1
|
Napolitano L, Maggi M, Sampogna G, Bianco M, Campetella M, Carilli M, Lucci Chiarissi M, Civitella A, DE Vita F, DI Maida F, DI Mauro M, Ercolino A, Fasulo V, Felici G, Gheza A, Guzzardo C, Loizzo D, Mazzone E, Parodi S, Piramide F, Rabito S, Rizzetto R, Romantini F, Scarcella S, Tedde M, Checcucci E, Esperto F, Claps F, Falagario U. A survey on preferences, attitudes, and perspectives of Italian urology trainees: implications of the novel national residency matching program. Minerva Urol Nephrol 2023; 75:718-728. [PMID: 37350584 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-6051.23.05257-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Since 2014, a new residency program selection process has been established with a national examination. The aim of this study was to assess characteristics, career goals, and practice preferences of current Italian urology residents. METHODS A web-based survey of 25 items performed from May 2021 to September 2021 was sent to 585 Italian urology residents. Descriptive analyses were conducted to describe the surveys' domains: demographics characteristics, studies, plans for fellowship training, interest in the urology field, and career expectations. RESULTS Four hundred and one residents completed the online survey (response rate 68.5%). Most residents were male (70.3%), with a median of 29 (IQR 28-31) years. Urology was the first chosen School in 325 (81.0%) cases, and 174 (43.4%) trainees have chosen to remain in the same University. Uro-oncology was the main field, and endourology the main subspeciality of interest, respectively. More than 40.0% of residents expressed a good level of satisfaction for the training urological course. 232 (57.2%) residents were strongly interested in seeking a hospital career, followed by private career (43.4%) and academic career (20%). CONCLUSIONS After the introduction of the novel national residency matching program the Italian Urology trainees showed a good satisfaction level. Further improvements of the Italian residency programs should be focused on the training network within and outside the main School of Urology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luigi Napolitano
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Martina Maggi
- Department of Urology, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy -
| | - Gianluca Sampogna
- Department of Urology, Foundation IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Marta Bianco
- Department of Urology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | | | - Marco Carilli
- Unit of Urology, Tor Vergata Polyclinic Foundation, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Angelo Civitella
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Campus Bio-Medico University, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Fabrizio DI Maida
- Unit of Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Careggi University Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Marina DI Mauro
- Section of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | | | - Vittorio Fasulo
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Graziano Felici
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Alberto Gheza
- Department of Urology, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | | | - Davide Loizzo
- Unit of Transplantation, Department of Urology, Andrology and Kidney, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Elio Mazzone
- Unit of Urology, Division of Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Parodi
- Department of Surgical and Diagnostic Integrated Sciences (DISC), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Federico Piramide
- Division of Urology, San Luigi Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Salvatore Rabito
- Department of Urology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Riccardo Rizzetto
- Department of Urology, AOUI Verona, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Federico Romantini
- Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | | | - Matteo Tedde
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Urologic Clinic, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy
| | - Enrico Checcucci
- Division of Urology, San Luigi Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Francesco Esperto
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Campus Bio-Medico University, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Claps
- Urology Clinic, Department of Medical, Surgical and Health Science, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Ugo Falagario
- Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, University of Foggia, Policlinico Riuniti, Foggia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Alasim HI, Arafa MA, Rabah DM, Alrawaf FK, Almanie AA, Alkhamshi AS, Almotairi AI. Factors influencing urology physicians in Saudi Arabia for choosing their subspecialty program. Urol Ann 2021; 12:335-340. [PMID: 33776329 PMCID: PMC7992524 DOI: 10.4103/ua.ua_9_20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2020] [Accepted: 04/06/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim: The aim of the study was to identify factors that influence urology physicians for choosing subspecialty and to know the most competitive urology subspecialty among residents. Methodology: An online questionnaire was sent to all Saudi Urology residents, registrars, and fellows all over Saudi Arabia, during February 2019–June 2019. The survey included demographic data, level and location of training, a subspecialty of interest, as well as 15 influencing factors that could affect physicians' choice in the form of Likert scale, ranging from strongly disagree = 0 to strongly agree = 4. Results: Of the 193 urology Saudi physicians, 85 replied (44.1%). Their mean age was 29 + 3.2 years. The majority of them were male (98.8%). There were 66 (77.6%) residents, 12 (14.1%) were fellows, and 7 (8.2%) were registrars. Four factors were found to be significantly different across positions, i.e., personal interest in the subspecialty, patient's prognosis, potential to join a private hospital, and family/friend advice. Among residents, the highest score means of the impact factors were the patient's prognosis, potential to join a private hospital and family/friend advice. The most prominent factors that influence urology physicians to select their subspecialty were personal interest in the specialty (88.2%), followed by the patient prognosis and lifestyle (84.7%, 78.8%). About 28.2% of the participants have a desire of endourology, followed by infertility and pediatric urology (23.5% and 20%, respectively). Conclusion: The most influencing factors among urology physicians for choosing their subspecialty are the patient's prognosis and personal interest. Female medical graduates should be encouraged to join a urology residency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haithm I Alasim
- Medical Intern, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Mostafa A Arafa
- Cancer Research Chair, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Danny M Rabah
- Cancer Research Chair, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.,Cancer Research Chair, Department of Urology, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Fahad K Alrawaf
- Medical Intern, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Abdulaziz A Almanie
- Medical Intern, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | | | | |
Collapse
|