-analysis of continuous outcome using the meta routine in R version 2022.12.0+353 was performed to determine mean intraocular pressure (IOP) and anti-glaucoma medication (AGM) reduction post-operatively.

RESULTS

Of the 846 studies initially identified, 15 studies with a pooled total of 367 eyes which underwent combined phacoemulsification and angle-based MIGS were included for final meta-analysis. Outcomes of the iStent were reported in 5 studies, iStent inject in 7 studies, Hydrus Microstent in 1 study, Kahook Dual Blade in 3 studies, and Trabectome in 2 studies. There was significant reduction in both IOP and AGM post-operatively at 6 months (2.44 mmHg, 95%CI: 1.83-3.06; 1.21 AGM, 95%CI: 0.99-1.44), 12 months (2.28 mmHg, 95%CI: 1.71-2.84; 1.18 AGM, 95%CI: 0.90-1.47), 24 months (2.10 mmHg, 95%CI: 1.51-2.68; 1.26 AGM, 95%CI: 0.85-1.68) and 36 months (2.43 mmHg, 95%CI: 1.71-3.15, 0.87 AGM, 95%CI: 0.21-1.53) (all p < 0.05). Subgroup analysis on combined phacoemulsification-iStent inject surgery demonstrated a reduction in both IOP (2.31 mmHg, 95%CI: 1.07-3.56, p < 0.001) and AGM (1.07 AGM, 95%CI: 0.86-1.29, p < 0.001) at 12 months post-operatively.

CONCLUSIONS

Angle-based MIGS combined with phacoemulsification effectively reduces IOP and AGM in NTG eyes for up to 36 months after surgery.

Comparative evaluation of iStent versus iStent inject W combined with phacoemulsification in open angle glaucoma

PURPOSE

The study aimed to compare the 12-month post-operative outcomes of iStent and iStent inject W (inject W), and the factors associated with their success in open-angle glaucoma.

METHODS

This single-center, retrospective comparative case series evaluated the medical records of patients who underwent iStent (comprising 1 stent) or inject W (comprising 2 stents) implantation with cataract surgery for primary open-angle glaucoma and normal tension glaucoma between January 2019 and March 2022. The 12-month post-operative efficacy outcomes included intraocular pressure (IOP), glaucoma medications, and survival analysis of the probability of success. "Failure" was defined as any of the following conditions compared to baseline: 1) IOP elevation, 2) increased glaucoma medication, or 3) IOP decline not exceeding 20% when glaucoma medication scores were comparable, and 4) need for additional glaucoma surgery. The safety outcomes included intra- and post-operative adverse events and changes in the best-corrected visual acuity and visual field.

RESULTS

The study comprised 55 eyes in the iStent and 105 in the inject W groups. At 12 months, treatment success was achieved in 66.0% of iStent and 78.4% of inject W eyes. The mean IOP was lower, and the percent reduction from baseline was equal in iStent-treated eyes (8.0% reduction, 14.8 mmHg to 13.7 mmHg, P<0.01) and inject W-treated eyes (11.9% reduction, 15.0 mmHg to 13.8 mmHg, P<0.01) (between-group comparison, P = 0.23). The mean medication burden decreased significantly from 2.5 to 1.1 for iStent (55.0% reduction, P<0.01) and 2.9 to 1.7 for iStent inject (46.8% reduction, P<0.01), with no significant differences between the two groups (P = 0.17). Both devices exhibited excellent safety.

CONCLUSIONS

Both devices significantly reduced IOP and glaucoma medication 12 months post-operatively. The outcome measures did not differ significantly between the two groups, and lower baseline IOP was predictive of surgical failure.

Consistency in Standalone Canaloplasty Outcomes Using the iTrack Microcatheter

Purpose

To study the consistency in outcomes of standalone canaloplasty performed via an ab-interno surgical technique in reducing intraocular pressure (IOP) and number of medications in uncontrolled open-angle glaucoma (OAG) eyes over a 12-month period.

Methods

This retrospective multicenter case series included patients who underwent standalone canaloplasty via an ab-interno surgical technique using the iTrack microcatheter (Nova Eye, Inc., Fremont, USA) and had preoperative uncontrolled OAG (IOP≥18mmHg) along with no previous glaucoma surgery. The iTrack microcatheter is used to circumnavigate 360° and viscodilate Schlemm's canal. Consistency of IOP and medications reduction on an eye-by-eye basis were evaluated to understand the outcomes in each single eye.

Results

Sixty-four eyes of 60 patients (age 71.5±13.4 years) were included. Six eyes (9%) that underwent additional glaucoma surgery were considered a failure and were subsequently excluded from analysis. At 12 months, IOP was reduced in 57 of the 58 (89%) remaining eyes; one eye had the same IOP with a reduced number of medications. Of the 57/58 eyes with a reduced IOP: 44 eyes (69%) required fewer medications; 12 eyes (19%) required the same number of medications. Of these 58 eyes, 78% of eyes had a ≥20% reduction in IOP compared to baseline; 69% eyes had a postoperative IOP ≤15 mmHg, and 86% eyes ≤18 mmHg at 12 months. Forty percent of the eyes were medication-free at 12 months compared to none at baseline.

Conclusion

Canaloplasty performed via an ab-interno surgical technique as a standalone procedure consistently reduced IOP and glaucoma medications in almost all eyes.

Development and material characteristics of glaucoma surgical implants

Background

Glaucoma is the leading cause of irreversible blindness worldwide. The reduction of intraocular pressure has proved to be the only factor which can be modified in the treatment, and surgical management is one of the important methods for the treatment of glaucoma patients.

Main text

In order to increase aqueous humor outflow and further reduce intraocular pressure, various drainage implants have been designed and applied in clinical practice. From initial Molteno, Baerveldt and Ahmed glaucoma implants to the Ahmed ClearPath device, Paul glaucoma implant, EX-PRESS and the eyeWatch implant, to iStent, Hydrus, XEN, PreserFlo, Cypass, SOLX Gold Shunt, etc., glaucoma surgical implants are currently undergoing a massive transformation on their structures and performances. Multitudinous materials have been used to produce these implants, from original silicone and porous polyethylene, to gelatin, stainless steel, SIBS, titanium, nitinol and even 24-carat gold. Moreover, the material geometry, size, rigidity, biocompatibility and mechanism (valved versus nonvalved) among these implants are markedly different. In this review, we discussed the development and material characteristics of both conventional glaucoma drainage devices and more recent implants, such as the eyeWatch and the new minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) devices.

Conclusions

Although different in design and materials, these delicate glaucoma surgical implants have widely expanded the glaucoma surgical methods, and improved the success rate and safety of glaucoma surgery significantly. However, all of these glaucoma surgical implants have various limitations and should be used for different glaucoma patients at different conditions.

Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery: A Review of the Literature

Minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) has emerged as a novel approach in the glaucoma treatment spectrum, offering a range of diverse procedures and devices aimed at reducing intraocular pressure (IOP). MIGS can be broadly classified into several categories: those that enhance trabecular outflow (Trabectome, iStent, Hydrus Microstent, Kahook Dual Blade, high frequency deep sclerotomy, and gonioscopy-assisted transluminal trabeculotomy), those that augment suprachoroidal outflow (CyPass Microstent and iStent Supra), those that target Schlemm's canal (TRAB360 and the OMNI Surgical System, Streamline, and Ab Interno Canaloplasty), and conjunctival bleb-forming procedures (EX-PRESS Glaucoma Filtration Device, Xen Gel Stent and PreserFlo MicroShunt). MIGS is considered to have a shorter surgical time and fewer severe complications when compared to traditional glaucoma surgeries such as trabeculectomy and glaucoma drainage device implantation (Ahmed, Baerveldt, and Molteno valves). This literature review comprehensively examines the distinct MIGS devices and procedures, their underlying mechanisms, and clinical outcomes, emphasizing the importance of evaluating the efficacy and complications of each approach individually. As the field of MIGS continues to evolve, it is crucial to prioritize high-quality, long-term studies to better understand the safety and effectiveness of these innovative interventions in glaucoma management.

