1
|
Hellings PW, Alobid I, Anselmo-Lima WT, Bernal-Sprekelsen M, Bjermer L, Caulley L, Chaker A, Constantinidis J, Conti DM, De Corso E, Desrosiers M, Diamant Z, Gevaert P, Han JK, Heffler E, Hopkins C, Landis BN, Lourenco O, Lund V, Luong AU, Mullol J, Peters A, Philpott C, Reitsma S, Ryan D, Scadding G, Senior B, Tomazic PV, Toskala E, Van Zele T, Viskens AS, Wagenmann M, Fokkens WJ. EUFOREA/EPOS2020 statement on the clinical considerations for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps care. Allergy 2024; 79:1123-1133. [PMID: 38108602 DOI: 10.1111/all.15982] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2023] [Revised: 11/18/2023] [Accepted: 12/01/2023] [Indexed: 12/19/2023]
Abstract
Following the European Forum for Research and Education in Allergy and Airway Diseases (EUFOREA) treatment algorithm for chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), patients suffering from severe uncontrolled CRSwNP are recommended to receive oral corticosteroids, (revision) sinus surgery, systemic biologicals and/or aspirin treatment after desensitization (ATAD). Given the major differences in indications, outcomes, practical considerations, risks and costs of these key pillars of treatment, there is a growing need to define criteria for each treatment option and list the clinically relevant and major considerations for them. This EUFOREA document therefore provides an expert panel overview of the expected outcomes, specific considerations and (contra)indications of the five major treatment arms of severe uncontrolled CRSwNP: oral corticosteroids, primary and revision sinus surgery, biological treatment and ATAD. This overview of treatment considerations is needed to allow physicians and patients to consider the different options in the context of providing optimal and personalized care for severe uncontrolled CRSwNP. In conclusion, the five major treatment options for severe uncontrolled CRSwNP have intrinsic advantages, specific indications and considerations that are of importance to the patient, the physician and the society. This EUFOREA statement supports the unmet need to define criteria for the indication of every treatment pillar of CRSwNP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter W Hellings
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Allergy and Clinical Immunology Research unit, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Clinical Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Upper airways research laboratory, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Isam Alobid
- Rhinology and Skull Base Unit, ENT Department, Hospital Clínic, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Clinical and Experimental Respiratory Immunoallergy, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi I Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
- Center of Biomedical Research in Respiratory Diseases (CIBERES), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Wilma T Anselmo-Lima
- Division of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Ophthalmology, Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ribeirao Preto Medical School-University of Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Manuel Bernal-Sprekelsen
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Hospital Clinic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Leif Bjermer
- Department of Respiratory Medicine & Allergology, Institute for Clinical Science, Skane University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Lisa Caulley
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Institut for Klinisk Medicin, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Adam Chaker
- Dept. of Otorhinolaryngology and Center for Allergy and Environment (ZAUM), TUM School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jannis Constantinidis
- 1st Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Medical School, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Diego M Conti
- The European Forum for Research and Education in Allergy and Airway Diseases Scientific Expert Team Members, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Eugenio De Corso
- Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Rhinology, A. Gemelli University Hospital Foundation, IRCSS, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Zuzana Diamant
- Department of Respiratory Medicine & Allergology, Institute for Clinical Science, Skane University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Department of Microbiology Immunology & Transplantation, KU Leuven, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Thomayer Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy & Pharmacology, University in Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Philippe Gevaert
