1
|
Sauro KM, Smith C, Ibadin S, Thomas A, Ganshorn H, Bakunda L, Bajgain B, Bisch SP, Nelson G. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Guidelines and Hospital Length of Stay, Readmission, Complications, and Mortality: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7:e2417310. [PMID: 38888922 PMCID: PMC11195621 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.17310] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2024] [Accepted: 04/17/2024] [Indexed: 06/20/2024] Open
Abstract
Importance A comprehensive review of the evidence exploring the outcomes of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) guidelines has not been completed. Objective To evaluate if ERAS guidelines are associated with improved hospital length of stay, hospital readmission, complications, and mortality compared with usual surgical care, and to understand differences in estimates based on study and patient factors. Data Sources MEDLINE, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Cochrane Central were searched from inception until June 2021. Study Selection Titles, abstracts, and full-text articles were screened by 2 independent reviewers. Eligible studies were randomized clinical trials that examined ERAS-guided surgery compared with a control group and reported on at least 1 of the outcomes. Data Extraction and Synthesis Data were abstracted in duplicate using a standardized data abstraction form. The study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. Risk of bias was assessed in duplicate using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to pool estimates for each outcome, and meta-regression identified sources of heterogeneity within each outcome. Main Outcome and Measures The primary outcomes were hospital length of stay, hospital readmission within 30 days of index discharge, 30-day postoperative complications, and 30-day postoperative mortality. Results Of the 12 047 references identified, 1493 full texts were screened for eligibility, 495 were included in the systematic review, and 74 RCTs with 9076 participants were included in the meta-analysis. Included studies presented data from 21 countries and 9 ERAS-guided surgical procedures with 15 (20.3%) having a low risk of bias. The mean (SD) Reporting on ERAS Compliance, Outcomes, and Elements Research checklist score was 13.5 (2.3). Hospital length of stay decreased by 1.88 days (95% CI, 0.95-2.81 days; I2 = 86.5%; P < .001) and the risk of complications decreased (risk ratio, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.59-0.87; I2 = 78.6%; P < .001) in the ERAS group. Risk of readmission and mortality were not significant. Conclusions and Relevance In this meta-analysis, ERAS guidelines were associated with decreased hospital length of stay and complications. Future studies should aim to improve implementation of ERAS and increase the reach of the guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Khara M. Sauro
- Department of Community Health Sciences and O’Brien Institute of Public Health, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Surgery, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Oncology and Charbonneau Cancer Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Christine Smith
- Department of Community Health Sciences and O’Brien Institute of Public Health, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Seremi Ibadin
- Department of Community Health Sciences and O’Brien Institute of Public Health, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Abigail Thomas
- Department of Community Health Sciences and O’Brien Institute of Public Health, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Heather Ganshorn
- Libraries and Cultural Resources, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Linda Bakunda
- Department of Community Health Sciences and O’Brien Institute of Public Health, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Bishnu Bajgain
- Department of Community Health Sciences and O’Brien Institute of Public Health, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Steven P. Bisch
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Gregg Nelson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Ariadne Labs, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ma R, Sheybaee Moghaddam F, Ghoreifi A, Ladi-Seyedian S, Cai J, Miranda G, Aron M, Schuckman A, Desai M, Gill I, Daneshmand S, Djaladat H. The effect of enhanced recovery after surgery on oncologic outcome following radical cystectomy for urothelial bladder carcinoma. Surg Oncol 2024; 54:102061. [PMID: 38513372 DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2024.102061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2023] [Revised: 02/13/2024] [Accepted: 03/07/2024] [Indexed: 03/23/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Limited data are available regarding the effect of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols on the long-term outcomes of radical cystectomy (RC) in bladder cancer patients. The aim of this study is to evaluate the oncological outcomes in patients who underwent RC with ERAS protocol. METHODS We reviewed the records of patients who underwent RC for primary urothelial bladder carcinoma with curative intent from January 2003 to August 2022. The primary and secondary outcomes were recurrence-free (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Multivariable Cox regression analysis was performed to evaluate the effect of ERAS on oncological outcomes. RESULTS A total of 967 ERAS patients and 1144 non-ERAS patients were included in this study. The RFS rates at 1, 3, and 5 years after RC were 81%, 71.5%, and 69% in the ERAS cohort, respectively. This rate in the non-ERAS group was 81%, 71%, and 67% at 1, 3, and 5 years after RC, respectively (P = 0.50). However, ERAS patients had significantly better OS with 86%, 73%, and 67% survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years compared to 84%, 68%, and 59.5% survival rates in the non-ERAS group, respectively (P = 0.002). In multivariable analysis adjusting for other relevant factors, ERAS was no longer independently associated with recurrence-free (HR = 0.96, 95% CI 0.76-1.22, P = 0.75) or overall survival (HR = 0.84, 95% CI 0.66-1.09, P = 0.28) following RC. CONCLUSION ERAS protocols are associated with a shorter hospital stay, yet with no impact on long-term oncologic outcomes in patients undergoing RC for bladder cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Runzhuo Ma
- Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | - Alireza Ghoreifi
- Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Sanam Ladi-Seyedian
- Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jie Cai
- Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Gus Miranda
- Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Monish Aron
- Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Anne Schuckman
- Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Mihir Desai
- Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Inderbir Gill
- Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Siamak Daneshmand
- Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Hooman Djaladat
- Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ding W, Ji R, Abdelrahim MEA, Wang L. Enhanced pharmaceutical recovery as postoperative standard care after radical cystectomy: A meta-analysis. Actas Urol Esp 2022; 46:447-455. [PMID: 36109315 DOI: 10.1016/j.acuroe.2022.06.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2021] [Accepted: 12/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of enhanced pharmaceutical recovery as postoperative standard care after radical cystectomy. METHODS A systematic literature search up to April 2021 was done and 33 studies included 6596 subjects submitted to surgery for radical cystectomy at the start of the study; 3143 of them received enhanced pharmaceutical recovery after surgery and 3453 were controls. The studies reported relationships about the effects of enhanced pharmaceutical recovery as postoperative standard care after radical cystectomy. We calculated the odds ratio (OR) and mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to assess the effects of enhanced pharmaceutical recovery as postoperative standard care after radical cystectomy using the dichotomous and continuous methods with a random or fixed-effect model. RESULTS Enhanced pharmaceutical recovery after surgery had significantly lower length of hospital stay (MD, -2.78; 95% CI, -3.59 to -1.97, p < 0.001), complications (OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.60-0.94, p = 0.01), readmission within 30 days (OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.69-0.94, p = 0.007), and time to defecation (MD, -1.30; 95% CI, -2.22 to -0.37, p = 0.006) compared to control in subjects submitted to radical cystectomy. CONCLUSIONS Enhanced pharmaceutical recovery after surgery may reduce the length of hospital stay, complications, readmission within 30 days, and time to first bowel movement compared to control in subjects with surgery for radical cystectomy. Furthers studies are required to validate these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W Ding
- Department of Urology, Jiangyan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Taizhou, Jiangsu, China
| | - R Ji
- Department of Urology, Linyi Third People's Hospital, Linyi, Shandong, China
| | - M E A Abdelrahim
- Clinical Pharmacy Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Beni-Suef University, Beni-Suef, Egypt
| | - L Wang
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Wuhan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Patel J, Tolppa T, Biccard BM, Fazzini B, Haniffa R, Marletta D, Moonesinghe R, Pearse R, Vengadasalam S, Stephens TJ, Vindrola-Padros C. Perioperative Care Pathways in Low- and Lower-Middle-Income Countries: Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis. World J Surg 2022; 46:2102-2113. [PMID: 35731268 PMCID: PMC9334384 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-022-06621-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Safe and effective care for surgical patients requires high-quality perioperative care. In high-income countries (HICs), care pathways have been shown to be effective in standardizing clinical practice to optimize patient outcomes. Little is known about their use in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) where perioperative mortality is substantially higher. METHODS Systematic review and narrative synthesis to identify and describe studies in peer-reviewed journals on the implementation or evaluation of perioperative care pathways in LMICs. Searches were conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL Plus, WHO Global Index, Web of Science, Scopus, Global Health and SciELO alongside citation searching. Descriptive statistics, taxonomy classifications and framework analyses were used to summarize the setting, outcome measures, implementation strategies, and facilitators and barriers to implementation. RESULTS Twenty-seven studies were included. The majority of pathways were set in tertiary hospitals in lower-middle-income countries and were focused on elective surgery. Only six studies were assessed as high quality. Most pathways were adapted from international guidance and had been implemented in a single hospital. The most commonly reported barriers to implementation were cost of interventions and lack of available resources. CONCLUSIONS Studies from a geographically diverse set of low and lower-middle-income countries demonstrate increasing use of perioperative pathways adapted to resource-poor settings, though there is sparsity of literature from low-income countries, first-level hospitals and emergency surgery. As in HICs, addressing patient and clinician beliefs is a major challenge in improving care. Context-relevant and patient-centered research, including qualitative and implementation studies, would make a valuable contribution to existing knowledge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jignesh Patel
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Centre for Perioperative Medicine, University College London, London, UK
| | - Timo Tolppa
- Network for Improving Critical Care Systems and Training, YMBA Building, Colombo, 08, Sri Lanka.,Mahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand
| | - Bruce M Biccard
- Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Groote Schuur Hospital and University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Brigitta Fazzini
- Adult Critical Care Unit, The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, Whitechapel, London, E1 1FR, UK
| | - Rashan Haniffa
- Network for Improving Critical Care Systems and Training, YMBA Building, Colombo, 08, Sri Lanka.,Mahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand
| | | | - Ramani Moonesinghe
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Centre for Perioperative Medicine, University College London, London, UK
| | - Rupert Pearse
- Critical Care and Perioperative Medicine Research Group, William Harvey Research Institute, c/o ACCU Research Team, Royal London Hospital, Queen Mary University of London, London, E1 1BB, UK
| | | | - Timothy J Stephens
- Critical Care and Perioperative Medicine Research Group, William Harvey Research Institute, c/o ACCU Research Team, Royal London Hospital, Queen Mary University of London, London, E1 1BB, UK.
| | - Cecilia Vindrola-Padros
- Division of Surgery, Department of Targeted Intervention, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ding W, Ji R, Abdelrahim M, Wang L. Metaanálisis sobre el protocolo de recuperación acelerada tras la cistectomía radical. Actas Urol Esp 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.acuro.2021.12.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
6
|
Peerbocus M, Wang ZJ. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery and Radical Cystectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Res Rep Urol 2021; 13:535-547. [PMID: 34350137 PMCID: PMC8328386 DOI: 10.2147/rru.s307385] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2021] [Accepted: 05/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols aim to optimize patient recovery after major surgery. Our study was to examine the evidence of the effectiveness of interventions designed to improve patient outcomes after radical cystectomy. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis. Data Sources PubMed, Medline, Embase, Cochrane from January 2005 to January 2021 without language restrictions. Eligibility Criteria Randomized and non-randomized controlled studies implementing ERAS measuring its interventions on rates of postoperative complications, 30-day readmission, length of stay (LOS) and bowel function after radical cystectomy. Data Extraction and Synthesis Two members of the investigating team independently selected studies and evaluated bias using the Cochrane collaboration tool. Meta-analysis of all comparative studies used inversed-weighted, fixed- effects models and random effects models to pool results. Publication bias was graphically assessed using contour-enhanced funnel plots and the Egger’s test of funnel plot symmetry. Results Fifteen studies were included in our meta-analysis; we observed that ERAS decreased the time for the first bowel movement (standardized mean difference [SMD]: –1.30, 95% CI −1.90 to −0.70, P<0.00001) and shortened the length of stay (LOS) ([SMD]: –0.49, 95% CI −0.77 to −0.20, (P < 0.00001)); however, 30-day readmission (risk ratio [RR]: 0.97,95% [CI] 0.73 to 1.28, P=0.52) and the overall postoperative complication rate (risk ratio [RR]: 0.98,95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.88 to 1.09, P= 0.41) showed no significant difference.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muaz Peerbocus
- Department of Urology, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, People's Republic of China
| | - Zeng-Jun Wang