Spotlight on Schlemm's Canal MicroStent Injection in Patients with Glaucoma

Minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) has revolutionized glaucoma care with its favorable safety profile and ability to delay or minimize the need for traditional, bleb-based procedures. Microstent device implantation is a type of angle-based MIGS, which reduces intraocular pressure (IOP) through bypass of the juxtacanalicular trabecular meshwork (TM) and facilitation of aqueous outflow into the Schlemm's canal. Although there are limited microstent devices on the market, multiple studies have evaluated the safety and efficacy of iStent^® (Glaukos Corp.), iStent Inject^® (Glaukos Corp.), and Hydrus^® Microstent (Alcon) in the treatment of mild-to-moderate open-angle glaucoma, with and without concurrent phacoemulsification. This review attempts to provide a comprehensive evaluation of injectable angle-based microstent MIGS devices in the treatment of glaucoma.

[Minimally invasive glaucoma surgery-Comparison of angle based procedures]

Surgical procedures are playing an increasing role in the care of patients with glaucoma. Within the last decade, new surgical procedures have been established, which are summarized under the term minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS). A wide variety of different procedures are aimed at the structures in the angle of the anterior chamber, such as the trabecular meshwork and Schlemm's canal, to improve the physiological outflow or to improve the alternative uveoscleral outflow. The implementation of the treatment goal differs in the individual procedures, as does the maximum pressure reduction that can be achieved. Compared to trabeculectomy with the use of cytostatic agents, the achievable pressure reduction is usually significantly lower. In contrast, the significantly lower intraoperative and postoperative complication rates are emphasized as an advantage of these procedures. With increasing clinical experience and the growth of sufficient data on these new surgical procedures, a well-founded classification in the treatment algorithm of glaucoma surgery becomes easier; nevertheless, due to the small differences with respect to efficacy and safety profile, the final decision for an individual procedure often remains dependent on the surgeon's personal preferences.

The PreserFlo MicroShunt in the Context of Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery: A Narrative Review

Recently, the quest for novel glaucoma surgical techniques and devices has been underway. Trabeculectomy remains the gold standard, but it requires the implantation of glaucoma drainage devices and frequent follow-ups, and it also carries a high risk of serious complications. The need for less invasive and safer procedures has led to the development of minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS), particularly for patients with mild-to-moderate disease. Among them, minimally invasive bleb surgery seems to be effective in classical glaucoma surgery, while maintaining MIGS benefits. The relatively new PreserFlo® MicroShunt (Santen, Osaka, Japan) is registered in Europe. It was released in 2019 for the treatment of patients with early-to-advanced open-angle glaucoma, where intraocular pressure (IOP) remains uncontrolled while on maximum tolerated medication and/or where glaucoma progression warrants surgery. This review focuses on the place of the PreserFlo MicroShunt, characterized by ab externo implantation, among MIGS procedures, discussing its advantages and disadvantages. The mechanisms of action, technical aspects, efficacy, and safety issues are summarized. The surgical technique, its efficacy, and safety profile are described, and directions for future studies are indicated. The PreserFlo MicroShunt ensures a high safety profile, minimal anatomical disruption, meaningful IOP-lowering effect, and ease of use for patients and physicians.

Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery: Safety of Individual Devices

Primary open-angle glaucoma progression in those already on maximal medical therapy has traditionally been treated with trabeculectomy, a surgical procedure that carries a high degree of morbidity. In the last few decades, significant advances have been made in the field of minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) devices, which aim to defer or prevent trabeculectomy via less arduous surgical techniques in certain types of glaucoma. Although reviews have been published examining the efficacy of various MIGS techniques, no article synthesises the comparative safety of all available devices. We performed a literature review examining the safety of MIGS devices. Fifteen devices were included, variously attempting to increase aqueous outflow through the trabecular meshwork or the suprachoroidal space, shunting into the subconjunctival space, or reducing aqueous production through ciliary body ablation. Notably, the earliest product attempting to increase outflow to the suprachoroidal space, Alcon's CyPass Micro-Stent, was withdrawn from the market due to concerns regarding increased corneal endothelial cell loss at five years post-implantation. All other devices were described as well-tolerated, with the most common adverse effects including hyphaema, intraocular pressure spikes, and device migration or obstruction. MIGS devices are purported to be uniformly safe, and many studies report no statistically significant increased complications beyond those associated with cataract surgery alone. It is important to note, however, the generally poor quality of current studies, with a dearth of randomised, or even prospective, data, and a large proportion of studies funded by device producers.

