Comparison of the effects of bosentan and sildenafil in the treatment of persistent pulmonary arterial hypertension in infants

Comparison of Different Treatments of Persistent Pulmonary Hypertension of the Newborn: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVES

Persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn (PPHN) is a life-threatening disease. Despite being considered the gold standard treatment scheme, inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) is not readily available in settings with limited resources. Therefore, in recent years, research on related drugs is being actively pursued. Herein, we aimed to use random-effects network meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and associated mortality of different PPHN therapies.

DATA SOURCES

We electronically searched the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library for data up to January 27, 2023.

STUDY SELECTION

Randomized controlled trials involving neonates with PPHN assessing efficacy and mortality of various treatments.

DATA EXTRACTION

Details of study population, treatments, and outcomes were extracted.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Direct pairwise comparisons and a network meta-analysis was performed under random effects. The ranking probability was further assessed based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA). We analyzed 23 randomized clinical trials involving 902 newborns with PPHN. Sixteen different treatment strategies were compared with each other and conventional therapy (CON). A median concentration of 10-20 parts per million (ppm) iNO (MNO) coupled with sildenafil orally administered at a dose of 1-3 mg/kg/dose every 6-8 hours (OSID) demonstrated the best efficacy (MNO + OSID vs. CON: odds ratio [OR] = 27.53, 95% CI, 2.36-321.75; SUCRA = 0.818, ranking first; moderate quality). OSID combined with milrinone administered IV also performed well in terms of efficacy (OSID + milrinone vs. CON: OR = 25.13, 95% CI = 1.67-377.78; SUCRA = 0.811, ranking second; low quality) and mortality reduction (CON vs. OSID + milrinone: OR = 25.13, 95% CI = 1.67-377.78; SUCRA = 0.786, ranking last; low quality).

CONCLUSIONS

MNO + OSID is the most effective PPHN treatment. If iNO is not available, OSID + milrinone is preferred.

Study on the comparison between Bosentan and Macitentan in the treatment of persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborns, simultaneously on sildenafil: A randomized double-blinded non-inferiority parallel clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Persistent Pulmonary Hypertension of the newborn (PPHN) is characterized by sustained elevated Pulmonary Artery Pressure (PAP). Drug resistance and the adverse effects of current therapeutic agents warrant investigation of other targeted therapies. Bosentan has shown benefits in affected neonates. However, trials reported the association with unwanted effects. Thus, in this study, we assess another agent in the same family, Macitentan. However, its efficacy in the treatment of PPHN is not yet reported. Hence, this study evaluated the effect of Macitentan compared to Bosentan in terms of efficacy and safety in the treatment of PPHN.

METHODS

This randomized, double-blinded non-inferiority clinical trial was conducted in Shahid Akbar Abadi hospital, Tehran, Iran. Sixty clinically stable neonates with signs suggestive of PPHN were randomly allocated into two groups (n = 30 in each group) and they received either Bosentan 1 mg/kg/dose BD (twice daily) or Macitentan 1 mg/kg/dose BD simultaneously with sildenafil. The echocardiographic and laboratory indices of efficacy and safety were compared between groups. SPAP (systolic pulmonary artery pressure) was used to assess the non-inferiority of the Macitentan compared to the Bosentan in their respective doses used in the study.

RESULTS

Participants' mean (SD) age was 3.53 (1.21) days, and 55% were female. No mortality case occurred. SPAP was reduced in both Bosentan and Macitenan groups with the mean difference in SPAP of 9 (95% CI: 7.34-10.65) in Bosentan and SPAP mean difference of 14 (95% CI: 12.12-15.86) in Macitentan group. Categorical comparison of primary outcome improvement showed that Macitentan was superior to Bosentan with a 10% non-inferiority margin. Similar results were obtained in other echocardiographic indices. Also, no significant alterations were observed in laboratory safety parameters.

CONCLUSION

Macitentan 1 mg/kg/dose BD (twice daily) is non-inferior to Bosentan 1 mg/kg/dose BD in improving echo outcomes of PPHN and it was even more effective in improving some of these. Also, it is non-inferior to Bosentan in terms of safety. TRIAL REGISTRY NUMBER: (IRCT20160120026115N9).

Bosentan in the treatment of persistent pulmonary hypertension in newborns: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn is a life-threatening condition that affects about 1-2 per 1,000 live births worldwide. Bosentan is an oral dual endothelin receptor antagonist that may have a beneficial effect on persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn by reducing pulmonary vascular resistance and improving oxygenation. However, its role in persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn remains unclear.

OBJECTIVES

To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of bosentan as an adjuvant therapy for persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn in newborns.

METHODS

We searched six English and two Chinese databases from their inception to 1 January 2023 following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We included randomised controlled trials and retrospective studies that compared bosentan with placebo or other drugs for persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn in newborns. We performed a meta-analysis using random-effects models and assessed the risk of bias and heterogeneity in the included studies.

