Correlation of optical coherence tomography angiography and microperimetry (MP3) features in wet age-related macular degeneration

Analysis of retinal sensitivity between acute and recurrent central serous chorioretinopathy by microperimetry

PURPOSE

To evaluate the retinal sensitivity of macular region in acute and recurrent central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR) using microperimetry.

METHODS

This was a retrospective observational study. Twenty-five eyes of 25 subjects diagnosed with either acute or recurrent CSCR without any previous treatment were included in this study. All subjects underwent complete ophthalmological examinations, including central retinal thickness (CRT) using spectral domain OCT and the retinal sensitivity assessments of macular region using microperimeter MP-3. The mean global macular sensitivity (GMS) of 64 loci in the 20° central macular area and the local macular sensitivity (LMS) of the test locations in affected region of serous retinal detachment (SRD) were analyzed.

RESULTS

Twelve eyes of 12 subjects with acute CSCR (Group A) and 13 eyes of 13 subjects with recurrent CSCR (Group R) were enrolled. Clinical parameters, including age, duration, mean LogMAR best-corrected visual acuity and CRT, were not statistically significant (p =0.688, 0.080, 0.222, 0.394, respectively) between Group A and Group R. There were significant differences in the GMS and LMS between the two groups. Compared to group A (24.9±1.6dB), the mean GMS of group R was significantly (p = 0.018) lower (23.0±2.0dB). Furthermore, the mean LMS of group R (20.8 ± 3.4dB) was also significantly lower (p = 0.026) than that of group A (22.3 ± 3.1dB).

CONCLUSIONS

Recurrent CSCR often show worse retinal function in focal areas of the affected macular areas than in acute CSCR. Microperimetry may be a promising method for distinguish between the acute and recurrent CSCR.

Accuracy and Time Comparison Between Side-by-Side and Artificial Intelligence Overlayed Images

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and the time to find a lesion, taken in different platforms, color fundus photographs and infrared scanning laser ophthalmoscope images, using the traditional side-by-side (SBS) colocalization technique to an artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technique.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifty-three pathological lesions were studied in 11 eyes. Images were aligned using SBS and AI overlaid methods. The location of each color fundus lesion on the corresponding infrared scanning laser ophthalmoscope image was analyzed twice, one time for each method, on different days, for two specialists, in random order. The outcomes for each method were measured and recorded by an independent observer.

RESULTS

The colocalization AI method was superior to the conventional in accuracy and time (P < .001), with a mean time to colocalize 37% faster. The error rate using AI was 0% compared with 18% in SBS measurements.

CONCLUSIONS

AI permitted a more accurate and faster colocalization of pathologic lesions than the conventional method. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 2023;54:108-113.].

Correlation of macular sensitivity measures and visual acuity to vision-related quality of life in patients with age-related macular degeneration

Background

Visual acuity is commonly used as a functional outcome measure in patients with age-related macular degeneration (AMD), despite having a weak correlation with self-perceived visual quality of life. Microperimetry is a useful method of detecting loss of macular function. We wanted to investigate the relationship between these two objective visual outcome measures and subjective vision-related quality of life, finding out which objective measure is more patient-relevant.

Methods

Fifty-one consecutive patients with AMD were recruited to the study. Participants were required to complete the Visual Function Questionnaire 39, the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study visual acuity examination and a microperimetry assessment using the Micro Perimeter 3. One patient withdrew consent and seven patients dropped out due to cooperation difficulties under microperimetry. Forty-three patients with AMD were included in the study: twenty-eight patients with late AMD (exudative AMD) and fifteen patients with early (non-exudative) AMD. The right eye was included as standard, as was the eye with the best-corrected visual acuity.

Results

There was a higher correlation between vision-related quality of life and macular sensitivity (r = 0.458; p = 0.014) than between vision-related quality of life and visual acuity (r = 0.446; p = 0.018) in patients with late AMD. There was a positive correlation between vision-related quality of life and macular sensitivity in patients with early AMD (r = 0.542; p = 0.037) while the correlation between vision-related quality of life and visual acuity in these patients was not statistically significant. Composite score (r = 0.469; p = 0.012) correlated highest with the nasal outer macular sub-region and near-distance activities score (r = 0.652; p < 0.001) correlated highest with the nasal inner macular sub-region in patients with late AMD. Correlations between composite score and macular sub-regions in patients with early AMD were not significant, but near-distance activities score correlated with the nasal outer macular sub-region in these patients (r = 0.469; p = 0.012).