Non-Viral Gene Therapy in Trabecular Meshwork Cells to Prevent Fibrosis in Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery

The primary cause of failure for minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) is fibrosis in the trabecular meshwork (TM) that regulates the outflow of aqueous humour, and no anti-fibrotic drug is available for intraocular use in MIGS. The myocardin-related transcription factor/serum response factor (MRTF/SRF) pathway is a promising anti-fibrotic target. This study aims to utilise a novel lipid nanoparticle (LNP) to deliver MRTF-B siRNA into human TM cells and to compare its effects with those observed in human conjunctival fibroblasts (FF). Two LNP formulations were prepared with and without the targeting peptide cΥ, and with an siRNA concentration of 50 nM. We examined the biophysical properties and encapsulation efficiencies of the LNPs, and evaluated the effects of MRTF-B silencing on cell viability, key fibrotic genes expression and cell contractility. Both LNP formulations efficiently silenced MRTF-B gene and were non-cytotoxic in TM and FF cells. The presence of cΥ made the LNPs smaller and more cationic, but had no significant effect on encapsulation efficiency. Both TM and FF cells also showed significantly reduced contractibility after transfection with MRTF-B siRNA LNPs. In TM cells, LNPs with cΥ achieved a greater decrease in contractility compared to LNPs without cΥ. In conclusion, we demonstrate that the novel CL4H6-LNPs are able to safely and effectively deliver MRTF-B siRNA into human TM cells. LNPs can serve as a promising non-viral gene therapy to prevent fibrosis in MIGS.

Multicenter Effectiveness and Disease Stability Through 3 Years After iStentTrabecular Micro-Bypass with Phacoemulsification in Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension

Purpose

To evaluate 3-year safety and efficacy of two second-generation trabecular micro-bypass stents. (iStent inject^®) with phacoemulsification.

Materials and Methods

This multicenter retrospective study of iStent inject implantation with phacoemulsification included data from eight surgeons across Australia. Eyes with cataract and mild to advanced glaucoma [predominantly primary open-angle (POAG), primary angle closure (PAC), or normal-tension (NTG) glaucoma] or ocular hypertension (OHT) were included. Study assessments included intraocular pressure (IOP); number of ocular hypotensive medications; proportions of eyes with 0, 1, 2, or ≥3 IOP-lowering medications; IOP ≤15 mmHg or ≤18 mmHg; visual fields (VF); retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (RNFL); central corneal thickness (CCT); intraoperative complications; adverse events; and secondary surgeries.

Results

A total of 273 eyes underwent surgery and had 36-month follow-up. At 36 months versus preoperative, mean IOP decreased by 15.5% (16.4±4.6 mmHg to 13.9±3.5 mmHg; p<0.001), and 70.3% of eyes achieved IOP of ≤15 mmHg (versus 49.1% preoperatively; p<0.001). The mean medication burden decreased by 68.5% (from 1.51±1.17 to 0.48±0.89 medications; p<0.001); 71.4% of eyes were medication-free (versus 21.6% preoperatively; p<0.001), while 6.2% of eyes were on ≥3 medications (versus 22.3% preoperatively; p<0.001); 96.3% of eyes maintained or reduced medications vs preoperative. Significant IOP and medication reductions occurred across glaucoma subtypes (POAG, PAC, NTG, OHT): 13–22% for IOP (p<0.05 for all) and 42–94% for medication (p<0.05 for all). Favorable safety included few adverse events; stable VF, RNFL, and CCT; and filtering surgery in only 8 eyes (2.9%) over 3 years.

Conclusion

In this multicenter cohort from 8 surgeons across Australia, significant IOP and medication reductions were sustained through 3 years after iStent inject implantation with phacoemulsification. Results were favorable across different glaucoma subtypes (including POAG, PAC, NTG, OHT), severities, and surgeons, thereby underscoring the real-world relevance and efficacy of iStent inject implantation for glaucoma treatment.