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Nayak B, Garg H, Goel R, Singh P, Nayyar R, Kumar R, Seth A. Contemporary Outcomes of Open Radical Cystectomy: a 5-Year Experience from a Tertiary Care Center. Indian J Surg Oncol 2021; 12:86-93. [PMID: 33814837 DOI: 10.1007/s13193-020-01226-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2020] [Accepted: 09/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
To evaluate the perioperative outcomes of patients undergoing open radical cystectomy for carcinoma bladder in a tertiary care center. A retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database of all patients undergoing open radical cystectomy with a urinary diversion from July 2014 to August 2019 was done. A total of 195 patients were included. A total of 172 patients (88.2%) underwent radical cystectomy with ileal or sigmoid conduit, 6 patients underwent orthotopic neobladder, and 17 patients underwent cutaneous ureterostomy. The mean American Society of Anaesthesiology (ASA) score was 1.4. On preoperative histopathology, 125 patients had the muscle-invasive disease. The mean operative time (± SD) was 303.6 ± 53.4 min and the operative time was significantly longer for neobladder (p = 0.033). The mean blood loss (± SD) was 977.5 ± 346.5 ml. Among the complications, a total of 350 events occurred in 96 patients (49.3%). Thirty-nine patients (20%) suffered grade I complications, 12 patients (6.2%) suffered grade II complications, 26 patients (13.3%) suffered grade III complications, and 9 patients (4.6%) suffered grade IV complications. Grade III, IV, and V complications were considered major complications and 46 patients (23.5%) had major complications. Among the grade III complications, the majority included fascial dehiscence (burst abdomen), i.e., 13.3%, and uretero-ileal leak, i.e., 2.6%. The overall 30-day mortality rate was 5.2% (10/195). On multivariate analysis, the presence of diabetes mellitus (p = 0.047), operative time (p = 0.003), and low preoperative albumin (p = 0.009) were significant predictors for major preoperative complications. Diabetes mellitus, serum albumin, and operative time are significant predictors of postoperative complications. The ASA score, low preoperative hemoglobin, and blood loss are significant predictors of perioperative mortality. Though radical cystectomy has been associated with significant perioperative morbidity and mortality, the advancements in surgical techniques and intensive care tools have led to a significant decrease in morbidity and mortality in the contemporary era.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brusabhanu Nayak
- Department of Urology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, India
| | - Harshit Garg
- Department of Urology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, India
| | - Ritesh Goel
- Department of Urology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, India
| | - Prabhjot Singh
- Department of Urology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, India
| | - Rishi Nayyar
- Department of Urology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, India
| | - Rajeev Kumar
- Department of Urology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, India
| | - Amlesh Seth
- Department of Urology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Misra A, Mandal S, Das MK, Nayak P. Re: Bansal D, Nayak B, Singh P, Nayyar R, Ramachandran R, Kumar R, et al. Randomized controlled trial to compare outcomes with and without the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in patients undergoing radical cystectomy. Indian J Urol 2020;36:95-100. Indian J Urol 2020; 36:239-240. [PMID: 33082649 PMCID: PMC7531370 DOI: 10.4103/iju.iju_174_20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2020] [Accepted: 04/20/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Ankit Misra
- Department of Urology, AIIMS, Bhubaneshwar, Odisha, India
| | | | - Manoj K Das
- Department of Urology, AIIMS, Bhubaneshwar, Odisha, India
| | - Prasant Nayak
- Department of Urology, AIIMS, Bhubaneshwar, Odisha, India
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Bansal D, Nayak B, Singh P, Nayyar R, Ramachandran R, Kumar R, Seth A. Author Reply Re: Bansal D, Nayak B, Singh P, Nayyar R, Ramachandran R, Kumar R, Seth A. Randomized controlled trial to compare outcomes with and without the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in patients undergoing radical cystectomy. Indian J Urol 2020;36:95-100. Indian J Urol 2020; 36:240-241. [PMID: 33082650 PMCID: PMC7531364 DOI: 10.4103/iju.iju_195_20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2020] [Accepted: 04/20/2020] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Devanshu Bansal
- Department of Urology, Uro-Oncology and Renal Transplant, Max Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Brusabhanu Nayak
- Department of Urology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Prabhjot Singh
- Department of Urology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Rishi Nayyar
- Department of Urology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Rashmi Ramachandran
- Department of Anesthesiology, Pain Medicine and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Rajeev Kumar
- Department of Urology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Amlesh Seth
- Department of Urology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|