Levels and determinants of knowledge about chronic migraine diagnosis and management among primary health-care physicians in ministry of health, Jeddah 2019

Healthcare resource use and costs associated with the misdiagnosis of migraine

OBJECTIVE

To compare healthcare resource utilization and healthcare costs in patients with migraine with or without a history of misdiagnosis.

BACKGROUND

Despite the high prevalence of migraine, migraine is commonly misdiagnosed. The healthcare resource use and cost burden of a misdiagnosis is unknown.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study identified adults with an incident migraine diagnosis from the Merative™ Marketscan® Commercial and Medicare Supplemental Databases between June 2018 and 2019. Patients with a diagnosis of commonly considered misdiagnoses (headache, sinusitis, or cervical pain) before their migraine diagnosis were classified as the "misdiagnosed cohort." Patients in the misdiagnosed cohort were potentially misdiagnosed, then eventually received a correct diagnosis. Patients without a history of commonly considered misdiagnoses prior to their migraine diagnosis were classified as the "correctly diagnosed cohort." Healthcare resource utilization and healthcare costs were assessed in the period before migraine diagnosis and compared between the cohorts. Outcomes were reported as per patient per month and compared with incidence rate ratios.

RESULTS

A total of 29,147 patients comprised the correctly diagnosed cohort and 3841 patients comprised the misdiagnosed cohort and met the inclusion criteria. Patients in the misdiagnosed cohort had statistically significantly higher rates of inpatient admissions (0.02 vs. 0.01, incidence rate ratio [IRR] 1.61, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.47-1.74), emergency department visits (0.10 vs. 0.05; IRR 1.89, 95% CI 1.79-1.99), neurologist visits (0.12 vs. 0.02; IRR 5.95, 95% CI 5.40-6.57), non-neurologist outpatient visits (2.64 vs. 1.58; IRR 1.67, 95% CI 1.62-1.72) and prescription fills (2.82 vs. 1.84; IRR 1.53, 95% CI 1.48-1.58) compared to correctly diagnosed patients. Misdiagnosed patients had statistically significantly higher rates of healthcare cost accrual for inpatient admissions ($1362 vs. $518; IRR 2.62, 95% CI 2.50-2.75), emergency department visits ($222 vs. $98; IRR 2.27, 95% CI 2.18-2.36), neurologist visits ($42 vs. $9; IRR 4.39, 95% CI 4.00-4.79), non-neurologist outpatient visits ($1327 vs. $641; IRR 2.07, 95% CI 1.91-2.24), and prescription fills ($305 vs. $215; IRR 1.41, 95% CI 1.18-1.70) compared to correctly diagnosed patients.

CONCLUSION

Patients with migraine who have a history of misdiagnoses have higher rates of healthcare resource utilization and cost accrual versus those without such history.

A Literature Review of the Educational Gaps and Needs in Migraine Management: An Asian Perspective Within a Global Context

Migraine is a common neurological disorder that presents considerable challenges to healthcare systems worldwide. These changes are especially relevant in rapidly developing regions such as Asia, with an increasingly productive population and ongoing advancements in healthcare systems and infrastructure. Despite its substantial impact, migraine management remains inadequate, potentially due to deficiencies in medical education. We hypothesized that significant gaps in basic and advanced medical training and continuing professional education contribute to the suboptimal management of migraine in various healthcare settings across Asia. A comprehensive literature review was conducted using PubMed and Google databases. The search focused on cross-sectional studies published in English from inception until September 2024 that examined educational needs among medical trainees and clinicians and clinical gaps in migraine management in Asia. These studies were then contextualized within a global perspective. The review identified significant shortcomings in migraine education at all levels of educational training in Asia, which also translated to poor management of migraines in clinical practice. Undergraduate medical curricula in Asia inadequately address headache disorders, while postgraduate training programs provide insufficient guidance in headache management, especially for complex cases. Primary care clinicians exhibited variable levels of understanding and frequently incorrectly diagnosed and managed migraine. Additionally, many Asian countries lack standardized clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) and specialized training programs for headache management. A multidimensional approach is required to tackle the pre-existing educational and clinical practice limitations. The approach should include improving the medical school curriculum, providing focused continuing medical education programs or developing migraine modules for primary care physicians (PCPs), and developing region-specific CPGs. Besides educational initiatives, integrating and coordinating systems of care, where primary and specialist services complement each other, are crucial for improving patient care. Robust education combined with comprehensive referral and linkage protocols ensures continuity of care across healthcare levels. Moreover, collaboration, communication, and cooperation among healthcare providers (HCPs) and organizations are vital to enhancing the quality of life and productivity of migraine patients in the region. A synergistic approach that combines robust collaboration with innovative educational delivery can catalyze the widespread adoption of evidence-based medicine (EBM).

Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of migraine management among primary health care physicians in Al-Madinah Al-Munawarah

Migraine is a burdensome primary headache disorder with a global prevalence ranging from 15-18%. Our study aimed to assess the knowledge among primary healthcare physicians regarding migraine and evaluate whether their management practices align with current advances. This descriptive cross-sectional study included 212 primary healthcare physicians working in Al-Madinah Al-Munawarah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Data were collected using a self-administered, validated questionnaire distributed at clinics, with participant consent, to ensure privacy. A total of 212 responses were collected, the majority were from men (53.8%) and participants less than 30 years old (43.9%). Most participants held a Bachelor of Medicine, Bachelor of Surgery (MBBS) qualification (general practitioners), accounting for 56.1% of the sample. The results revealed that 83.5% had a high level of knowledge about the diagnostic criteria for migraine. Factors associated with a higher level of knowledge were female gender and age group less than 30 years. However, most participants (62.3%) were not familiar with the new acute and preventive migraine treatments. The findings of this study indicate good knowledge, attitude, and practicing habits among our participants. However, there were clear deficiencies in understanding the latest advancements in migraine treatment. We recommend implementing continuous education programs regarding the advances in migraine treatment among primary care physicians in Al-Madinah Al-Munawarah.

Understanding migraine in Saudi society: An assessment of public knowledge and attitudes: A cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to assess the knowledge and perceptions of the public toward migraine in Saudi Arabia.

METHODS

This cross-sectional survey assessed the knowledge and perceptions of migraine among Saudi Arabian individuals. The study was conducted over three months in 2023 (1st of June 2023 to 31st of August 2023) using a prevalidated online questionnaire divided into four sections.

RESULTS

A total of 1,975 adults aged between 18 and 64 completed the web-based survey. Of these, over half were male (n = 1,268; 64.2%). The main causes of migraine identified by the participants were genetic disease (n = 540, 27.3%), followed by physical disease (n = 341, 17.3%), head trauma (n = 274, 13.9%), and psychiatric disease (n = 157, 7.9%). The main symptoms identified by the participants were photophobia (21%), followed by inability to control urine (14.1%), vomiting and nausea (13.8%), and vision loss (8.3%). The majority of the participants in this study had a good knowledge of migraines, while 49% had poor knowledge. The migraine knowledge score was significantly associated with the participants' gender (p = 0.002), age (p = 0.0001), educational level (p = 0.001), employment status (p = 0.001), monthly income (p = 0.0001), region (p = 0.0001), and history of migraine (p = 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Although one-third of the participants exhibiting good knowledge, deficiencies existed in certain clinical aspects, emphasizing the need for targeted educational interventions to enhance public awareness and understanding of migraines.

Problem of headache: A cross-sectional study

Objectives

To assess the medical students, interns, general practitioners, and family physicians' perception of neurological and otolaryngeal causes of headaches.

Materials and Methods

A prospective, qualitative, questionnaire-based cross-sectional study took place. Five hundred and seventy-one senior medical students, interns, general practitioners (GPs), and family physicians from different geographical regions in Saudi Arabia were involved in the study. An online questionnaire is used to estimate the respondents' knowledge regarding neurological and otolaryngeal causes of headaches. The obtained data were statistically analyzed using SPSS version 21.

Results

Five hundred and seventy-one participants were involved in the study. They were 377 females and 194 males with a female-to-male ratio of 1.9:1. Most of them were medical students (69.9%). However, medical interns, general practitioners, and family physicians' respondents were (17.3%), (7.5%), and (5.3%), respectively. They constituted different geographical regions of Saudi Arabia. An average level of knowledge about headaches was recorded in (55%) of the participants, while (42.7%) had a good level of knowledge about its etiologies.

Conclusions

A considerable percentage of the current study population has average knowledge about neurological and otolaryngeal factors of headache. It is advocated that the current national medical curriculum be thoroughly reviewed and clear referral pathways must be established to have better management of these cases.

Prevalence of Migraine Headache in Saudi Arabia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Migraine is an important healthcare concern that silently affects diverse populations globally. The rising prevalence of migraine affects the quality of life of individuals, the economic burden of a nation, and work productivity. This study was designed to determine the prevalence of migraine in Saudi Arabia.

METHODOLOGY

A systematic data search was designed, and scientific data were collected from leading databases, including PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Ovid, and Google Scholar.

RESULTS

Thirty-six studies, comprising 55061 study participants based on defined inclusion criteria, were statistically analyzed using StatsDirect software. The pooled proportion of migraine in Saudi Arabia among all 36 selected studies was 0.225617 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.172749 to 0.28326). The study was grouped into four categories: general population, students (of both genders), studies based on females only, and healthcare professionals in primary health care (PHC). The migraine pooled proportion among all four groups using random effects (DerSimonian-Laird) was 0.213822 (95% CI = 0.142888 to 0.294523), 0.205943 (95% CI = 0.127752 to 0.297076), 0.345967 (95% CI = 0.135996 to 0.593799), and 0.167068 (95% CI = 0.096429 to 0.252075), respectively.

CONCLUSION

The estimated pooled proportion of migraine in Saudi Arabia is 0.225617, which is comparable to or even higher than other parts of the Middle East region. Migraine has a great impact on quality of life, productivity, and economic capacity, and increases the healthcare burden. Early detection and necessary lifestyle measures are necessary to minimize this number.

Migraine in physicians and final year medical students: A cross-sectional insight into prevalence, self-awareness, and knowledge from Pakistan

BACKGROUND

Despite its high prevalence, migraine remains underdiagnosed worldwide. A significant reason is the knowledge gap in physicians regarding diagnostic criteria, clinical features, and other clinical aspects of migraine.

AIM

To measure the knowledge deficit in physicians and medical students and to assess the prevalence of migraine in the same population.

METHODS

An online questionnaire was developed and distributed among physicians and final year medical students on duty in various medical and surgical specialties of Allied and DHQ Hospitals, Faisalabad, between October 2018 and October 2019. Inclusion criteria were public practicing physicians who experience headaches, while those who never experienced headaches were excluded. Different questions assessed respondents on their knowledge of triggers, diagnosis, management, and prophylaxis of the migraine headache. They were asked to diagnose themselves using embedded ICHD-3 diagnostic criteria for different types of migraine. Graphs, tables, and figures were made using Microsoft Office 2016 and Microsoft Visio, and data analysis was done in R Studio 1.4.

RESULTS

We had 213 respondents and 175 fulfilled inclusion criteria, with 99 (52%), 58 (30%) and 12 (6.3%) belonging to specialties of medicine, surgery, and others, respectively. Both genders were symmetrically represented (88 male and 87 female). Fifty-two (24.4%) of our 213 respondents were diagnosed with migraine, with 26 (50%) being aware of it. Females had higher prevalence among study participants (n = 28, 32.2%) compared to males (n = 20, 22.7%, P = 0.19). A majority (62%) of subjects never consulted any doctor for their headache. Similarly, a majority (62%) either never heard or did not remember the diagnostic criteria of migraine. Around 38% falsely believed that having any type of aura is essential for diagnosing migraine. The consultation rate was 37% (n = 65), and migraineurs were significantly more likely to have consulted a doctor, and a neurologist in particular (P < 0.001). Consulters and migraineurs fared better in the knowledge of diagnostic aspects of the disease than their counterparts. There was no significant difference in other knowledge aspects between consulters versus non-consulters and migraineurs versus non-migraineurs.