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Upper airways research laboratory, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Joseph K Han
- Department of Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Virginia, USA
| | - Enrico Heffler
- Personalized Medicine, Asthma and Allergy-IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy
| | - Claire Hopkins
- Ear, Nose and Throat Department, Guys and St. Thomas Hospital, London, UK
| | - Basile N Landis
- Rhinology-Olfactology Unit, Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Olga Lourenco
- FCS-UBI, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Beira Interior, Covilhã, Portugal
- CICS-UBI, Health Sciences Research Centre, University of Beira Interior, Covilhã, Portugal
| | - Valerie Lund
- Royal National Ear, Nose and Eastman Dental Hospital, London, UK
| | - Amber U Luong
- Otolaryngology-HNS, McGovern Medical School of the University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Joaquim Mullol
- Rhinology Unit and Smell Clinic, ENT Department, Hospital Clínic, FRCB-IDIBAPS, Universitat de Barcelona, CIBERES, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Anju Peters
- Division of Allergy and Immunology and Northwestern Sinus Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Carl Philpott
- Rhinology & ENT Research Group, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
- Norfolk & Waveney ENT Service, James Paget and Norfolk & Norwich University Hospitals, Norfolk, UK
| | - Sietze Reitsma
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dermot Ryan
- Allergy and Respiratory Research Group, Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Glenis Scadding
- Royal National ENT Hospital, London and Division of Immunity and Infection, University College, London, UK
| | - Brent Senior
- Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Peter Valentin Tomazic
- Department of General Otorhinolaryngology, H&N Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Elina Toskala
- Otolaryngology-HNS, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Thibaut Van Zele
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Upper airways research laboratory, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - An-Sofie Viskens
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Allergy and Clinical Immunology Research unit, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Martin Wagenmann
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Dusseldorf, Germany
| | - W J Fokkens
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lima C, Falcão MAP, Pinto FJ, Bernardo JTG, Lopes-Ferreira M. The Anti-Inflammatory Peptide TnP Is a Candidate Molecule for Asthma Treatment. Cells 2023; 12:924. [PMID: 36980265 PMCID: PMC10047759 DOI: 10.3390/cells12060924] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2023] [Revised: 03/10/2023] [Accepted: 03/13/2023] [Indexed: 03/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Asthma is the most common chronic lung disease, with increasing morbidity and mortality worldwide. Accumulation of peribronchial leukocytes is the hallmark of asthma, in particular, eosinophils, which have been reported as the primary cell associated with the induction of airway hyperresponsiveness. Continued exacerbation and accumulation of other leukocytes, such as neutrophils, Th1, and Th17 cells correlate with many of the long-term effects of asthma, such as airway remodeling. We have patented the TnP family of synthetic cyclic peptides, which is in the preclinical phase of developmental studies for chronic inflammatory diseases. The aim of this work was to investigate whether TnP could show anti-inflammatory activity in a murine model of asthma that includes a mixed phenotype of eosinophilic and neutrophilic inflammation. For this, Balb/c mice, sensitized with OVA and exposed to 1% challenge with OVA aerosol, were submitted to prophylactic treatment, receiving TnP at 0.3 mg/kg orally, 1 h before each challenge. We found that sensitized mice challenged with OVA and treated with TnP showed no airway hyperreactivity or lung remodeling. TnP acts systemically in secondary lymphoid organs and locally in the lung, inhibiting the production of Th2/Th17 cytokines. Furthermore, TnP prevented the infiltration of eosinophils and neutrophils in the BAL and lung tissue, inhibited the production of IgE/IgG1, prevented hyperplasia of mucus-producing cells, and decreased the thickening and deposition of sub-epithelial collagen. Our results showed TnP as a candidate molecule for the treatment of airway remodeling associated with inflammatory diseases, such as asthma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carla Lima
- Immunoregulation Unit, Laboratory of Applied Toxinology (CeTICs/FAPESP), Butantan Institute, São Paulo 05503900, Brazil; (M.A.P.F.); (F.J.P.); (J.T.G.B.); (M.L.-F.)
