Utility of restage transurethral resection of bladder tumor

Metabolomic Signatures of Treatment Response in Bladder Cancer

Bladder cancer (BC) stands as one of the most prevalent urological malignancies, with over 500 thousand newly diagnosed cases annually. Treatment decisions in BC depend on factors like the risk of recurrence, the type of tumor, and the stage of the disease. While standard therapeutic approaches encompass transurethral resection of the bladder tumor, radical cystectomy, and chemo- or immunotherapy, these methods exhibit limited efficacy in mitigating the aggressive and recurrent nature of bladder tumors. To overcome this challenge, it is crucial to develop innovative methods for monitoring and predicting treatment responses among patients with BC. Metabolomics is gaining recognition as a promising approach for discovering biomarkers. It has the potential to reveal metabolic disruptions that precisely reflect how BC patients respond to particular treatments, providing a revolutionary method to improve accuracy in monitoring and predicting outcomes. In this article, we present a comprehensive review of studies employing metabolomics approaches to investigate the metabolic responses associated with different treatment modalities for BC. The review encompasses an exploration of various models, samples, and analytical techniques applied in this context. Special emphasis is placed on the reported changes in metabolite levels derived from these studies, highlighting their potential as biomarkers for personalized medicine in BC.

Does repeat transurethral resection of bladder tumor influence the diagnosis and prognosis of T1 bladder cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

To reduce recurrence or progression of tumor, NCCN guidelines recommend repeat transurethral resection of bladder tumors (reTURB) for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). The study aims to compare the impact of initial TURB and reTURB on the rate of residual or upstaging tumors and short-term and long-term survival outcomes of T1 bladder cancer (BC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We searched through several public database, including PubMed, Embase, Ovid Medline and Ovid EBM Reviews - Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. The latest search time was October 2021.

RESULTS

In general, 68 articles were involved. Short-term RFS (1-year and 3-year) of reTURB group was better compared with TURB group in T1 patients. The pooled RR were 1.10 (95%CI: 1.01-1.19) and 1.15 (95%CI: 1.03-1.28), respectively. While reTURB did not improve long-term RFS (5-year, 10-year, 15-year) in T1 patients. The pooled RR were 1.12 (95%CI: 0.97-1.30), 1.11 (95%CI: 0.82-1.50) and 1.37 (95%CI: 0.50-3.74), respectively. Analysis of PFS, OS and CSS demonstrated similar outcomes with RFS. We found that about two-thirds of samples contained detrusor. The residual tumor rate in stage T1 was 0.48 (95%CI: 0.42-0.53). While the rate of upstaging in stage T1 was 0.10 (95%CI: 0.07-0.13).

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, reTURB might provide short-term survival benefits for T1 BC, but it was not the same for long-term outcomes. The residual and upstaging rates of T1 BC in reTURB were around 50% and 10%, respectively. Our study might be conducive to clinically informed consents when patients expressed their concerns about the necessity of reTURB and its impact on diagnosis, treatment and prognosis.

When to Avoid a Restaging Procedure for Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer? Inferences from a Tertiary Care Center

The increasing incidence of urinary bladder carcinoma is alarming. Approximately seventy percent of these patients are non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). Restage transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) is the current recommendation for any T1 and or high-grade non muscle invasive bladder cancers (NMIBC) to accurately stage the malignancy. The question whether a second surgery is always required as a restage procedure is still unanswered. The patient's concern about completeness, morbidity, and financial considerations of a major surgery cannot be overlooked. Moreover, it also puts a strain on the already overburdened healthcare system. To answer this question, whether it is oncologically sound to omit a second resection, the current study evaluated the outcomes of patients undergoing restage TURBT, and analyzed the preoperative factors predicting a change in the staging of this malignancy. The study design was a prospective observational including NMIBC patients from September 2018 to February 2020. A total of 72 patients underwent restage TURBT. Their demographic data, imaging and cystoscopic findings, and histopathological data were recorded. The objective was to study the clinico-pathological correlations and factors predicting recurrence and upstaging of tumor in NMIBC patients undergoing restage TURBT. A total of 101 patients were found eligible for restage TURBT. Eventually, 72 underwent restage TURBT. Twelve (16.7%) patient had recurrence at restage while 3(4.16%) were upstaged to T2. Presence of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) was independently associated with the risk of recurrence of same stage compared to no recurrence (p-0.025, OR-8.793, 95% CI-1.316-98.773). Chemical exposure (p-0.042) was also significantly associated with the same. Presence of lymphadenopathy on CT was independently associated with the risk of upstaging compared to no recurrence (p-0.032, OR-18.25, 95% CI-1.292-257.85). The study concluded that in the presence of a well-performed and adequate initial TURBT, restage TURBT could be skipped for further management. However, in small subgroup of patients with lymphadenopathy on preoperative imaging having a higher risk of tumor recurrence and upstaging, and patients with a history of chemical exposure and previous lower urinary tract symptoms having a high risk of recurrence alone, restage TURBT should still be performed to accurately stage the disease. Further studies with large patient cohort are needed to confirm and reinforce the facts proposed.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13193-022-01516-8.

Role of magnetic resonance imaging in tumor staging and follow-up for bladder cancer

Urothelial carcinoma of the bladder is a common urologic malignancy. Complex factors, such as local stage, tumor grade, biologic potential, and various conditions, can affect the treatment strategy for bladder cancer. However, the local stage-in particular, the presence or absence of muscle invasion-significantly influences decisions regarding treatment strategy. The role of cystoscopy for screening, diagnosis, and transurethral resection cannot be overlooked. The importance of local staging with magnetic resonance imaging is increasing; magnetic resonance imaging of the bladder is considered a useful staging modality. Moreover, a radiologic reporting system for evaluating and scoring muscle invasion of bladder cancer was recently released. This system is based on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and is also expected to be feasible for post-treatment follow-up of bladder cancer. In this review, we discuss the role of magnetic resonance imaging in the local staging of urothelial carcinoma of the urinary bladder and post-treatment imaging. In addition, several technical aspects for obtaining appropriate quality magnetic resonance images of the bladder will be discussed.