Arm Contouring After Massive Weight Loss: Liposuction-Assisted Brachioplasty Versus Standard Technique

[Postbariatric plastic surgery for body reconstruction]

Massive weight loss following bariatric surgery is often accompanied by functional impairments due to the resulting excess skin and soft tissues. To achieve both functional reconstruction and restoration of the body silhouette, it is imperative to undergo body contouring surgery involving the strategic transposition of tissues. Several surgical techniques are available for the affected body regions and their application for treatment is determined by the unique circumstances specific to each patient. When conducted by skilled practitioners, postbariatric body reconstruction can be executed safely, leading to outcomes that are both functionally and esthetically satisfying, ultimately contributing to an enhanced quality of life for patients. This article provides the fundamental principles for patient selection, surgical preparation, treatment planning, surgical techniques and the postoperative care following bariatric surgery.

Variable Energy and Ultrasound-based Liposculpture of the Arms: Multicenter and Multidevice Study

Incorporation of new technologies to assist the liposuction procedure is becoming increasingly common. These technologies allow for a softer technique, balanced shaping, elimination of excess adipose tissue, and skin tightening. Some of these technologies include ultrasound (US; US-assisted liposculpture, VASER-assisted liposuction), power suction (power-assisted liposuction), radiofrequency (RF; RF-assisted lipolysis), and laser (laser-assisted liposuction). In addition, some of these devices have been shown to reduce the incidence of hematomas/inflammation and shorten recovery time. We report our experience in high-definition liposculpture of the arms in addition to new technologies to improve skin retraction, comparing their results in terms of complications, satisfaction score, and aesthetic outcomes. We included patients with mild-to-moderate arm dermatochalasis (Duncan classification) fat deposits in the upper extremities who were considered candidates for third-generation US-assisted liposculpture, power-assisted liposuction, RF-assisted lipolysis/skin tightening, and laser-assisted liposuction. A total of 683 consecutive patients met the inclusion criteria for the study. Most of them were women (n = 605, 88%). Fat grafting was performed in 80 patients (11.7%). A significant portion of the patients were secondary cases (n = 223, 33%). Age ranged from 18 to 70 years (median = 38 years). BMI ranged from 17.8 to 34.8 kg/m2 (mean = 24.3 kg/m2). RF-assisted and laser-assisted high-definition liposculpture of the arms are both effective and reproducible techniques for patients who seek an athletic and slim arm contour. A low rate of complications and high satisfaction index support our findings.

Use of Radiofrequency-Assisted Liposuction (BodyTite) for Upper Arms Lifting

BACKGROUND

Body contouring surgery is increasingly requested by patients, both for aesthetic and post-bariatric purposes. There has also been a rapid increase in demand for noninvasive aesthetic treatments. While brachioplasty is burdened by numerous complications and unsatisfactory scars, and conventional liposuction is unsuitable for all patients, nonsurgical arm remodeling performed with radiofrequency-assisted liposuction (RFAL) allows to effectively treat most of patients, regardless of the amount of fat and ptosis of the skin and avoiding surgical excision.

METHODS

A prospective study was conducted on 120 consecutive patients who presented to the author's private clinic and required upper arm remodeling surgery for aesthetic purposes or after weight loss. Patients were classified according to the modified classification of El Khatib and Teimourian. Pre- and posttreatment upper arm circumferences were taken after 6 months of follow-up to assess the degree of skin retraction obtained by treating the arm with RFAL. A satisfaction questionnaire regarding the appearance of the arms (Body-Q upper arm satisfaction) was administered to all patients before surgery and after 6 months of follow-up.

RESULTS

All patients were effectively treated with RFAL, and no cases required conversion to brachioplasty. The average reduction in arm circumference was 3.75 cm at 6 months follow-up, and patients' satisfaction increased from 35 to 87% posttreatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Radio frequency is a valid tool to treat most patients with upper limbs skin laxity, with significant aesthetic results and a high degree of patient satisfaction, regardless of the degree of skin ptosis and lipodystrophy of the arm.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these evidence-based medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Adipose Tissue Transfer in Dynamic Definition Liposculpture PART III. The Arms: Biceps, Triceps, and Deltoids

Arm contouring usually represents a challenge for the surgeon due to zones with high risk of irregularities/asymmetries, the variable degree of skin laxity, and the differences between patient/gender preferences. In men, the bigger and muscular the arms the better, while women tend to prefer a slim and soft silhouette.