RESULTS

We included 10 studies with a total of 550 participants. Bosentan significantly reduced the treatment failure rate (relative risk = 0.25, P < 0.001), pulmonary artery pressure (mean difference = -11.79, P < 0.001), and length of hospital stay (mean difference = -1.04, P = 0.003), and increased the partial pressure of oxygen (mean difference = 10.02, P < 0.001) and blood oxygen saturation (SpO2) (mean difference = 8.24, P < 0.001) compared with a placebo or other drugs. The occurrence of adverse reactions was not significantly different between bosentan and a placebo or other drugs.

CONCLUSIONS

Bosentan is effective in the treatment of persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn but adverse reactions such as abnormal liver function should be observed when using it.

Efficacy and safety of endothelin receptor antagonists, phosphodiesterase type 5 Inhibitors, and prostaglandins in pediatric pulmonary arterial hypertension: A network meta-analysis

Background

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a fatal disease characterized by pulmonary vascular remodeling and increased pulmonary artery pressure, leading to impaired lung oxygenation, right heart failure, and even death. Although great advances have been made in PAH-targeted medications for pediatric patients, the efficacy and safety of these treatments are controversial.

Methods

We retrieved relevant articles from electronic databases including PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library until 12 April 2022. To compare the effectiveness and safety of endothelin receptor antagonists (ERAs), phosphodiesterase type 5 Inhibitors (PDE-5i), and prostaglandins (ProA) in the treatment of pediatric PAH, we investigated six hemodynamic parameters, four respiratory parameters, intensive care unit (ICU) stay duration, length of hospital stay, and two safety outcomes.

Results

A total of 27 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in the meta-analysis with 1,574 pediatric participants. The duration of mechanical ventilation was shorter for patients using bosentan, sildenafil, and ProsA, compared with that for patients using the placebo. Bosentan helped to shorten more time for mechanical ventilation than ProsA did, while ProsA was more effective than sildenafil in this respect. As for the length of stay in the ICU, patients administered by ProsA or sildenafil needed shorter ICU stay, compared to those using the placebo, while ProsA was more effective for shortening ICU stay time. In light of safety outcomes, there was a statistically significant difference between the sildenafil and the placebo group. Sildenafil surpassed ProsA in reducing the incidence of pulmonary hypertension (PH) crisis.

Conclusions

ERAs were more effective than ProsA in shortening the duration of mechanical ventilation, while ProsA were better for shortening the duration of mechanical ventilation and ICU stay than PDE-5i. PDE-5i were found to generate more benefits in decreasing the occurrence of PH crisis, though further investigation is warranted.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=351505.

Efficacy and safety of bosentan in the treatment of persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn: a Metaanalysis

OBJECTIVES

To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of bosentan in the treatment of persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn (PPHN).

METHODS

Chinese Journal Full-text Database, Weipu Database, Wanfang Data, China Biology Medicine disc, PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched for literature on bosentan in the treatment of PPHN published up to August 31, 2021.

RESULTS

A total of 8 randomized controlled trials were included for Meta analysis. The results of the Meta analysis showed that compared with the control group, the bosentan treatment group had a significantly lower treatment failure rate (RR=0.23, P<0.001), a significantly greater reduction in pulmonary artery pressure [mean difference (MD)=-11.79, P<0.001)], significantly greater increases in oxygen partial pressure (MD=10.21, P=0.006) and blood oxygen saturation (MD=8.30, P<0.001), and a significantly shorter length of hospital stay (MD=-1.35, P<0.001). The descriptive analysis showed that the bosentan treatment group had a lower degree of tricuspid regurgitation than the control group after treatment. The main adverse reactions of bosentan treatment included abnormal liver function, anemia and edema. The results of subgroup analysis based on treatment regimen, research area, and drug dose were consistent with those before stratification.

CONCLUSIONS

Bosentan is effective in the treatment of PPHN. However, when using bosentan, attention should be paid to adverse reactions such as abnormal liver function.

New Pharmacologic Approaches to Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia

Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia is the most common long-term respiratory morbidity of preterm infants, with the risk of development proportional to the degree of prematurity. While its pathophysiologic and histologic features have changed over time as neonatal demographics and respiratory therapies have evolved, it is now thought to be characterized by impaired distal lung growth and abnormal pulmonary microvascular development. Though the exact sequence of events leading to the development of BPD has not been fully elucidated and likely varies among patients, it is thought to result from inflammatory and mechanical/oxidative injury from chronic ventilatory support in fragile, premature lungs susceptible to injury from surfactant deficiency, structural abnormalities, inadequate antioxidant defenses, and a chest wall that is more compliant than the lung. In addition, non-pulmonary issues may adversely affect lung development, including systemic infections and insufficient nutrition. Once BPD has developed, its management focuses on providing adequate gas exchange while promoting optimal lung growth. Pharmacologic strategies to ameliorate or prevent BPD continue to be investigated. A variety of agents, to be reviewed henceforth, have been developed or re-purposed to target different points in the pathways that lead to BPD, including anti-inflammatories, diuretics, steroids, pulmonary vasodilators, antioxidants, and a number of molecules involved in the cell signaling cascade thought to be involved in the pathogenesis of BPD.