A clinical comparative study using anchorage from mini-implants and conventional anchorage methods to retract anterior teeth

A comparative study on anterior teeth retraction-related hard and soft tissue changes with physiologic anchorage control technique

Aim of this comparative cross-sectional study was to evaluate the effect of anterior teeth retraction and related hard and soft tissue change under physiologic anchorage control in patients with chief complain of protrusive teeth. 68 Class I or II orthodontic patients undergoing four-premolar extraction and requiring maximum or medium anchorage were included. Patients were treated with physiologic anchorage control technique (PASS group, n = 34, 18.6 ± 7.7 years, 10 male and 24 female) and self-ligation technique (Damon group, n = 34, 17.5 ± 5.4 years, 13 male and 21 female), respectively. TADs were used for anchorage reinforcement in Damon group. Pre- and post-treatment cephalograms were collected. Twenty-six skeletal, dental and soft tissue items were measured and analyzed using a blinded method. T test and paired rank-sum test were used for statistical analysis. The baseline characteristics were similar between groups (P > 0.05). After treatment, inter-group comparison showed statistically significant differences in the decrease of skeletal measurements ∠ANB (- 0.73 ± 1.05° in PASS group and - 0.25 ± 0.84° in the Damon group), Wits value (- 2.56 ± 2.29 mm in PASS group and - 0.47 ± 2.15 mm in Damon group) and soft tissue measurement UL-E (- 2.75 ± 1.36 mm in PASS group and - 2.03 ± 1.30 mm in Damon group) and the increase of FCA and Z angle, which was 2.03 ± 2.12°and 9.52 ± 4.78°in PASS group and 0.97 ± 2.12°and 6.96 ± 4.43°in Damon group, respectively (P < 0.05). Our results indicated that significant anterior teeth retraction and profile improvement could be achieved with PASS technique without additional anchorage devices. Appropriate application of physiologic anchorage control could reduce the dependence of TADs for anterior teeth retraction.

Dentoalveolar and Soft Tissue Changes Following en-Masse Anterior Retraction With Different Force Vectors in Subjects With Bidental Protrusion: A Retrospective Evaluation

Introduction The aim of the study is to determine the effects of different vertical force vectors acting on dentoalveolar and soft tissues while applying a retraction force using various anchorage sources and their effects on these tissues. Material and methods Based on the selection criteria, a total of 35 patient case records with Angle's Class I bidental malocclusion and incompetent lips treated with four premolar extractions were included. Retraction was achieved using a NiTi coil spring with two different force vectors. The anchorage in group 1 was enhanced by a transpalatal arch (TPA) and Lower Stabilizing Arch (LSA) in the upper and lower arch, respectively, with a force vector parallel to the occlusal plane, whereas in group 2, the force vector using Temporary Anchorage Devices (TADs) was 15 - 20 degrees to the occlusal plane. The skeletal, dental, and soft tissue were obtained using 40 parameters. Intra-group comparisons between pre- and post-treatment records were conducted using a paired t-test, while inter-group comparisons were conducted using an independent t-test. Result Significant anchor loss was observed in group 1, indicated by mesial movement of molar crowns by (-2.10±0.50) in the maxillary arch and (-1.75±0.38) in the mandibular arch. Distal movement of incisors following premolar extractions with both studied force vectors resulted in an improvement in lip procumbency and incisor inclinations, without any significant skeletal changes. Molar mesial movement was observed in subjects treated with conventional anchorage. Conclusion En masse anterior retraction did lead to anchorage loss when carried out without TADs. Altering the force vector did not produce significant changes in tooth movement along the vertical plane.