A Comment on JAK Inhibitors for Treatment of Alopecia Areata

A Real-World Study of Steroid-Free Monotherapy with Tofacitinib in Severe and Therapy-Recalcitrant Alopecia Areata, Alopecia Totalis, and Alopecia Universalis Cases: A Retrospective Analysis

Background

Alopecia areata (AA) presents with noncicatricial alopecia and has multifactorial etiology. Janus Kinase inhibitors (JAKibs) with potential efficacy and favorable side-effect profile are the first class of drugs to receive FDA approval in AA.

Objectives

Our primary objective was to assess the complete response rates to tofacitinib monotherapy in severe and recalcitrant AA, alopecia totalis (AT), and alopecia universalis (AU) patients using the latest percentage change in Severity of alopecia tool (SALT) score. We also aimed to analyze the various systemic agents used by these patients prior to the use of tofacitinib.

Materials and Methods

Institutional records of 17 patients with severe or refractory AA, AT, and AU treated with tofacitinib monotherapy were analyzed, retrospectively. The response to tofacitinib therapy was determined after calculating percentage change in SALT score. End of treatment was defined as the dose which resulted in a significant response (complete/near complete response was ≥75% hair regrowth from baseline as determined by SALT score).

Results

Majority of patients had severe AA (SALT ≥ 50) (n = 9/17, 52.94%), while five patients had AT and three had AU. All patients had received either systemic glucocorticoids (GCS), which included oral mini pulse (OMP) (n = 8), intravenous pulse steroids (n = 4), and daily oral GCS (n = 6) or immunosuppressive agents (ISAs) which included cyclosporine (n = 14) followed by methotrexate (n = 6) and azathioprine (n = 6). Mean SALT score prior to starting tofacitinib was 74.23. Mean dose of tofacitinib used was 13.23 mg (10-15 mg) and mean duration of treatment was 9.23 months. Latest percentage change of SALT score ranged from 70.58% to 100%, with an average of 91.47%. Most patients showed complete/near complete response (13/17, 76.47%).

Conclusion

Tofacitinib was found to be safe and effective in severe/refractory AA, AU, and AT patients recalcitrant to other treatment modalities in our study. Further studies are needed to assess the effect of these targeted drugs on JAK-STAT expression or tissue cytokines involved in the pathogenesis of AA using immunohistochemistry.

Safety of Janus Kinase inhibitors in Patients with Alopecia Areata: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors are emerging as a therapeutic option for alopecia areata. The risk of potential adverse events is currently debated. In particular, several safety data for JAK inhibitors are extrapolated from a single study in elderly patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with tofacitinib or adalimumab/etanercept as a comparator. The population of patients with alopecia areata is clinically and immunologically different from persons with rheumatoid arthritis and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors are not effective in these patients. The objective of this systematic review was to analyze available data on the safety of various JAK inhibitors in patients with alopecia areata.

METHODS

The systematic review was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A literature review was performed by searching PubMed, Scopus and EBSCO databases with the last search on March 13, 2023.

RESULTS

In total, 36 studies were included. The frequency and odds ratio (OR) for most common adverse events versus placebo were: for baricitinib hypercholesterolemia (18.2% vs 10.5%, OR = 1.9) and headache (6.1% vs 5.1%, OR = 1.2), for brepocitinib elevated creatinine level (27.7% vs 4.3%, OR = 8.6) and acne (10.6% vs 4.3%, OR = 2.7), for ritlecitinib acne (10.4% vs 4.3%, OR = 2.6) and headache (12.5% vs 10.6%, OR = 1.2) and for deuruxolitinib headache (21.4% vs 9.1%, OR = 2.7) and acne (13.6% vs 4.5%, OR = 3.3). The respective numbers for upper respiratory infections were: baricitinib (7.3% vs 7.0%, OR = 1.0) and brepocitinib (23.4% vs 10.6%, OR = 2.6); for nasopharyngitis: ritlecitinib (12.5% vs 12.8%, OR = 1.0) and deuruxolitinib (14.6% vs 2.3%, OR = 7.3).

CONCLUSIONS

The most common side effects of JAK inhibitors in patients with alopecia areata were headache and acne. The OR for upper respiratory tract infections varied from over 7-fold increased to comparable to placebo. The risk of serious adverse events was not increased.

Janus Kinase Inhibitors in the Treatment of Alopecia Areata

Alopecia areata is a disease of autoimmune origin which causes non scarring hair loss. The extent of alopecia varies from a small patch to complete scalp and body hair loss, which can have huge psychosocial impact for those affected. Treatment modalities which have been used so far included nonspecific immunosuppressive medications, such as corticosteroids, cyclosporine, and methotrexate, or topical immunomodulators, such as diphencyprone, dithranol, and squaric acid dibutylester. The recognition of the importance of Janus kinase pathway in alopecia areata pathogenesis enabled more specific approaches in treatment. Positive outcomes of Janus kinase inhibitors in several trials granted approval for baricitinib which became the first on-label treatment for alopecia areata. The aim of this review is to summarize the role, efficacy and safety of several Janus kinase inhibitors in alopecia areata.

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Janus Kinase Inhibitors Used in Alopecia Areata: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of treatment with Janus kinase inhibitors for alopecia areata, measured by change in Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) score. A systematic review following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines was performed using Medline, EMBASE and Cochrane library. All studies investigating the efficacy of treatments for alopecia areata were included. Primary outcomes were the proportion of patients with alopecia areata achieving 30%, 50%, 75%, 90% and 100% improvement in SALT score after treatment with a Janus kinase inhibitor. A meta-analysis was performed including all randomized controlled trials investigating Janus kinase inhibitors. A total of 37 studies matched the inclusion criteria and were included. Meta-analysis was performed based on 5 randomized studies. Regarding patients with alopecia areata defined as ≥ 50% scalp hair loss, baricitinib 4 mg once daily demonstrated the highest efficacy. However, among patients with alopecia areata defined as a SALT score ≥ 50, oral deuruxolitinib 12 mg twice daily demonstrated the highest efficacy. Deuruxolitinib and baricitinib appear to be promising drugs for the treatment of alopecia areata. However, the response depends on the dosage of the drug. More randomized trials, with identical inclusion criteria and dose and duration of treatment, are required to confirm these findings.

A Comprehensive Literature Review of JAK Inhibitors in Treatment of Alopecia Areata

Alopecia areata (AA) is a chronic, immune-mediated form of nonscarring alopecia that is multifactorial and results in localized patches. It is often described as a self-limiting condition that results in the spontaneous regrowth of hair in most cases. However, this regrowth may take several months or years to occur in some patients, leading to the development of psychoemotional trauma in those that are affected. Although several therapies for AA have been developed and tested, there is no specific treatment that has been approved, leading to the availability of many off-label conventional treatment options, with very limited responses. More recently, with the advancement of pre-clinical and genetic studies, a greater understanding of the pathomechanisms involved in the development of AA has been uncovered. This has resulted in the introduction of targeted therapies that use small molecules to block specific pathways involved in AA pathophysiology. As such, the use of janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors for treatment of AA has emerged. JAK inhibitors block the T-cell mediated inflammatory response thought to be the driving factor behind AA pathogenesis, by inhibiting the janus kinase (JAK) signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) signaling pathway, leading to a reversal of hair loss in AA patients. Thus, in an effort to demonstrate the efficacy of JAK inhibitors in the treatment of AA, several studies have been published within recent years. However, the question remains, “Are JAK inhibitors effective and safe in the management of Alopecia Areata?”. This review aims to provide a comprehensive report on the role, efficacy, and outcomes of using JAK inhibitors in the treatment of AA. To competently answer the research question highlighted, the most recent, quality articles published over a 10–15-year period were sourced using PubMed, NCBI, Research gate, Medline, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EMBASE and Google scholar. The literature search was primarily focused on randomized controlled trials (RCTs); however, in the absence of such, only the most recently published case reports, case series, clinical trials and open-label studies published to date were included.

Frontiers in alopecia areata pathobiology research

This current review explores selected and as yet insufficiently investigated frontiers in current alopecia areata (AA) pathobiology research, with an emphasis on potential "new" players in AA pathobiology that deserve more systematic exploration and therapeutic targeting. Indeed, new evidence suggests that CD8⁺ T cells, which have long been thought to be the central players in AA pathobiology, are not the only drivers of disease. Instead, subsets of natural killer (NK) and so-called "unconventional" T cells (invariant NK T cells, γδ T cells, classic NK cells, and type 1 innate lymphoid cells), all of which can produce large amounts of IFN-γ, might also drive AA pathobiology independent of classical, autoantigen-dependent CD8⁺ T-cell functions. Another important new frontier is the role of regulatory lymphocyte subsets, such as regulatory T cells, γδ regulatory T cells, NKT10 cells, and perifollicular mast cells, in maintaining physiologic hair follicle immune privilege (IP); the extent to which these functions are defective in patients with AA; and how this IP-protective role could be restored therapeutically in patients with established AA. Broadening our AA research horizon along the lines suggested above promises not only to open the door to innovative and even more effective immunotherapy strategies for AA but will also likely be relevant for other autoimmune disorders in which pathobiology, ectopic MHC class I expression, and IP collapse play an important role.