The effect of blended training on the quality of life of children with nephrotic syndrome

Effects of family centered nursing model on children with primary nephrotic syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Family-centered nursing model has been widely used in the care of children patients, but there is still a lack of research on the care of children with primary nephrotic syndrome (PNS). Therefore, the aim of this study was to comprehensively evaluate the effects of family-centered nursing on children with PNS.

METHODS

The electronic databases included China National Knowledge Internet, Wanfang Data Knowledge Service Platform, VIP, PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase, were searched to collect randomized controlled trials on family-centered nursing model in the treatment of children with PNS. Fixed effect models or fixed effect models were used to analyze the outcomes. The primary outcomes were length of hospital stay and nursing satisfaction, and the second outcomes were quality of life (QoL) and behavioral problems.

RESULTS

A total of 12 studies involving 996 pediatric patients were included, of which 500 children received family centered care and 496 children received routine care. The results showed that family centered nursing model could significantly improve the QoL of children with PNS (P < .05), increase the nursing satisfaction of family members (P < .0001, SMD = 7.37, 95%CI = 4.15-13.08), reduce the time of hospitalization (P < .0001, standard mean difference [SMD] = -2.30, 95%CI = -2.57 to -2.03), and decrease the scores of psychosomatic disorders and impulsivity hyperactivity in children with PNS (P < .0001, SMD = -3.13, 95%CI = -4.12 to -2.15; P < .0001, SMD = -3.29, 95%CI = -4.29 to -2.28). However, there was no significant statistical difference in the impact on the scores of conduct problems, learning problems, anxiety, and hyperactivity (P > .05).

CONCLUSION

Family-centered nursing model can improve the QoL of children with PNS, increase the nursing satisfaction of family members and reduce the length of hospital stay, but further research need to verify its impact on behavioral problems.

Reliability of generic quality-of-life instruments in assessing health-related quality of life among children and adolescents with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Most of the studies reporting the negative impact of idiopathic nephrotic syndrome on health-related quality of life in children and adolescents were conducted with generic quality-of-life instruments rather than disease-specific instruments. The consistency of these studies' findings using these generic instruments is not well established.

AIM

This systematic review aims to determine the reliability of current generic quality-of-life instruments in assessing health-related quality of life among children and adolescents with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome.

METHODS

We searched the PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Google Scholar databases for articles published between 2000 and 2020, using appropriate descriptors. We included primary studies that met the eligibility criteria, independently screened their titles and abstracts, and removed all duplicates during the study-selection process. We resolved disagreements until a consensus was reached on study selection. We independently retrieved relevant data, including the generic quality-of-life instruments and the subjects' and controls' aggregate health-related quality of life scores, using a preconceived data-extraction form.

RESULTS

Ten original articles were selected for qualitative and quantitative analyses. Some of the studies reported the following significant findings. The mean health-related quality of life scores for children with prevalent and incident nephrotic syndrome were 68.6 (range, 52.6-84.6) and 73.7 (range, 55.9-91.5), respectively. Children with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome and their controls with other chronic diseases had median scores of 65 (interquartile range, 59-68.75) and 62.2 (interquartile range, 58.05-65.78). Patients on oral immunosuppressive drug and intravenous rituximab reportedly had median scores of 76.2 and 72.6 and mean scores of 71.4 (range, 55.4-87.4) and 61.6 (range, 42.1-81.1) respectively for quality-of-life assessment on the 'school functioning domain.'

CONCLUSIONS

The health-related quality of life scores in patients with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome are consistently low. Lower scores occur in prolonged disease duration and severe clinical phenotypes, whereas the scores are higher than the scores obtained in other chronic diseases. These consistent findings underscore the reliability of the current generic instruments in assessing health-related quality of life in patients with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome.