Tubercular subretinal abscess in a pediatric intermediate uveitis patient on methotrexate

Systemic and ocular outcomes in TB-immunoreactive patients receiving immunomodulatory therapy for non-infectious uveitis: a case-control study

BACKGROUND

Tuberculosis (TB)-immunoreactivity, measured in vivo (tuberculin skin test (TST)) or in vitro (interferon gamma release assay (IGRA)), can be found in latent, active or even following clearance of TB infection. In this case-control study, we compared the systemic and ocular outcomes between patients with or without TB-immunoreactivity, who received immunomodulatory therapy (IMT) for non-infectious uveitis.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed charts of patients with (cases) or without (controls) TB-immunoreactivity (TST±IGRA), who received conventional IMT for ≥6 months, for the treatment of non-infectious uveitis. Patients who received prior or concomitant anti-TB therapy were excluded. Systemic and ocular outcomes were compared between both groups.

RESULTS

36 cases and 70 controls (gender-matched and age-matched) were included. New-onset pulmonary or extrapulmonary TB developed in one case and none of the controls. Based on this outcome, the absolute risk increase for systemic TB reactivation was noted to be 0.028 (95% CI 0.005 to 0.051) and the number needed to harm was 36. The incidence of persistent or recurrent (worsening ≥2 grades) intraocular inflammation during IMT was comparable between both groups (cases 18/36, controls 35/70, p=1.0). A change in anatomical site of presentation at recurrence was not seen in any case, but in six controls (p=0.15). No new focal chorio-retinal lesions were noted in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

Conventional IMT has a very low risk of systemic TB reactivation, and no additional detrimental effect on ocular outcomes, in TB-immunoreactive patients with non-infectious uveitis.

Subretinal abscess: causative pathogens, clinical features and management

Purpose

To review the literature on endogenous subretinal abscess (SRA).

Methods

We searched in the literature for the terms ‘subretinal abscess’, ‘chorio-retinal abscess’ and ‘choroidal abscess’.

Results

A total of 122 patients were identified, of whom 20 patients (22 eyes) had no identified systemic infective foci (group 1) and 102 (120 eyes) had systemic infective foci (group 2). The mean age for group 1 was 44.6 years (range 2 weeks-82 years) and for group 2 was 43.2 years (range 1–89 years). The responsible pathogen was identified in 90% and 95% of cases, respectively. In group 1 the most frequent causative agents were Aspergillus and Nocardia, while in group 2 were Nocardia, Mycobacterium Tuberculosis and Klebsiella. In both groups the most common symptoms were reduced vision (70% and 72.5%, respectively), pain (65% and 29.4%, respectively) and redness (35% and 17.6%, respectively). For group 1 there was no difference between mean initial and final visual acuity (1.7 logMAR, range 0–3 logMAR), while for group 2 mean initial and final visual acuities were 0.8 logMAR and 0.6 logMAR, respectively. Final visual acuity was significantly better in group 2 (p = 0.003). Anterior segment inflammation was seen in 77.3% of cases of group 1 and 66.7% of cases of group 2. In both groups the abscess most common locations were posterior pole (45.4% and 32.5%, respectively) and temporal periphery (13.6% and 13.3%, respectively). Clinical features included hemorrhages (76.5% and 76.3%, respectively) and subretinal fluid (75% in both groups). Diabetes mellitus (20% and 25.5%) and immunosuppressive drug intake (35% and 23.5%) were the main predisposing factors for SRA. Combination of systemic and intravitreal antibiotics/antifungals and vitrectomy was the main therapeutic strategy for both groups. Systemic treatment alone was used mainly for cases of tubercular etiology. The timing of vitrectomy differed between the two groups, as it more commonly followed the use of systemic and intravitreal antibiotics in the forms associated with systemic infective foci. Additional abscess drainage or intralesional antibiotics were performed in 23.8% of cases.

Conclusion

At present no guideline exists for the treatment of subretinal abscess. Systemic broad-spectrum antibiotic treatment is of primary importance and should be used in all cases unless contraindicated. Combination of systemic and local treatment is the most frequently adopted strategy.