Autologous Fat Graft for Soft Tissue Camouflage in Craniofacial Microsomia

Hemifacial microsomia: a scoping review on progressive facial asymmetry due to mandibular deformity

PURPOSE

This scoping review explores various parameters of the mandible in progressive facial asymmetry (FA) in hemifacial microsomia (HFM) patients, highlighting its relationship with sex, population, and age group.

METHODS

The review was based on a comprehensive search of PubMed, EBSCOhost, and Web of Science. Eligible studies that met the inclusion criteria form part of the selection study. The included studies were appraised using screening and quantitative criteria of mixed-method appraisal tools. The authors utilised a pre-set data extraction form to obtain information from the included studies.

RESULTS

Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria. The mandible parameters used were angular measurements, chin point, ramal height, body length, and total length. There was no relationship between FA and sex in HFM patients in the included studies. Most of the studies were comprised of European participants (55%), followed by Americans (36%) and Chinese (9%). The age groups included in the selected studies were categorised as dentition age (18%), early-to-middle childhood (18%), and varied ages (64%). The data presented in this review only pertains to the anomalous characteristics recorded on the affected side in HFM patients. No concomitant control data was recorded in this review.

CONCLUSION

An assessment of the included studies revealed that FA does not increase with age in HFM. Hence, FA is non-progressive in HFM patients. This information is relevant to diagnosing and managing HFM patients. More reports are needed on the progression of FA in HFM patients.

Quantifying outcomes of autologous fat transplantation in different facial deformities: A systemic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Autologous fat transplantation has become a common treatment for facial deformities. However, facial deformities are the result of complex diseases with different causes, and there has been no review on the effectiveness of autologous fat transplantation for facial deformities of different aetiologies.

METHODS

A systematic literature search of the Web of Science, Embase, and Medline Ovid databases was performed up to December 2022. Two investigators independently performed screening and data extraction according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis guidelines, followed by a meta-analysis using random-effects model for surgeon and patient satisfaction, facial symmetry, and complication rates. Twelve-month postoperative fat graft retention was estimated by meta-regression.

RESULTS

Thirty-one studies met the criteria, including 13 case series studies, 14 cohort studies, and four randomized clinical trials, with a total of 1572 patients. Follow-up visits within 6-12 months were performed in most of the studies. The results of the meta-analysis showed high overall surgeon satisfaction of 97% (95% CI: 92%-100%) and patient satisfaction of 95% (95% CI: 89%-99%), with a low complication rate of 3.4% (95% CI: 1.9%-5.9%). At 12 months postoperatively, a lower retention rate of 43% (95% CI: 28%-58%) was estimated in cases of acquired atrophic deformities compared with 64% (95% CI: 57%-71%) in cases of mixed deformities. Overall, autologous fat transplantation improved facial symmetry by 13% (95% CI: 8.4%-18%).

CONCLUSION

Autologous fat transplantation is generally a safe and effective procedure that can compensate for facial volume deficits and improve facial symmetry but may be less effective in cases of acquired atrophic facial deformities.

Longitudinal Skeletal Growth Analysis of Mandibular Asymmetry in Unoperated Patients With Unilateral Craniofacial Microsomia (UCFM)

PURPOSE

To examine the growth rate discrepancy of the affected and unaffected ramus heights in Pruzansky Type I and Type II mandibles.

METHODS

This is a serial retrospective longitudinal growth study of 30 untreated patients (21 males and 9 females) with UCMF (age range from 5 years to 14 years). The mean age of patients was 8.5 years, and the mean follow-up records were 3.7 years. There were 13 patients in group I with a Pruzansky Type I mandible and 17 patients in group II with a Pruzansky Type II. The unaffected side of the mandible served as a control. Eighteen cephalometric parameters were examined at each of the two-time intervals.

RESULTS

In patients with Pruzansky Type I mandible, the affected ramus grew on average 1.41 mm per year; the unaffected ramus grew 1.66 mm per year during the same period. In patients with Pruzansky Type II mandible, the affected ramus grew on average 0.84 mm per year; during the same period, unaffected ramus grew 1.79 per year. When the growth rate of the ramus height on the affected side was compared to the unaffected side, there was no statistically significant difference in Pruzansky Type I mandibles (p > .05); however, there was a statistically significant difference in the Pruzansky Type II mandibles (p < .05).

CONCLUSION

The growth rate discrepancy of the affected and unaffected ramus heights was more severe in Pruzansky Type II mandibles than Pruzansky Type I mandibles explaining the progressive nature of facial asymmetry in Pruzansky II mandibles.

A decade of clinical research on clinical characteristics, medical treatments, and surgical treatments for individuals with craniofacial microsomia: What have we learned?

AIM

This article provides a review of a decade of clinical research studies on clinical features, medical interventions, and surgical interventions for individuals with craniofacial microsomia (CFM). We also provide recommendations for future clinical research.

METHOD

A systematic search of literature was conducted in Embase and PubMed/MEDLINE Ovid. All publications from 2010 to 2020 that included at least 10 individuals with CFM were considered relevant for this study.

RESULTS

A total of 91 articles were included. In the past decade, many new studies on CFM have been published providing more insight on the diagnosis and management of patients with CFM. This review encompasses findings on the clinical difficulties patients with CFM encounter, including the craniofacial and extracraniofacial characteristics of patients with CFM and its related clinical consequences on breathing, feeding, speech, and hearing.

CONCLUSIONS

A considerable number of large multicenter studies have been published in recent years, providing new insights in the clinical consequences of CFM. The phenotypic variety between patients with CFM makes patient-specific treatment tailored to individual needs essential. The research and development of clinical care standards might be challenging because of the heterogeneity of CFM. Future research on clinical and patient-reported outcomes can help identify optimal treatment strategies. Cooperation between craniofacial centers, using uniform registration and outcome measurement tools, could enhance research and future care for these patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Secondary Treatment of Cleft Lip Correction Sequelae With Percutaneous Needleotomy, Autologous Fat Grafting, and Local Flaps: An Integrated Approach

INTRODUCTION

Cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P) is the most common congenital craniofacial malformation. The severity of the anatomic deformity is highly variable and different techniques can be employed depending on whether the defect is unilateral or bilateral, complete or incomplete. Patients usually undergo multiple steps of reconstruction throughout childhood and adolescence and, for this reason, secondary deformities of the nasolabial region of the midface may ensue. Considering our experience in the treatment of scars, we opted to correct the cleft lip surgery sequelae not only with local flaps/scar revisions, but we decided to add the use of the autologous fat grafting (AFG) to induce a regenerative effect in these young patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this study we present the results obtained from a series of 12 consecutive Caucasian patients aged from 23 to 44 years with widened paramedian lip scars secondary to cleft lip reconstruction surgery, treated with a combination of needle-induced lysis of the scar tissue and AFG from January 2013 to December 2018.

RESULTS

After the procedure we observed an overall improvement in the quality of the scar tissue, in the function of mimic features, in the symmetry and cosmetics of the lower third of the nose. Patients' satisfaction was excellent. Results were long lasting and remained virtually unchanged after 1 year of follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Scar release by needle, AFG and local flaps are excellent tools for the treatment of cleft lip correction sequelae, but the combination of these surgical techniques can lead to even better results.Level of Evidence: Level V.