Evolution and Utility of Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Monogenic Disorders in Assisted Reproduction - A Narrative Review

Prenatal and preimplantation testing for monogenic kidney disorders

In recent years, advances in genetic sequencing techniques and the analysis of sequencing data have significantly improved our ability to diagnose genetic kidney diseases. Identification of the disease-causing genetic variant(s) is crucial not only for prognostication and personalized management, but also for providing genetic counseling and guiding family planning decisions. It is particularly important that patients desiring children receive advice on their reproductive choices early, ideally before conception. This concise review focuses on the options available for prenatal and preimplantation genetic testing in the context of monogenic kidney diseases, including the latest progress and the legal and ethical issues associated with these reproductive technologies. Although these tests could be performed for all monogenic disorders where the disease-causing variant(s) has (have) been identified in the index patient, invasive prenatal testing is currently primarily performed for severe childhood-onset monogenic kidney disorders. Noninvasive prenatal diagnosis for monogenic disorders is a rapidly developing field that promises to provide an accurate and acceptable alternative to invasive procedures once several technical challenges have been addressed. Preimplantation genetic testing allows for the selection and implantation of embryos free from the disease-causing genetic variants, significantly lowering the risk of affected pregnancies. This option is becoming more popular among individuals with monogenic kidney diseases, particularly those with disorders that manifest later in life, such as autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. This review covers the procedure, its outcomes, and the technical, ethical and legal challenges of preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic kidney diseases.

Molecular autopsy by proxy: relevance for genetic counseling in rare genetic disorders

Background

Rare genetic disorders may result in death before a definitive clinical diagnosis is established.

Aim

This study aims to outline the processes and challenges in managing, from a genetic perspective, couples who lost children affected by rare genetic disorders.

Results

Six couples who experienced child loss due to rare genetic disorders, seen by the primary author at genetic evaluation and counseling sessions, were retrospectively analyzed. Four out of 6 couples reported consanguinity. Exome and genome sequencing were performed for the parents. Carrier status of two rare lethal metabolic disorders was confirmed in one consanguineous couple. Three couples were carriers of 3 other rare diseases. Variants of LYST, MPV17, HEXB, ITGB4, CD3E, ASPM, TK2, COL11A2, and LAMB3 genes were identified. Six out of 10 were pathogenic variants, out of which 4 correlated with the demised children's phenotypes. One couple was negative for pathogenic variants. The last couple did not undergo genetic testing since they were beyond the fertile window.

Conclusion

Appropriate parental genetic evaluation and counseling are mandatory for selecting the right genetic test to certify the diagnosis postmortem, by virtue of molecular autopsy by proxy. Clarifying a rare disorder diagnosis can help couples to avoid recurrence and plan early for their next pregnancies.

Advancements and Applications of Preimplantation Genetic Testing in In Vitro Fertilization: A Comprehensive Review

Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) has become an integral component of assisted reproductive technology (ART), offering couples the opportunity to screen embryos for genetic abnormalities before implantation during in vitro fertilization (IVF). This comprehensive review explores the advancements and applications of PGT in IVF, covering its various types, technological developments, clinical applications, efficacy, challenges, regulatory aspects, and future directions. The evolution of PGT techniques, including next-generation sequencing (NGS) and comparative genomic hybridization (CGH), has significantly enhanced the accuracy and reliability of genetic testing in embryos. PGT holds profound implications for the future of ART by improving IVF success rates, reducing the incidence of genetic disorders, and mitigating the emotional and financial burdens associated with failed pregnancies and genetic diseases. Recommendations for clinicians, researchers, and policymakers include staying updated on the latest PGT techniques and guidelines, exploring innovative technologies, establishing clear regulatory frameworks, and fostering collaboration to maximize the potential benefits of PGT in assisted reproduction. Overall, this review provides valuable insights into the current state of PGT and its implications for the field of reproductive medicine.

Preimplantation genetic testing for embryos predisposed to hereditary cancer: Possibilities and challenges

Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT), which was developed as an alternative to prenatal genetic testing, allows couples to avoid pregnancies with abnormal chromosomes and the subsequent termination of the affected fetus. Originally used for early onset monogenic conditions, PGT is now used to prevent various types of inherited cancer conditions based on the development of PGT technology, assisted reproductive techniques (ARTs), and in vitro fertilization (IVF). This review provides insights into the potential benefits and challenges associated with the application of PGT for hereditary cancer and provides an overview of the existing literature on this test, with a particular focus on the current challenges related to laws, ethics, counseling, and technology. Additionally, this review predicts the future potential applications of this method. Although PGT may be utilized to predict and prevent hereditary cancer, each case should be comprehensively evaluated. The motives of couples must be assessed to prevent the misuse of this technique for eugenic purposes, and non-pathogenic phenotypes must be carefully evaluated. Pathological cases that require this technology should also be carefully considered based on legal and ethical reasoning. PGT may be the preferred treatment for hereditary cancer cases; however, such cases require careful case-by-case evaluations. Therefore, this study concludes that multidisciplinary counseling and support for patients and their families are essential to ensure that PGT is a viable option that meets all legal and ethical concerns.

