1
|
Sharma AP, Kumar R, Chauhan R, Ziauddin SA, Singh S, Singh H, Devana SK, Gorsi U, Bora GS, Mavuduru RS, Kumar S, Mete UK, Mittal BR. Accuracy of combined multi-parametric MRI and PSMA PET-CT in diagnosing localized prostate cancer: newer horizons for a biopsy-free pathway. Eur J Hybrid Imaging 2023; 7:24. [PMID: 37945775 PMCID: PMC10635997 DOI: 10.1186/s41824-023-00182-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2023] [Accepted: 10/05/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is a reliable biomarker for identification of prostate cancer, although a biopsy is still the gold standard for detecting prostate cancer. Similar to higher PIRADS lesions on MRI, the maximal standard uptake value (SUV max) on PSMA PET is linked to a higher likelihood of prostate cancer. Can an mpMRI in conjunction with PSMA PET Scan accurately predict prostate cancer and further trigger omission of biopsy similar to other solid organ urological malignancies? METHODS Ga-68 PSMA PET and mpMRI were performed for each patient who was a part of this retrospective study. The PET-positive lesion's maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) was recorded. Prostate biopsies were performed on patients who had PSMA PET avid lesions and a PIRADS score of 4 or 5. Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) was afterward performed on patients who had cancer on their prostate biopsy. The prostatectomy specimen's histopathological information was recorded. Cutoff values and correlations between the variables were determined using the ROC curves and Pearson's correlation test. RESULT On the basis of suspicious DRE findings or elevated PSA, 70 men underwent mpMRI and PET scans. PIRADS 4 patients had a median (IQR) SUVmax of 8.75 (11.95); whereas, PIRADS 5 patients had an SUVmax of 24.5 (22). The mean SUVmax for patients whose biopsies revealed no cancer was 6.25 ± 1.41. With an AUC of 0.876 on the ROC curve, it was found that there was a significant positive correlation between the results of the mpMRI and PET scans and those of the histopathological investigation. A SUVmax ≥ 8.25 on PSMA PET for a PIRADS 4/5 lesion on mpMRI will aid in correctly predicting malignancy, with a sensitivity of 82.8% and specificity of 100%. CONCLUSION The findings of this study were positive and indicated that patients with a high suspicion of prostate cancer on mpMRI and PSMA PET (PIRADS ≥ 4 and SUVmax ≥ 8.25). This study substantiates the fact that a combination of mpMRI and PSMA PET can accurately predict localized prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aditya Prakash Sharma
- Department of Urology, Advance Urology Centre, PGIMER, Nehru Hospital, 160012, Chandigarh, India.
| | - Rajender Kumar
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India
| | - Rohit Chauhan
- Department of Urology, Advance Urology Centre, PGIMER, Nehru Hospital, 160012, Chandigarh, India
| | - Shiraz Akif Ziauddin
- Department of Urology, Advance Urology Centre, PGIMER, Nehru Hospital, 160012, Chandigarh, India
| | - Shanky Singh
- Department of Urology, Advance Urology Centre, PGIMER, Nehru Hospital, 160012, Chandigarh, India
| | | | - Sudheer Kumar Devana
- Department of Urology, Advance Urology Centre, PGIMER, Nehru Hospital, 160012, Chandigarh, India
| | - Ujjwal Gorsi
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India
| | - Girdhar Singh Bora
- Department of Urology, Advance Urology Centre, PGIMER, Nehru Hospital, 160012, Chandigarh, India
| | - Ravimohan S Mavuduru
- Department of Urology, Advance Urology Centre, PGIMER, Nehru Hospital, 160012, Chandigarh, India
| | - Santosh Kumar
- Department of Urology, Advance Urology Centre, PGIMER, Nehru Hospital, 160012, Chandigarh, India
| | - Uttam K Mete
- Department of Urology, Advance Urology Centre, PGIMER, Nehru Hospital, 160012, Chandigarh, India
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rao BV, Soni S, Kulkarni B, Bindhu MR, Ambekar A, Midha D, Kaushal S, Patil S, Jagdale R, Sundaram S, Kumar RM, Desai S, Menon S. Grossing and reporting of radical prostatectomy specimens: An evidence-based approach. Indian J Cancer 2023; 60:449-457. [PMID: 38155443 DOI: 10.4103/ijc.ijc_1550_21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2021] [Accepted: 09/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2023]
Abstract
