Paediatric trauma aetiology, severity and outcome

A Retrospective Study Examining the Presentation and Management of Maxillofacial Soft Tissue Injuries Over 3 Years at a Regional Children's Hospital and the Introduction of a Maxillofacial Laceration Grading Scale

Pediatric trauma has been affected by COVID-19, school closures, and stay at home advice. Health seeking behavior has decreased. The aim of this study is to assess trends in the presentation of maxillofacial soft tissue injuries and subsequent management within a regional pediatric hospital. Retrospective study over a 3-year period (from 2019 to 2021 between the months of January and April). Inclusion of all pediatric patients seen by Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery team. Between 2019 and 2021, the total number of patients dropped by over half. The average age dropped from 5.9 in 2019 to 3.8 in 2021. Males were more commonly seen. Falls are the most common cause of injuries across 2019 to 2021. Extraoral injuries increased by 21%. Intraoral injuries reduced by 8%. Lip lacerations accounted for most injuries. In 2020, there was 21% reduction in conservative management of injuries. Wound closure under local anesthetic peaked in 2020, by 12%. Wound closure under general anesthetic has increased by 5%, and accounts for nearly a third of all injuries in 2020 and 2021. Patients are becoming younger and more likely to be male. Conservative management is most common but closure under local anesthetic and general anesthetic has increased. This may indicate an increase in the severity of soft tissue injuries or a trend toward operative management. We also introduce a laceration grading scale for clinician use to assist in assessing and documenting injury severity. Further research is needed to assess whether these trends continue or revert to prepandemic trends.

Failure to initiate trauma team activation for patients who meet the criteria in a level 1 paediatric trauma centre: which patients are missing out?

BACKGROUND

Trauma team activation (TTA) is paramount in the early hospital management of trauma patients. This study aimed to evaluate factors which contribute to failure to activate the Trauma team for management of paediatric trauma.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of Emergency Department (ED) presentations at the paediatric major trauma hospital in Adelaide, South Australia was conducted over a 16-month period. Data from the hospital's trauma registry, individual case files and digital medical records were evaluated to determine factors that were associated with no TTA.

RESULTS

During the study period, 617 trauma patients who met Level 1 or Level 2 TTA criteria attended the trauma centre. For 29 (4.7%) of these patients, there was no TTA. Predictors of no TTA included sustaining abdomen and/or pelvis injuries compared to limb injuries (unadjusted odds ratio [OR] = 10.59, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.98-56.69, P = 0.006), sustaining non-accidental injury (NAI) versus an injury with vehicle involvement (OR = 30.13, 95% CI 6.43-141.21, P < 0.001), and arriving via emergency medical retrieval service compared to private vehicle (OR = 14.23, 95% CI 3.94-51.36, P < 0.001). No patients transferred directly to Paediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU), or High Dependency Unit (HDU) received an appropriate TTA.

CONCLUSION

Multiple factors were associated with no TTA in paediatric trauma patients. The results highlight that even in PICU and HDU admissions and transfer patients, vigilant clarification of mechanism of injury and potential for occult injuries should be undertaken to ensure appropriate TTA and improve patient outcome.

Perception Towards COVID-19 Related Symptoms and Traditional Medicine Used for Their Management Among Patients and Their Attendants in Ethiopian Comprehensive Specialized Hospitals: A Cross-Sectional Study

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion