Outcomes of neonatal retinoblastoma in pre-chemotherapy and chemotherapy eras

Current Indications of Secondary Enucleation in Retinoblastoma Management: A Position Paper on Behalf of the European Retinoblastoma Group (EURbG)

Simple Summary

Although secondary enucleation (SE) is the treatment of choice for retinoblastoma eyes that did not respond favorably to conservative therapies, clear criteria for its indication are, however, currently missing. In this position paper on behalf of the European Retinoblastoma Group (EURbG), we discuss the available literature on SE, including its influence on metastases rate and survival, and propose guidelines to assist decision-making to interrupt eye-preserving therapies depending on the availabilities of advanced diagnostic and therapeutic modalities. Absolute indications to SE may be restricted to eyes with refractory tumor activity resisting all salvage treatments or eyes under apparent tumor control but no visual potential and irreducible complications. In contrast, eyes with an obscured optic nerve head and/or ocular complications amenable to specific surgical or medical management can be considered relative indications, provided that appropriate follow-up can be implemented and that parents are fully aware of a residual risk.

Abstract

Secondary enucleation (SE) puts an irreversible end to eye-preserving therapies, whenever their prolongation is expected to violate the presumed state of metastatic grace. At present, it must be acknowledged that clear criteria for SE are missing, leading to empiric and subjective indications commonly related to disease progression or relapse, disease persistence masking the optic nerve head or treatment-related complications obscuring the fundus view. This absence of evidence-based consensus regarding SE is explained by the continuously moving frontiers of the conservative management as a result of diagnostic and therapeutic advances, as well as by the lack of studies sufficiently powered to accurately stratify the risk of metastasis in conservatively treated patients. In this position paper of the European Retinoblastoma Group (EURbG), we give an overview of the progressive shift in the indications for SE over the past decades and propose guidelines to assist decision-making with respect to when SE becomes imperative or recommended, with corresponding absolute and relative SE indications. Further studies and validation of biologic markers correlated with the risk of metastasis are expected to set more precisely the frontiers of conservative management and thus consensual criteria for SE in the future.

Intra-arterial chemotherapy for retinoblastoma in 341 consecutive eyes (1,292 infusions): comparative analysis of outcomes based on patient age, race, and sex

PURPOSE

To evaluate tumor control and globe salvage following intra-arterial chemotherapy (IAC) for retinoblastoma based on International Classification of Retinoblastoma (ICRB) and patient demographics.

METHODS

The medical records of 313 patients (341 eyes) treated with IAC were reviewed retrospectively. Chemotherapy agents included melphalan, topotecan, and carboplatin. Comparative analysis was performed for tumor control and globe salvage based on ICRB and patient demographics including age (≤12 vs >12 months), race (white vs nonwhite), and sex.

RESULTS

Of the 341 eyes treated with 1,292 consecutive infusions of IAC as primary or secondary therapy for retinoblastoma, Kaplan-Meier 5-year estimates of globe salvage was 74%. Of those treated with IAC as primary therapy (n = 160 eyes; 655 infusions), 5-year globe salvage overall was 76%: and more specifically, 100% for groups B and C, 86% for group D, and 55% for group E. Of those treated with IAC as secondary therapy (n = 207 eyes; 859 infusions), 5-year globe salvage was 71%. Comparative analysis by race and sex demonstrated no differences in outcomes, but analysis by age revealed that younger patients had a higher rate of globe salvage (77% vs 72%; P < 0.001). Complications (per catheterization) included retina ischemia (1%), choroidal ischemia (1%), neovascularization of the disk, retina, iris (NVI), glaucoma (about 1% each), and central/peripheral systemic ischemia (<1%). Younger patients showed less NVI (P = 0.028), white patients showed less retinal ischemia (P = 0.037), and no difference by sex. There were no patients with metastatic disease or death.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that IAC provides substantial tumor control for advanced and/or recurrent retinoblastoma with a high rate of globe salvage and few complications. There was little difference in outcomes per age, race, and sex.

Neonatal Retinoblastoma

Retinoblastoma is the most common ocular malignancy of childhood. With an estimated 300 cases annually in the United States, retinoblastoma is nevertheless considered a rare tumor. Although retinoblastoma primarily affects younger children, diagnosis during the neonatal age range is less common. However, an understanding of patients at risk is critical for appropriate screening. Early detection and treatment by a multidisciplinary specialty team maximizes the chance for survival and ocular/vision salvage while minimizing treatment-related toxicity. Testing for alterations in the RB1 gene has become standard practice, and informs screening and genetic counseling recommendations for patients and their families.