Methods

We performed arm cadaveric dissections and also searched our records for patients who underwent fat grafting of the arm in addition to HD2, from January 2016 to May 2022 at a single center in Bogotá, Colombia.

Results

Two hundred eighty-nine consecutive patients (275 men and 14 women) underwent high-definition lipoplasty/HD2 plus fat grafting of the biceps (72 muscles), the triceps (46 muscles), the deltoids (426 muscles), or a combination of them. Mean age was 39 and 36 years for men and women, respectively. Range of the fat graft volume was 30-150 ml. No major complications were reported. Follow-up period ranged from 2 to 24 months. Most patients were satisfied with the results.

Conclusions

Men usually seek an overall well-toned and muscular extremity, while women tend to prefer a slim but also athletic contour. Such outcomes can be achieved through intramuscular fat grafting of the biceps, triceps, and deltoids. The proper recognition of the pedicles and a precise surgical technique will ensure both its safety and the reproducibility of the results.

A Personal Approach to Brachioplasty

ABSTRACT

Brachioplasty has become one of the fastest-growing aesthetic surgery procedures, paralleling rising rates of weight loss surgery nationally. However, controversy persists regarding incision placement and utility of concurrent liposuction. In this article, the authors describe indications, patient selection, expected outcomes, and photographic standards for patients seeking brachioplasty after weight loss. Preoperative markings, scar placement, and operative steps of a posterior incision technique with or without concurrent liposuction if indicated are described. A personal experience with posterior incision brachioplasty along with current controversies, complications, and patient-reported outcomes after upper arm contouring are reviewed.

The use of Liposuction to treat significant contour abnormalities associated with Lipomyeloeningocoele

INTRODUCTION

Since 1972 when first pioneered, liposuction has developed and is now one of the commonest aesthetic procedures performed worldwide. Evidence of its application in aesthetic lipomodelling is widely known, but there are scant reports in the literature on the use of liposuction in more unusual cases. We report its use as a safe and successful method of contour correction in two cases of lipomyelomeningocoele (LMMC), a form of spina bifida. To our knowledge, this has never been reported before.

METHOD

A prospective review was performed and both cases were followed up during the treatment period. Both patients were treated at the Royal Belfast Hospital for Sick Children. Patient charts were reviewed and magnetic resonance imaging was used.

RESULTS

Two patients, aged 11 and 17 years, had a large LMMC over the lumbosacral area. Preoperative imaging was obtained in each case to ensure the procedure could safely avoid the underlying spinal cord structures. The use of the Microaire© suction device allowed precise fat extraction. Postoperative images demonstrate reduction of lipomatous bulk and improved contour.

CONCLUSION

We have shown that when used with caution liposuction is a safe and effective technique for volume reduction of a LMMC in carefully selected cases.

Complications in Brachioplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Brachioplasty procedures have experienced a surge in popularity over the past decade, mirroring the rise in bariatric procedures and growing population of massive weight loss patients. The authors estimated the incidence of associated complications and identify possible patient- or procedure-related predictive factors.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed using the PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases; extracted data were synthesized through a random-effects meta-analysis of proportions and a multivariate meta-regression.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine studies were included in the meta-analysis, representing 1578 patients; all studies followed an observational design. The incidence of adverse outcomes assessed included aberrant scarring, 9.9 percent (95 percent CI, 6.1 to 15.6 percent); ptosis or recurrence, 7.79 percent (95 percent CI, 4.8 to 12.35 percent); wound dehiscence, 6.81 percent (95 percent CI, 4.63 to 9.90 percent); seroma, 5.91 percent (95 percent CI, 3.75 to 9.25 percent); infection, 3.64 percent (95 percent CI, 2.38 to 5.53 percent); nerve-related complications, 2.47 percent (95 percent CI, 1.45 to 4.18 percent); lymphedema or lymphocele formation, 2.46 percent (95 percent CI, 1.55 to 3.88 percent); skin necrosis or delayed healing, 2.27 percent (95 percent CI, 1.37 to 3.74 percent); and hematoma, 2.06 percent (95 percent CI, 1.38 to 3.06 percent). The operative reintervention rate for aesthetic purposes was 7.46 percent (95 percent CI, 5.05 to 10.88 percent), and the operative reintervention rate for nonaesthetic purposes was 1.62 percent (95 percent CI, 1.00 to 2.61 percent). Multivariate meta-regression demonstrated that medial incision placement was associated with a higher risk of complications, whereas the incidence of certain complications was lowered with adjunctive liposuction (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

