A Scanning Electron Microscope Evaluation of Smear Layer Removal and Antimicrobial Action of Mixture of Tetracycline, Acid and Detergent, Sodium Hypochlorite, Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid, and Chlorhexidine Gluconate: An In vitro Study

Characterization, Antimicrobial Activity, and Antioxidant Efficacy of a Pomegranate Peel Solution Against Persistent Root Canal Pathogens

BACKGROUND

The limitations of dental irrigation solutions reinforce the need to explore novel bioactive compounds that are safer and biodegradable. This study aimed to prepare a 10% pomegranate peel solution (Punica granatum extract - PGE) and evaluate its antimicrobial and antioxidant effects for root canal treatment.

METHODS

Lyophilized extracts (1g/10 mL) from pomegranate peels were prepared, and the punicalagin content was assessed by ultra-performance liquid chromatography using pure punicalagin (standard). The antimicrobial activity was tested against common persistent root canal pathogens by the agar diffusion method, minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), and minimum bactericidal/fungicide concentration (MCB/MFC). The antioxidant activity (%AA) was assessed by the DPPH radical scavenging method. Data were analyzed by ANOVA and Tukey's test (α = 0.05).

RESULTS

The total phenolic content of the PGEextract was 6.55 µg/mL. Differences were found among the inhibition zone of PGE (23.32 ± 3.65), 1% NaOCl (30.76 ± 4.73), and 50% ethanol (without inhibition) (p < 0.05). The MIC values of PGE ranged between 6.25 and 75 mg/ml, and PGE was effective against the tested pathogens. PGE had antioxidant potential (IC50 = 3.52 µg/mL); however, the mean values were inferior to that of the quercetin (positive control) (IC50 = 0.95 µg/mL). The DPPH scavenging effect (%AA) of PGE (70.98 ± 2.3) had no difference from the positive control (72.94 ± 2.1) (p = 0.253).

CONCLUSION

The PGE extract was successfully biosynthesized and exhibited antimicrobial and antioxidant activity, suggesting its potential use as an adjuvant therapy during root canal treatment.

A comparative evaluation of smear layer removal by using ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid, citric acid, and maleic acid as root canal irrigants: An in vitro scanning electron microscopic study

Introduction:

Irrigants remove or dissolve smear layer formed during instrumentation. Thus it is important to study the effect of different irrigant solutions on smear layer removal.

Objectives:

The aim of this study is to determine which irrigant effectively removes the smear layer from the coronal, middle, and apical third of the root canal.

Materials and Methodology:

One hundred and twenty single-rooted mandibular premolars were decoronated and biomechanical preparation was done through hand instrumentation up to size 40 k file with 2.5% NaOCl irrigation between each successive filing, followed by irrigation with 5 ml of saline. The teeth were divided into Groups I, II, III, and IV containing 30 samples each and irrigated with 5 ml of 17% ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA), 10% Citric acid, 7% Maleic acid and normal saline respectively for 1 min and final irrigation was done with 5 ml of distilled water of each sample. The canals were dried with 2% absorbent paper points. The roots were then split with a chisel and mallet. One-half of each tooth was selected and then was analyzed using a scanning electron microscope. The dentinal surfaces were observed at the cervical, middle, and apical third with ×2000 for the smear layer. The scores were attributed, according to Torabinejad et al. rating system.

Results:

7% maleic acid and 10% citric acid both are equally effective in smear layer removal from coronal and middle third, but in apical third 7% maleic acid is more effective than 10% citric acid. Between citric acid and EDTA, both are equally effective in smear layer removal from coronal and middle third, but in apical third, 10% citric acid is more efficacious than 17% EDTA.

Conclusion:

Within the limitations of the study, it can be concluded that all three tested irrigants removed the smear layer from coronal, middle, and apical third. However, in apical third 7% maleic acid is the most efficacious irrigant in smear layer removal.

Unravelling the effects of the food components ascorbic acid and capsaicin as a novel anti-biofilm agent against Escherichia coli

This study aimed to evaluate the influence of capsaicin and ascorbic acid on the physiology of biofilm formation and dispersion. The influence of the E. coli ATCC 25922 biofilm and five E. coli isolates were observed in the presence of sodium hypochlorite 2.5 mM and subinhibitory concentrations of capsaicin (7 mM) and ascorbic acid (100 mM). The cells counts were performed through standard plaque count and the architecture visualized by confocal microscopy. The proteins, carbohydrates, and DNA present in the biofilm matrix were also quantified. There was a reduction in adhered cells in the presence of capsaicin (7 mM) and ascorbic acid (100 mM) in the biofilm formation kinetics, however, regarding the dispersion, only capsaicin altered the biofilm, data confirmed by confocal fluorescence microscopy (p < 0.05). It was noted that the matrix composition is dynamic and may be affected by changes in growth conditions such as the presence of antimicrobial substances.