Conclusions

Macular sensitivity as measured using microperimetry correlates with vision-related quality of life in early AMD and in late AMD, showing it to be a patient-relevant outcome measure. Furthermore, the nasal sub-regions of the macula appear to be preferred retinal loci in patients with AMD.

(338 words)

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12886-021-01901-x.

Location and stability of the preferred retinal locus in native Persian-speaking patients with age-related macular degeneration

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The findings of this study can be used in the selection of the preferred retinal locus to establish better rehabilitation services such as eccentric viewing training for patients with age-related macular degeneration.

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to determine the characteristics of the preferred retinal locus in native Persian-speaking patients with age-related macular degeneration.

METHODS

In this non-interventional case series, all patients with a diagnosis of age-related macular degeneration referred to the Retina Clinic of the Rassoul Akram Hospital, Tehran, Iran, were evaluated. The fixation characteristics were evaluated monocularly using the MP1 microperimeter (Nidek Technologies, Padua, Italy). Optical coherence tomography was used to determine the location of the central fovea. The images were overlaid and the preferred retinal locus-fovea distance was measured using Image J software.

RESULTS

Fifty-one eyes of 35 patients with a mean age of 73.8 ± 7.7-years were evaluated in this study. Inferior-field, left-field, central-field, right-field, and superior-field preferred retinal locus were detected in 49 per cent, 33.3 per cent, 7.8 per cent, 5.9 per cent, and 3.9 per cent of the subjects, respectively. Fixation was stable in 70.6 per cent, relatively unstable in 15.7 per cent, and unstable in 13.7 per cent of the participants. Significant differences were not found in the mean values of logMAR visual acuity between different fields of the preferred retinal locus after Bonferroni correction (p = 0.031). Analysis of co-variance showed no significant difference in mean sensitivity values between different locations of the preferred retinal locus (p = 0.07). The mean preferred retinal locus-fovea distance was not significantly different between different fields of the preferred retinal locus (p = 0.063).

CONCLUSIONS

Native Persian-speaking patients with central scotoma secondary to age-related macular degeneration place their self-selected preferred retinal locus most frequently in the inferior and left visual field, which would result in scotoma displacement to the superior and right visual field. Fixation stability was statistically similar in different locations of preferred retinal locus, but it improved with decreasing the preferred retinal locus-fovea distance.

Evaluation of retinal function improvement in neovascular age-related macular degeneration after intravitreal aflibercept injections with the use of the assessment of retinal sensitivity: The use of the assessment of retinal sensitivity in anti-VEGF treatment - a STROBE-compliant observational study

This study compares 2 methods of macular function evaluation: the microperimetric examination (mean central retinal sensitivity and fixation stability) and the distance best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) examination, which is the most frequently used method of assessing macular function in patients with newly diagnosed wet age-related macular degeneration (AMD) who have been treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) drug (aflibercept).Prospective analysis was conducted on 44 eyes of 44 patients treated with intravitreal injection of anti-VEGF (aflibercept) because of newly diagnosed neovascular AMD. According to the research protocol, all patients had a 6-month follow-up. The response to treatment was monitored functionallybyMP-1 microperimetry, fixation, and distance BCVA assessment after injection. Improvement of retinal sensitivity and BCVA was found under aflibercept treatment. There was statistically significant improvement in retinal sensitivity in the MP-1 study 3 and 6 months from the beginning of anti-VEGF therapy. Moreover, a significant improvement in retinal sensitivity between 3 and 6 months of observation was demonstrated. At the same time, up to 3 months from the beginning of treatment, BCVA improved significantly compared to the baseline value. In the 6th month of the study BCVA remained stable without further significant improvement.Microperimetric examination with medium sensitivity and fixation stability assessment is a very valuable test determining the retinal function. It is clear that examining the macular morphology itself in modern diagnostics is not enough to assess retinal function. Microperimetry technique is a valuable tool for functional long-term evaluation of retinal function (also for a period of more than 3 months).