Radical prostatectomy (RP) constitutes the primary treatment option for patients with clinically localized, biopsy-proven prostate cancer that requires local treatment with curative intent. Accurate reporting of radical prostatectomy specimens is required to guide further risk stratification and management of patients. Hence, for the handling and reporting of RP specimens, a standardized protocol should be followed. Many general pathologists may not be well-versed with the guidelines for the handling of radical prostatectomy specimens. This article discusses a detailed approach to grossing techniques, including specimen description, fixation requirements, gross cut-up, and reporting of the grade and stage of RP specimens. This will enable the pathologist to aid in multidisciplinary management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Vishal Rao
- Basavatarakam Indo American Cancer Hospital and Research Institute, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
| | - Shailesh Soni
- Muljibhai Patel Urological Hospital, Nadiad, Gujarat, India
| | - Bijal Kulkarni
- Kokilaben Dhirubhai Ambani Hospital and Research Centre, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - M R Bindhu
- Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Kochi, Kerala, India
| | | | - Divya Midha
- Tata Medical Centre Kolkata, West Bengal, India
| | | | - Sachin Patil
- Shri Siddhivinayak Ganapati Cancer Hospital, Miraj, Maharashtra, India
| | - Rakhi Jagdale
- Shri Siddhivinayak Ganapati Cancer Hospital, Miraj, Maharashtra, India
| | - Sandhya Sundaram
- Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| | | | - Sangeeta Desai
- Department of Pathology, Tata Medical Centre, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Santosh Menon
- Department of Pathology, Tata Medical Centre, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Li L, Xu Y, Xu Z, Qi F, Li X. Misclassification of Gleason grade and tumor stage in Asian‐American patients with low‐risk prostate cancer. PRECISION MEDICAL SCIENCES 2023. [DOI: 10.1002/prm2.12098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/11/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Lu Li
- Student of Nanjing Medical University Nanjing China
| | - Yihang Xu
- Student of The First Clinical Medical College of Nanjing Medical University Nanjing China
| | - Zicheng Xu
- Department of Urologic Surgery Jiangsu Cancer Hospital & Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research & Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University Nanjing China
| | - Feng Qi
- Department of Urologic Surgery Jiangsu Cancer Hospital & Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research & Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University Nanjing China
| | - Xiao Li
- Department of Urologic Surgery Jiangsu Cancer Hospital & Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research & Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University Nanjing China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sharma AP, Chaudhary K, Devana SK. Re; Singh S, Patil S, Tamhankar AS, Ahluwalia P, Gautam G. Low-risk prostate cancer in India: Is active surveillance a valid treatment option? Indian J Urol 2020;36:184-90. Indian J Urol 2020; 36:331-332. [PMID: 33376277 PMCID: PMC7759185 DOI: 10.4103/iju.iju_386_20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2020] [Accepted: 08/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Aditya P Sharma
- Department of Urology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Kapil Chaudhary
- Department of Urology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Sudheer K Devana
- Department of Urology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Singh S, Patil S, Tamhankar AS, Ahluwalia P, Gautam G. Author reply Re: Singh S, Patil S, Tamhankar AS, Ahluwalia P, Gautam G. Low-risk prostate cancer in India: Is active surveillance a valid treatment option? Indian J Urol 2020;36:184-90. Indian J Urol 2020; 36:333-334. [PMID: 33376279 PMCID: PMC7759179 DOI: 10.4103/iju.iju_436_20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2020] [Accepted: 08/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Shanky Singh
- Department of Uro-oncology, Max Institute of Cancer Care, New Delhi, India
| | - Saurabh Patil
- Department of Uro-oncology, Max Institute of Cancer Care, New Delhi, India
| | | | - Puneet Ahluwalia
- Department of Uro-oncology, Max Institute of Cancer Care, New Delhi, India
| | - Gagan Gautam
- Department of Uro-oncology, Max Institute of Cancer Care, New Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|