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kameda S, Sasabuchi Y, Michihata N, Yamana H, Matsui H, Fushimi K, Yasunaga H, Kohro T. Prednisolone versus cyclosporine as initial treatment for Kawasaki disease. Pediatr Int 2023; 65:e15658. [PMID: 37804040 DOI: 10.1111/ped.15658] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2023] [Revised: 08/15/2023] [Accepted: 08/18/2023] [Indexed: 10/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several studies have demonstrated the efficacy of prednisolone and cyclosporine as initial combination treatments for the prevention of coronary artery abnormalities (CAA) in patients with Kawasaki disease. However, whether prednisolone or cyclosporine results in superior clinical outcomes is unknown. Thus, this study aimed to compare the outcomes of these two treatments. METHODS Using the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination database, we identified patients with Kawasaki disease who had received prednisolone or cyclosporine in addition to initial intravenous immunoglobulin treatment between April 2014 and March 2021. The primary outcome was the proportion of CAA; secondary outcomes included intravenous immunoglobulin resistance, medical costs, and length of hospital stay. Propensity score matching was conducted to compare outcomes between the two groups. RESULTS We identified 6288 patients with Kawasaki disease who had received prednisolone (n = 6147) or cyclosporine (n = 141) as an initial treatment in combination with intravenous immunoglobulin. Four-to-one propensity score-matched analysis demonstrated no significant difference in the proportion of CAA (0.7% vs. 2.8%; p = 0.098), intravenous immunoglobulin resistance, or medical costs between the treatment groups. The length of hospital stay was significantly longer in the prednisolone group (14 vs. 11 days, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Prednisolone and cyclosporine used in the initial combination treatment for Kawasaki disease showed similar clinical outcomes regarding the risk of CAA, intravenous immunoglobulin resistance, and medical costs, whereas the length of hospital stay was longer in the prednisolone group than in the cyclosporine group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Satoko Kameda
- Data Science Center, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke, Japan
| | - Yusuke Sasabuchi
- Data Science Center, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke, Japan
- Department of Real-world Evidence, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Nobuaki Michihata
- Department of Health Services Research, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hayato Yamana
- Data Science Center, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke, Japan
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Health Economics, School of Public Health, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroki Matsui
- Data Science Center, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke, Japan
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Health Economics, School of Public Health, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kiyohide Fushimi
- Department of Health Policy and Informatics, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hideo Yasunaga
- Data Science Center, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke, Japan
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Health Economics, School of Public Health, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takahide Kohro
- Data Science Center, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Dahan E, El Ghazal N, Nakanishi H, El Haddad J, Matar RH, Tosovic D, Beran A, Than CA, Stiasny D. Dexamethasone versus prednisone/prednisolone in the management of pediatric patients with acute asthmatic exacerbations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Asthma 2022:1-12. [PMID: 36461938 DOI: 10.1080/02770903.2022.2155189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/05/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Acute asthmatic exacerbation is a common condition for pediatric emergency visits. Recently, dexamethasone has increasingly been used as an alternative to prednisone. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of dexamethasone (DEX) against prednisone/prednisolone (PRED) in managing pediatric patients with acute asthmatic exacerbation. DATA SOURCES Cochrane, Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched for articles from their inception to August 2022 by two independent reviewers using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) system. The review was registered prospectively with PROSPERO (CRD42022353462). STUDY SELECTIONS From 316 studies screened, seventeen studies met the eligibility criteria, with 5967 pediatric patients experiencing an asthma exacerbation requiring treatment with either DEX (n = 2865) or PRED (n = 3102). Baseline patient characteristics (age, sex, PRAM (pediatric respiratory assessment measure), previous corticosteroid and beta-agonist inhaler) were comparable between groups. RESULTS After treatment administration, the DEX group had fewer vomiting incidents (OR = 0.24, 95% CI: 0.11, 0.51, I2 = 58%) and reduced noncompliance events (OR = 0.12, 95% CI: 0.04, 0.34, I2 = 0%) when compared to the PRED group. Regarding emergency-department (ED)-related outcomes, there were no differences in hospital admission rates (OR = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.58, 1.19, I2 = 15%), time spent in the ED (MD= -0.11 h, 95% CI: -0.52; 0.30, I2 = 82%) or relapse occurrences (OR = 0.67, 95% CI: 0.30, 1.49, I2 = 52%) between both groups. CONCLUSION Although there were no differences between the DEX and PRED groups in terms of hospital admission rates, time spent in the ED or relapse events, pediatric patients receiving DEX experienced lower noncompliance and vomiting rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elise Dahan
- St George's University of London, London, UK.,University of Nicosia Medical School, University of Nicosia, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Nour El Ghazal
- St George's University of London, London, UK.,University of Nicosia Medical School, University of Nicosia, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Hayato Nakanishi
- St George's University of London, London, UK.,University of Nicosia Medical School, University of Nicosia, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Joe El Haddad
- St George's University of London, London, UK.,University of Nicosia Medical School, University of Nicosia, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Reem H Matar
- St George's University of London, London, UK.,University of Nicosia Medical School, University of Nicosia, Nicosia, Cyprus.,Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Danijel Tosovic
- School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Australia
| | - Azizullah Beran
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Christian A Than
- St George's University of London, London, UK.,University of Nicosia Medical School, University of Nicosia, Nicosia, Cyprus.,School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Australia
| | - David Stiasny
- Pediatrics Department Swedish Medical Group, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|