In the absence of large clinical trials, the present meta-analysis can serve to provide plastic surgeons with an evidence-based reference to improve informed consent and guide procedure selection with respect to the complication profile of brachioplasty.

Circumferential Lipobrachioplasty Is a Safe Procedure

BACKGROUND

Excess fat and skin in the upper arms have become troublesome with aging and especially after the advancement in methods of weight reduction. Arm contouring procedures can be divided into three groups: those dealing with skin redundancy, those dealing with the lipodystrophy, and a combination of both. This study tries to find an answer to the debate about the safety of simultaneous circumferential liposuction and brachioplasty.

METHODS

Sixty-two patients (49 women and 13 men) were operated on by simultaneous circumferential suction-assisted lipectomy followed by brachioplasty. Preoperative and postoperative arm circumferences and outcomes (including complications and patient satisfaction) were evaluated starting at least 6 months after the procedure.

RESULTS

Only two patients (3.2 percent) developed small areas of wound dehiscence that healed after repeated dressing and an extended period of compression garment use. One patient (1.6 percent) complained of hypertrophic scarring, which was managed by local compression and silicone sheets. The average reduction in mid arm circumference was 9 cm (range, 5 to 14 cm). Approximately 95.2 percent of the patients in the study are highly satisfied, and 4.8 percent reported a mild degree of satisfaction.

CONCLUSIONS

Simultaneous circumferential arm liposuction followed by brachioplasty addresses both the lipodystrophy and arm ptosis in a single hospital admission. This combination does not increase the complication rate. The results are highly satisfactory to the patients. According to the results of this study, circumferential arm lipobrachioplasty is considered to be a safe, efficient, reliable, and feasible procedure.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, IV.

[Concomitant breast surgery with a vertical latero-thoracic incision in continuity with a brachioplasty incision: About twelve (12) cases after massive weight loss]

INTRODUCTION

The need of iterative surgeries, the proximity of two anatomical areas, the combination of an aesthetic surgery with a surgery covered by health insurance are the reasons which motivated the authors to provide a simultaneous procedure on arms and breast in patients achieving massive weight loss. We propose a vertical continuation of the lateral mastopexy incision superiorly, in continuity with a simultaneous brachioplasty incision to treat the excess skin and subcutaneous tissue of the lateral chest wall, either by resection, or by increasing the breast with the patients own autologous tissue.

METHODS

Between 2010 and 2017, twelve patients aged between 31 and 56 years, with 42 being the average, have undergone a technique that utilises a vertical continuation of the lateral mastopexy incision superiorly, in continuity with a simultaneous brachioplasty incision: transverse skin incisions and free nipple transplantation for correction of extreme gynaecomastia (2 cases), mastopexy with resection of the excess tissue of the lateral chest wall (8 cases), autologous breast augmentation by the use of intercostal artery perforator flaps (2 cases). Mean body mass index (BMI) was 24kg/m² [23; 32] after average weight loss of 56kg [14; 112] following diet (3 cases) or bariatric surgery (9 cases).

RESULTS

Mean operative time was 4hours [3: 6], mean length of hospital stay was 4 days [2; 9]. We observed one major complication (hematoma) and one minor complication (wound dehiscence). At a mean follow-up of 21 months (ranged from 15 days to 84 months), the lateral flank scarring was well tolerated, with the additional benefit of reducing flank fullness.

CONCLUSION

The extended lateral flank scar allows reducing the excess skin and subcutaneous tissue of the lateral chest wall, while being easily concealable. This technique offers an elegant solution to this excess that used to persist after multistage surgeries.