Commentary: Rickettsial retinitis - Direct bacterial infection or an immune-mediated response?

Case Report: Optic neuritis as the initial presentation of Orientia tsutsugamushi infection detected by metagenomic next-generation sequencing

Scrub typhus is an acute febrile illness caused by Orientia tsutsugamushi infection, and typically manifested as fever, eschar, lymphadenopathy, rash, and other flu-like signs. Ocular involvement was not uncommon, and mostly occurred at post-fever or recovery stage in scrub typhus cases. We hereby report a case of scrub typhus presenting as unilateral optic neuritis (ON). A 56-year-old man going wild fishing nearly every day complained of a blurred vision and an inferior visual field defect in the right eye two or three days after an insect-bite like shin induration in his left leg. He was diagnosed as ON, and treated with dexamethasone in the local hospital. Unfortunately, his right eye vision progressively deteriorated during steroid therapy. Three days after steroid therapy ceased, he suffered from a high fever and painful subcutaneous masses in the left groin. Peripheral blood test by metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) was positive for Orientia tsutsugamushi, but negative for other pathogens. The diagnosis was then revised to scrub typhus and ON. His systemic symptoms rapidly disappeared after oral doxycycline and omadacycline therapy. However, his right eye vision continuously deteriorated to hand motion. Further serum tests for aquaporin 4-IgG antibody and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein-IgG antibody were both negative, but for anticardiolipin IgM and beta-2-glycoprotein-I IgM were both positive. The patient's right eye vision gradually improved after doxycycline combined with steroid pulse therapy. Our case indicates that ON in scrub typhus cases may present as a parainfectious inflammation, and that mNGS is a useful and valuable method for early diagnosis of scrub typhus.

Post-fever retinitis - Newer concepts

Post-fever retinitis (PFR) is an infectious or para-infectious uveitic entity caused by bacterial or viral agents and seen mainly in tropical countries. Systemic symptoms such as joint pain, skin rash are common during the febrile stage. On the basis of only clinical presentation, it is difficult to pin-point the exact etiology for PFR. Serological investigations, polymerase chain reaction, and knowledge of concurrent epidemics in the community may help to identify the etiological organism. Bacterial causes of PFR such as rickettsia and typhoid are treated with systemic antibiotics, with or without systemic steroid therapy, whereas PFR of viral causes such as chikungunya, dengue, West Nile virus, and Zika virus have no specific treatment and are managed with steroids. Nevertheless, many authors have advocated mere observation and the uveitis resolved with its natural course of the disease. In this article, we have discussed the clinical features, pathogenesis, investigations, and management of PFR.

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor in the treatment of macular edema in epidemic retinitis

PURPOSE

To study efficacy of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) in resolution of macular edema in epidemic retinitis (ER).

METHODS

In this retrospective, comparative study, patients diagnosed as ER with central macular thickness (CMT) ≥ 600 μm on SD-OCT at presentation were studied. Eyes which did not receive intravitreal anti-VEGF formed group A and eyes receiving additional anti-VEGF formed group B. Eyes receiving anti-VEGF monotherapy were studied separately. Cases with subsequent OCT scans with interval of more than 20 days and cases without OCT scan at the resolution were excluded. Treatment details, visual outcome, and days to resolution of macular edema were studied.

RESULTS

Mean CMT in group A (n = 8) was 820.1 μm (range 607-1004 μm) and in Group B (n = 4) was 756.0 μm (range 603-1000 μm). Macular edema resolved in 34.8 days (range: 16-65) and 39.0 days (range: 21-45) in group A and B, respectively. Two eyes with anti-VEGF monotherapy recovered in 45 and 18 days, respectively. Mean corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) at presentation in group A was 19.1 (range: 0-61) ETDRS letters and in group B was 14.3 (range: 0-35) ETDRS letters. Mean CDVA improved to 65.7 (range: 0-85) and 50.8 (range: 20-76) ETDRS letters in group A and B, respectively. Anti-VEGF monotherapy eyes improved from 35 and 46 ETDRS letters to 70 and 85 ETDRS letters, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Additional anti-VEGF therapy has no added advantage in speed of resolution of macular edema due to ER. A randomized controlled trial with steroids sparing "anti-VEGF monotherapy" may verify our observations.

Epidemic Retinitis with Macular Edema -Treatment Outcome with and without Steroids

Purpose: To study treatment outcomes with and without oral corticosteroids in epidemic retinitis (ER).Method: A retrospective, observational study of 35 eyes of 29 patients diagnosed as ER. Days taken for resolution of macular edema and retinitis lesions were compared in patients treated with oral antibiotics (Group 1) and with corticosteroids-antibiotics combination (Group 2).Result: Eighteen eyes of 14 patients and 17 eyes of 15 patients formed Groups 1 and 2, respectively. At the presentation, mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 40 and 44 letters and mean central macular thickness was 648 (±243) and 626 (±256) microns in Groups 1 and 2, respectively. Macular edema resolved in 30.83 and 31.94 days; retinitis lesions resolved in 36.71 and 41.41 days in Groups 1 and 2, respectively. BCVA improved to 74 and 77 letters in Groups 1 and 2, respectively.Conclusion: ER with macular edema can be well managed without corticosteroids.

An imaging-based treatment algorithm for posterior focal retinitis

Background:

In this paper, our aim was to describe an imaging-based empirical approach for categorizing and initiating treatment of immunocompetent patients with posterior focal retinitis, prior to the availability of results of expensive laboratory investigations.

Materials and methods:

The hospital records of 13 patients with posterior focal retinitis were reviewed.

Results:

Of the 13 patients, 9 were women and 4 were men. The mean age was 24 ± 8 years. Based on similarities in clinical presentation and imaging, we categorized our cases into three groups with different first-line therapeutic strategies. In the first group, patients had presumed toxoplasmosis (treated with oral cotrimoxazole); in the second group, patients had presumed viral (herpetic) etiology (treated with oral valacyclovir); and in the third group, patients had presumed nonherpetic, nontoxoplasma retinitis (treated with oral doxycycline). Positive serology results included Rickettsia (two patients), Borrelia (one patient), Toxoplasma (two patients), and herpes simplex virus (one patient).

Conclusion:

An empirical approach for early initiation of therapy in retinitis cases based on imaging features is described.

Ocular manifestations of rickettsia in children: common but frequently overlooked

We review two cases of ocular manifestations of Rickettsia conorii infection in children. A girl who presented unilateral visual loss with focal retinitis and macular oedema and a boy with unilateral central scotoma and bilateral anterior uveitis. Progressive functional and anatomic recovery was observed after oral antibiotics and steroids were initiated.