CONCLUSION

Critical knowledge gaps exist between physicians and medical students, potentially contributing to misdiagnosis and mismanagement of migraine.

Clinical effect of flunarizine combined with duloxetine in the treatment of chronic migraine comorbidity of depression and anxiety disorder

BACKGROUND

Migraine is common in primary headaches, and with the development of social economy and the increase in living pressure, the prevalence of migraine has an upward trend.

OBJECTIVE

To observe the clinical effect of flunarizine combined with duloxetine in the treatment of chronic migraine with comorbid depression and anxiety disorders and to provide a reference for clinical treatment.

METHODS

A total of 118 patients with chronic migraine complicated with depression and anxiety disorder admitted to our hospital from June 2018 to August 2020 were selected and divided into two groups according to treatment methods, 59 cases in each group. The control group was treated with flunarizine combined with loxoprofen sodium, and the observation group was treated with flunarizine combined with duloxetine. The changes of electroneurophysiological indexes, tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin-6 (IL-6), high sensitivity-C reactive protein (hs-CRP), Hamilton depression scale (HAMD) score, and Hamilton anxiety scale (HAMA) score before and after treatment in the two groups were recorded, and the total effective rate of clinical treatment in the two groups was counted.

RESULTS

After treatment, TNF-α, IL-6, and hs-CRP in the two groups decreased gradually (p < .05). Further comparison between groups showed that TNF-α, IL-6, and hs-CRP in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (p < .05). After treatment, the HAMD score and the HAMA score of the two groups decreased gradually (p < .05). Further comparison between the two groups showed that HAMD score and HAMA score of the observation group were lower than those of the control group (p < .05).

CONCLUSION

Flunarizine combined with duloxetine in the treatment of chronic migraine with depression and anxiety disorder can effectively improve neuroelectrophysiological indexes, reduce inflammation, and reduce depression and anxiety.

Practical Insights on the Identification and Management of Patients with Chronic Migraine

Chronic migraine (CM) is one of the most disabling diseases, and it is commonly misdiagnosed and mistreated. Despite the importance of a timely and accurate diagnosis for the effective management of CM, recent surveys have shown that only 20–25% of individuals with CM receive a correct diagnosis. The obvious consequences of misdiagnosed CM are prolongation of symptoms and their associated effects on disability and health-related quality of life. Additionally, mistreatment of CM can lead to acute medication overuse headache with escalation of headache and end organ damage. Ideally, a diagnosis of CM should be made in the primary care setting, based on a thorough medical history including detailed descriptions of headaches occurring earlier in life as well as current headaches, and the range of headaches (not just the worst headaches). In our experience, it is often equally informative to ask the patient about the number of headache-free days (HFDs) and no accompanying symptoms (i.e., crystal-clear days) to quantify headache days and accurately estimate headache frequency/impact. Headache frequency is important, as this count is one key means of diagnosing CM, which requires ≥ 15 headache days/month, noting that these do not need to be migraine days. A headache day is defined as more than 4 h a day of headache. Comorbidities are common in CM and may affect the treatment choice and increase disability. Every CM patient should be offered a preventive migraine treatment. In this commentary, we provide practical insights and tips for diagnosing CM and cover issues of medication overuse, patient communication, diagnostic testing, and when to make a referral. Our key message to physicians for a patient who comes to the clinic with frequent disabling headaches having features of migraine is to assume CM until proven otherwise.

Dilemma of migraine diagnosis and management among non-neurologists

Background

Migraine is a common and debilitating disorder however there is a wide gap in its diagnosis and management. Many migraine patients present to non-neurologists, so it is of utmost importance that non neurologists become well oriented with the diagnostic criteria and different lines of management. The aim of the study was to assess the knowledge and attitude of non-neurologists towards migraine.

Results

About 45% of physicians in our study refer migraine patients to non-neurologists, only 20.96% are aware of both classic and novel treatments, 43% had poor knowledge of migraine symptoms and management, 32.34% recommended using medical tailored programs to increase the awareness of non-neurologists regarding migraine.

Conclusions

There is a wide gap of knowledge concerning migraine among non-neurologists.