Prognostic Factors of 30-day Survival of Patients with Malignant Pleural Effusion

The Association Between Pleural Fluid Exposure and Survival in Pleural Mesothelioma

BACKGROUND

Most patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) seek treatment with malignant pleural effusion (MPE). In vitro evidence suggests that MPE may not be a simple bystander of malignancy, but rather potentially has biological properties that improve cancer cell survival and promote cancer progression. If this is the case, MPE management may need to shift from current symptomatic strategies to aggressive fluid removal to impact survival.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Is there an association between pleural fluid exposure and survival in MPM?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Data from 761 patients who received a diagnosis of MPM between 2008 and 2018 were collected from patient medical records in three UK pleural units. Data included factors previously identified as influencing prognosis in MPM. Medical imaging was reviewed for presence, size, and duration of pleural effusion. Time-dependent covariate analysis of pleural fluid exposure and survival (model included weight loss, serum albumin, hemoglobin, MPM subtype, performance status, chemotherapy, and age) and multivariate Cox regression analysis of pleurodesis and survival were conducted.

RESULTS

Median overall survival was 278 days (interquartile range, 127-505 days; 95% CI, 253-301 days). Pleural fluid exposure duration showed no association with survival (hazard ratio, 1.0; 95% CI, 1.0-1.0). Median survival was 473, 378, and 258 days with complete, partial, and no pleurodesis (P = .008).

INTERPRETATION

Pleurodesis success seems to be associated with improved survival; however, it is unclear whether duration of MPM exposure to pleural fluid is associated with survival within the limitations of this retrospective study. Future prospective studies are required to assess this potentially important mechanism.

Malignant Pleural Effusion and Its Current Management: A Review

Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is an exudative effusion with malignant cells. MPE is a common symptom and accompanying manifestation of metastatic disease. It affects up to 15% of all patients with cancer and is the most common in lung, breast cancer, lymphoma, gynecological malignancies and malignant mesothelioma. In the last year, many studies were performed focusing on the pathophysiological mechanisms of MPE. With the advancement in molecular techniques, the importance of tumor-host cell interactions is becoming more apparent. Additionally, the process of pathogenesis is greatly affected by activating mutations of EGFR, KRAS, PIK3CA, BRAF, MET, EML4/ALK and RET, which correlate with an increased incidence of MPE. Considering all these changes, the authors aim to present a literature review of the newest findings, review of the guidelines and pathophysiological novelties in this field. Review of the just recently, after seven years published, practice guidelines, as well as analysis of more than 70 articles from the Pubmed, Medline databases that were almost exclusively published in indexed journals in the last few years, have relevance and contribute to the better understanding of the presented topic. MPE still presents a severe medical condition in patients with advanced malignancy. Recent findings in the field of pathophysiological mechanisms of MPE emphasize the role of molecular factors and mutations in the dynamics of the disease and its prognosis. Treatment guidelines offer a patient-centric approach with the use of new scoring systems, an out of hospital approach and ultrasound. The current guidelines address multiple areas of interest bring novelties in the form of validated prediction tools and can, based on evidence, improve patient outcomes. However, the role of biomarkers in a clinical setting, possible new treatment modalities and certain specific situations still present a challenge for new research.

Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of elemene in treating malignant pleural effusion caused by tumors: A PRISMA guided meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Elemene is widely used to treat malignant pleural effusion in China. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of elemene in treating malignant pleural effusion.

METHODS

Electronic databases including Pubmed, the Cochrane Library, Embase and Chinese biomedical literature database were searched until March 2017. Clinical controlled trials (CCTs) assessing the efficacy and safety of elemene in the treatment of malignant pleural effusion were included. The quality of the included studies was evaluated using the quality evaluation criteria of the Cochrane Handbook version 5.1.0.

RESULTS

A total of 46 CCTs were included, with 2992 patients. Results of meta-analysis showed that elemene significantly improved the overall response rate (ORR) in controlling malignant pleural effusion (risk ratio [RR] = 1.16; 95% CI: 1.08-1.23; P < .05). Subgroup results showed that the ORR of elemene in the treatment of lung cancer patients with malignant pleural effusion (RR = 1.20, 95% CI: 1.07-1.34; P < .05) was higher than that of other cancers (RR = 1.14, 95% CI: 1.05-1.23; P < .05). Meanwhile, elemene did not significantly increase the incidences of chest pain and fever (P > .05).

CONCLUSION

Elemene is suggested to have the ability of improving the treatment outcome of malignant pleural effusion with acceptable safety.