Genetic counseling for pre-implantation genetic testing of monogenic disorders (PGT-M)

Pre-implantation genetic testing (PGT) is a vital tool in preventing chromosomal aneuploidies and other genetic disorders including those that are monogenic in origin. It is performed on embryos created by intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Genetic counseling in the area of assisted reproductive technology (ART) has also evolved along with PGT and is considered an essential and integral part of Reproductive Medicine. While PGT has the potential to prevent future progeny from being affected by genetic conditions, genetic counseling helps couples understand and adapt to the medical, psychological, familial and social implications of the genetic contribution to disease. Genetic counseling is particularly helpful for couples with recurrent miscarriages, advanced maternal age, a partner with a chromosome translocation or inversion, those in a consanguineous marriage, and those using donor gametes. Partners with a family history of genetic conditions including hereditary cancer, late onset neurological diseases and with a carrier status for monogenic disorders can benefit from genetic counseling when undergoing PGT for monogenic disorders (PGT-M). Genetic counseling for PGT is useful in cases of Mendelian disorders, autosomal dominant and recessive conditions and sex chromosome linked disorders and for the purposes of utilizing HLA matching technology for creating a savior sibling. It also helps in understanding the importance of PGT in cases of variants of uncertain significance (VUS) and variable penetrance. The possibilities and limitations are discussed in detail during the sessions of genetic counseling.

Comparing the advantages, disadvantages and diagnostic power of different non-invasive pre-implantation genetic testing: A literature review

To improve embryo transfer success and increase the chances of live birth in assisted reproductive methods, there is a growing demand for the use of pre-implantation genetic testing (PGT). However, the invasive approaches used in PGT have led to in vitrofertilization failure and abortions, increasing anxiety levels for parents. To address this, non-invasive PGT methods have been introduced, such as the detection of DNA in blastocoel fluid of blastocysts and spent culture media (SCM). These methods have proven to be minimally invasive and effective in detecting aneuploidy in the chromosomes of human embryos. This review aims to explore the different approaches to pre-implantation diagnosis, including invasive and non-invasive methods, with a particular focus on non-invasive PGT (niPGT). The search strategy involved gathering data from scientific databases such as PubMed, Google Scholar, and Science Direct using relevant keywords. The search was conducted until January 2023. In total, 22 studies have successfully reported the detection and amplification of cell-free DNA in the embryonic SCM. It is important to note that niPGT has some limitations, which include differences in indicators such as cell-free DNA amplification rate, concordance, level of maternal DNA contamination, sensitivity, and specificity between SCM samples and biopsied cells. Therefore, more extensive and detailed research is needed to fully understand niPGT's potential for clinical applications.

The management of congenital adrenal hyperplasia during preconception, pregnancy, and postpartum

Congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH) is a group of autosomal recessive disorders of steroidogenesis of the adrenal cortex, most commonly due to 21-hydroxylase deficiency caused by mutations in the CYP21A2 gene. Although women with CAH have decreased fecundity, they are able to conceive; thus, if pregnancy is not desired, contraception options should be offered. If fertility is desired, women with classic CAH should first optimize glucocorticoid treatment, followed by ovulation induction medications and gonadotropins if needed. Due to the possible pregnancy complications and implications on the offspring, preconception genetic testing and counseling with a high-risk obstetrics specialist is recommended. For couples trying to avoid having a child with CAH, care with a reproductive endocrinology and infertility specialist to utilize in vitro fertilization can be offered, with or without preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders. Prenatal screening and diagnosis options during pregnancy include maternal serum cell free-DNA for sex of the baby, and chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis for diagnosis of CAH. Pregnant women with classic CAH need glucocorticoids to be adjusted during the pregnancy, at the time of delivery, and postpartum, and should be monitored for adrenal crisis. Maternal and fetal risks may include chorioamnionitis, maternal hypertension, gestational diabetes, cesarean section, and small for gestational age infants. This review on CAH due to 21-hydroxylase deficiency highlights reproductive health including genetic transmission, contraception options, glucocorticoid management, fertility treatments, as well as testing, antenatal monitoring, and management during pregnancy, delivery, and postpartum.

Ichthyosis

The ichthyoses are a large, heterogeneous group of skin cornification disorders. They can be inherited or acquired, and result in defective keratinocyte differentiation and abnormal epidermal barrier formation. The resultant skin barrier dysfunction leads to increased transepidermal water loss and inflammation. Disordered cornification is clinically characterized by skin scaling with various degrees of thickening, desquamation (peeling) and erythema (redness). Regardless of the type of ichthyosis, many patients suffer from itching, recurrent infections, sweating impairment (hypohidrosis) with heat intolerance, and diverse ocular, hearing and nutritional complications that should be monitored periodically. The characteristic clinical features are considered to be a homeostatic attempt to repair the skin barrier, but heterogeneous clinical presentation and imperfect phenotype-genotype correlation hinder diagnosis. An accurate molecular diagnosis is, however, crucial for predicting prognosis and providing appropriate genetic counselling. Most ichthyoses severely affect patient quality of life and, in severe forms, may cause considerable disability and even death. So far, treatment provides only symptomatic relief. It is lifelong, expensive, time-consuming, and often provides disappointing results. A better understanding of the molecular mechanisms that underlie these conditions is essential for designing pathogenesis-driven and patient-tailored innovative therapeutic solutions.