Does tumor stroma ratio of breast cancer trucut biopsy determine response to neoadjuvant therapy?

Combining the tumor-stroma ratio with tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes improves the prediction of pathological complete response in breast cancer patients

PURPOSE

The tumor-stroma ratio (TSR) is a common histological parameter that measures stromal abundance and is prognostic in breast cancer (BC). However, more evidence is needed on the predictive value of the TSR for the pathological complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). The purpose of this study was to determine the importance of the TSR in predicting pCR in NAC settings.

METHOD

We evaluated the TSR on pretreatment biopsies of 912 BC patients from four independent Chinese hospitals and investigated the potential value of the TSR for predicting pCR. Meanwhile, stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) were assessed, and we evaluated the predictive value of the combination of sTILs and TSR (TSRILs).

RESULTS

Patients with low stroma showed a higher pCR rate than those with high stroma among the four independent hospitals, and in multivariate analysis, the TSR was proven to be an independent predictor for pCR to NAC with an odds ratio of 1.945 (95% CI 1.230-3.075, P = 0.004). Moreover, we found that TSRILs could improve the area under the curve (AUC) for predicting pCR from 0.750 to 0.785 (P = 0.039); especially in HER2-negative BCs, the inclusion of TSRILs increased the AUC from 0.801 to 0.835 in the discovery dataset (P = 0.048) and 0.734 to 0.801 in the validation dataset (P = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

TSR and sTILs can be easily measured in pathological routines and provide predictive information without additional cost; with more evidence from clinical trials, TSRILs could be a candidate to better stratify patients in NAC settings.

Tumour-stroma ratio (TSR) in breast cancer: comparison of scoring core biopsies versus resection specimens

PURPOSE

Tumour-stroma ratio (TSR) is an important prognostic and predictive factor in several tumour types. The aim of this study is to determine whether TSR evaluated in breast cancer core biopsies is representative of the whole tumour.

METHOD

Different TSR scoring methods, their reproducibility, and the association of TSR with clinicopathological characteristics were investigated in 178 breast carcinoma core biopsies and corresponding resection specimens. TSR was assessed by two trained scientists on the most representative H&E-stained digitised slides. Patients were treated primarily with surgery between 2010 and 2021 at Semmelweis University, Budapest.

RESULTS

Ninety-one percent of the tumours were hormone receptor (HR)-positive (luminal-like). Interobserver agreement was highest using 100 × magnification (κ_core = 0.906, κ_{resection specimen} = 0.882). The agreement between TSR of core biopsies and resection specimens of the same patients was moderate (κ = 0.514). Differences between the two types of samples were most frequent in cases with TSR scores close to the 50% cut-off point. TSR was strongly correlated with age at diagnosis, pT category, histological type, histological grade, and surrogate molecular subtype. A tendency was identified for more recurrences among stroma-high (SH) tumours (p = 0.07). Significant correlation was detected between the TSR and tumour recurrence in grade 1 HR-positive breast cancer cases (p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

TSR is easy to determine and reproducible on both core biopsies and in resection specimens and is associated with several clinicopathological characteristics of breast cancer. TSR scored on core biopsies is moderately representative for the whole tumour.

Investigating the role of core needle biopsy in evaluating tumor-stroma ratio (TSR) of invasive breast cancer: a retrospective study

PURPOSE

Tumor-stroma ratio (TSR) of invasive breast carcinoma has gained attention in recent years due to its prognostic significance. Previous studies showed TSR is a potential biomarker for indicating the tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. However, it is not clear how well TSR evaluation in biopsy specimens might reflect the TSR in resection specimens. We conducted a study to investigate whether biopsy evaluation of TSR can be an alternative method.

METHOD

We collected cases with invasive breast carcinoma of no special type (IBC-NST) from University of Yamanashi hospital between 2011 and 2017 whose biopsy and resection specimens both had a pathologically diagnosis of IBC-NST (n = 146). We conceptualized a method for evaluating TSR in biopsy specimens within a preliminary cohort (n = 50). Within the studied cohort (n = 96), biopsy-based TSR (b-TSR) and resection-based TSR (r-TSR) were scored by two pathologists. We then evaluated our method's validity and performance by measuring interobserver variability between the two pathologists, Spearman's correlation between b-TSR and r-TSR, and the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis for defining stroma-rich and stroma-poor tumors.

RESULTS

Intra-class coefficient between the two pathologists was 0.59. The correlation coefficients between b-TSR and r-TSR in the two pathologists were 0.45 and 0.37. The ROC areas under the curve were 0.7 and 0.67. By considering an r-TSR of < 50% as stroma-rich, the sensitivity and specificity of detecting stroma-rich tumors were 64.1% and 66.7%, respectively, when b-TSR was < 40%.

CONCLUSION

Our current b-TSR evaluation method can provide information about r-TSR and facilitate pre-treatment therapy follow-up.

Standardization of the tumor-stroma ratio scoring method for breast cancer research

Purpose

The tumor-stroma ratio (TSR) has repeatedly proven to be correlated with patient outcomes in breast cancer using large retrospective cohorts. However, studies validating the TSR often show variability in methodology, thereby hampering comparisons and uniform outcomes.

Method

This paper provides a detailed description of a simple and uniform TSR scoring method using Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E)-stained core biopsies and resection tissue, specifically focused on breast cancer. Possible histological challenges that can be encountered during scoring including suggestions to overcome them are reported. Moreover, the procedure for TSR estimation in lymph nodes, scoring on digital images and the automatic assessment of the TSR using artificial intelligence are described.

Conclusion

Digitized scoring of tumor biopsies and resection material offers interesting future perspectives to determine patient prognosis and response to therapy. The fact that the TSR method is relatively easy, quick, and cheap, offers great potential for its implementation in routine diagnostics, but this requires high quality validation studies.

Tumor-stroma ratio is associated with Miller-Payne score and pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-negative early breast cancer

The tumor-stroma ratio (TSR) has proven to be a strong prognostic factor in breast cancer, demonstrating better survival for patients with stroma-low tumors. Since the role of the TSR as a predictive marker for neoadjuvant chemotherapy outcome is yet unknown, this association was evaluated for HER2-negative breast cancer in the prospective DIRECT and NEOZOTAC trials. The TSR was assessed on 375 hematoxylin and eosin-stained sections of pre-treatment biopsies. Associations between the TSR and chemotherapy response according to the Miller-Payne (MP) grading system, and between the TSR and pathological response were examined using Pearson's chi-square, Cochran-Armitage test for trend and regression analyses. A stroma-low tumor prior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy was significantly associated with a higher MP score (P = .005). This relationship remained significant in the estrogen receptor (ER)-negative subgroup (P = .047). The univariable odds ratio (OR) of a stroma-low tumor on pathological complete response (pCR) was 2.46 (95% CI 1.34-4.51, P = .004), which attenuated to 1.90 (95% CI 0.85-4.25, P = .119) after adjustment for relevant prognostic factors. Subgroup analyses revealed an OR of 5.91 in univariable analyses for ER-negativity (95% CI 1.19-29.48, P = .030) and 1.48 for ER-positivity (95% CI 0.73-3.01, P = .281). In conclusion, a low amount of stroma on pre-treatment biopsies is associated with a higher MP score and pCR rate. Therefore, the TSR is a promising biomarker in predicting neoadjuvant treatment outcome. Incorporating this parameter in routine pathological diagnostics could be worthwhile to prevent overtreatment and undertreatment.