Myoepithelial carcinoma of soft tissue: A report of two cases

Fine-needle aspiration cytology of retroperitoneal myoepithelial carcinoma: A rare encounter with diagnostic dilemmas

Myoepithelial carcinoma (MC) arises from the myoepithelial cells. It is a rare tumor with a predilection for salivary glands. MC in soft tissue is uncommon. Soft tissue MC exhibits dual epithelial and smooth muscle phenotype. The extremities and limb girdles are commonly affected. We present cytological findings of retroperitoneal MC with an accurate diagnosis being rendered with the aid of immunocytochemistry on the cell block and demonstration of EWSR1 rearrangements by fluorescence in situ hybridization on cytology smear. The smears were cellular, showing loose clusters and sheets of tumor cells embedded in dense eosinophilic to myxoid matrix material. The cells were oval to polygonal, with focal areas showing moderate nuclear pleomorphism, vesicular to coarse chromatin, and vacuolated cytoplasm with clearing. On immunocytochemistry, tumor cells were positive for epithelial membrane antigen, pan-cytokeratin, calponin, smooth muscle actin, and S-100. A literature review shows only a handful of cases of soft tissue MC. The current report emphasizes the need for cytomorphological awareness with the employment of ancillary testing for accurately diagnosing this rare tumor at an uncommon location. We also discuss the diagnostic challenges and troubleshooting.

Myoepithelial tumor in the popliteal area: A diagnostic dilemma

Introduction and importance

Myoepithelial tumors are under-recognized neoplasms that could be difficult to identify due to their rarity and limited comprehension. Their diverse morphology, varied cytologic features and heterogenous immunohistochemical characteristics create a significant diagnostic challenge.

Case presentation

We report the case of a 72-year-old-male patient who received conservative treatment during one year for a popliteal mass on the right knee that showed synovial hyperplasia (benign findings) at initial open tissue biopsy. New symptoms of popliteal area enlargement and discomfort required a second incisional biopsy to reach the diagnosis of a soft tissue myoepithelial tumor through tissue analysis and immunohistochemical staining.

Clinical discussion

The myoepithelial tumors represent a medical dilemma due to their heterogenic features requiring high level of suspicion and adequate immunohistochemical markers for their diagnosis.

Conclusion

Orthopaedic surgeons should be aware of the atypical presentation of these rare neoplasms to provide an early diagnosis and adequate management.

•

Consider myoepithelial tumor within the differential of a soft tissue mass.

•

Immunohistochemical markers are essential for diagnostic confirmation.

•

Surgical resection with negative margins remains the mainstay of treatment.

•

There is limited evidence regarding radiotherapy or chemotherapy effectiveness.

•

This case highlights the deceiving nature and an unusual location of a myoepithelial tumor.