Long-term and short-term outcomes after laparoscopic versus open surgery for advanced gastric cancer: An updated meta-analysis

Association of Laparoscopic Approach With Improved Short-Term Outcomes in Patients With Hematologic Malignancy Undergoing Splenectomy

BACKGROUND

Patients with hematologic malignancies undergo splenectomy for both diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. Although minimally invasive surgery continues to be increasingly utilized for a variety of abdominal operations, no large-scale data has compared the postoperative outcomes for laparoscopic vs open splenectomy in patients with hematologic malignancy.

METHODS

Patients with a diagnosis of hematologic malignancy who underwent laparoscopic and open splenectomy between 2015 and 2020 were queried using the ACS-NSQIP database. 30-day outcomes of laparoscopic vs open splenectomy were compared.

RESULTS

Out of 430 patients included in the study, 52.6% were male, with a mean age of 63.4 ± 13.1 years. 233 patients (54.2%) underwent laparoscopic splenectomy. On bivariate analysis, laparoscopic surgery was associated with lower rates of 30-day mortality [2.1% vs 11.7% (P < .001)] and morbidity [9.0% vs 24.4% (P < .001)]. On multivariate regression, elective operations (OR .255, 95%CI: 0.084-.778, P = .016) and laparoscopic surgery (OR .239, 95%CI: 0.075-.760, P = .015) were independently associated with lower mortality, while history of metastatic cancer (OR 3.331, 95%CI: 1.144-9.699, P = .027) was associated with higher mortality. Laparoscopic surgery (OR .401, 95%CI: 0.209-.770, P = .006) and steroid use (OR 2.714, 95%CI: 1.279-5.757, P = .009) were the only two factors independently associated with 30-day morbidity. Laparoscopic surgery was also associated with shorter hospital length of stay (median 3 [IQR:3] vs 6 [IQR:7] days).

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic splenectomy was associated with lower 30-day mortality and morbidity, and shorter length of stay in patients with hematologic malignancies. These data suggest that laparoscopic approach, when feasible, may be preferred for splenectomy in this patient population.

Cost-effectiveness of first-line immunotherapy combinations with or without chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a modelling approach

BACKGROUND

Many studies have explored the cost-effectiveness of immunotherapy versus chemotherapy alone. However, there is paucity of evidence on direct pharmacoeconomic studies related to immunotherapy combinations. Thus, we aimed at assessing the economic outcomes of first-line immunotherapy combinations in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) from the Chinese health care perspective.

METHODS

The mutual hazard ratios (HRs) of ten immunotherapy combinations and one chemotherapy regimen for the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were obtained from a network meta-analysis. Based on proportional hazard (PH) assumption, adjusted OS and PFS curves were established to make the effects comparable. With the parameters of cost and utility, and of scale and shape from the fit of adjusted OS and PFS curves obtained from previous studies, a partitioned survival model was designed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of immunotherapy combinations versus chemotherapy alone. Parameter uncertainty in model inputs was assessed using one-way deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses.

RESULTS

The incremental cost of camrelizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone was $13,180.65, the lowest among all the other immunotherapy combinations. Furthermore, sintilimab plus chemotherapy (sint-chemo) provided the highest quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) benefit versus chemotherapy alone (incremental QALYs = 0.45). Sint-chemo yielded the best incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) versus chemotherapy alone (ICER = $34,912.09/QALY), at the current price. The cost-effectiveness probabilities were 32.01% and 93.91% for pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy, and atezolizumab plus bevacizumab plus chemotherapy, respectively (if the original price of the pembrolizumab, atezolizumab, and bevacizumab were decreased by 90%).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the fact that there is fierce competition in the PD-1/PD-L1 market, pharmaceutical enterprises should strive for greater efficacy, and optimal pricing strategy for therapies.

Laparoscopic and open gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer: a retrospective analysis in Colombia

INTRODUCTION

Radical gastrectomy has traditionally been the pillar treatment with curative intent for malignant tumors of the stomach. The safety of the laparoscopic approach for advanced gastric cancer (AGC) is still under debate. In our institution, laparoscopic gastrectomy is the most performed approach.

OBJECTIVE

Our aim is to describe the experience of a high-volume center in the treatment of AGC in Colombia and to analyze the short-term results and the overall survival rate at 1, 3, and 5 years comparing the open and laparoscopic approaches.

METHODS

A cross-sectional retrospective study of patients who underwent gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer by open or laparoscopic approaches were performed. A Will-Coxon Mann Whitney test was performed in terms of lymph node status and surgical approach. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method for overall survival at 1, 3, and 5 years. An initial log-rank test was performed to test the relationships between the operative variables and overall survival, the statistical value was accepted if p < 0.20. Data with an initial statistical relationship in the log-rank test were included in a secondary analysis using multivariate Cox proportional regression, variables with a value of p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

310 patients met the inclusion criteria. 89% underwent laparoscopic gastrectomy and 10.9% open gastrectomy. The resection margins were negative at 93.5% and the In terms of lymph node dissection, the median lymph nodes extracted was 20 (12;37), with statistically significant differences between the approaches in favor of the laparoscopic approach (Median 21 vs 12; z = - 2.19, p = 0.02). The survival rate was at 1, 3, and 5 years of 84.04%, 66.9%, and 65.47% respectively. The presence of complications and the ICU requirement have a negative impact on survival at 1 year (p 0.00).

CONCLUSION

A laparoscopic approach is safe with acceptable morbidity and mortality rates for treating gastric cancer. D2 Lymphadenectomy could be performed successfully in a laparoscopic approach in a high-volume center and a properly standardized technique. Major postoperative morbidity with intensive care unit requirement seems to influence overall survival rates.

Laparoscopic vs. open distal gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Objective

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to compare the short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG) with those of open distal gastrectomy (ODG) for patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC) who exclusively underwent distal gastrectomy and D2 lymphadenectomy in randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

Background

Data in published meta-analyses that included different gastrectomy types and mixed tumor stages prevented an accurate comparison between LDG and ODG. Recently, several RCTs that compared LDG with ODG included AGC patients specifically for distal gastrectomy, with D2 lymphadenectomy being reported and updated with the long-term outcomes.

Methods

PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched to identify RCTs for comparing LDG with ODG for advanced distal gastric cancer. Short-term surgical outcomes and mortality, morbidity, and long-term survival were compared. The Cochrane tool and GRADE approach were used for evaluating the quality of evidence (Prospero registration ID: CRD42022301155).

Results

Five RCTs consisting of a total of 2,746 patients were included. Meta-analyses showed no significant differences in terms of intraoperative complications, overall morbidity, severe postoperative complications, R0 resection, D2 lymphadenectomy, recurrence, 3-year disease-free survival, intraoperative blood transfusion, time to first liquid diet, time to first ambulation, distal margin, reoperation, mortality, or readmission between LDG and ODG. Operative times were significantly longer for LDG [weighted mean difference (WMD) 49.2 min, p < 0.05], whereas harvested lymph nodes, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, time to first flatus, and proximal margin were lower for LDG (WMD -1.3, p < 0.05; WMD -33.6 mL, p < 0.05; WMD -0.7 day, p < 0.05; WMD -0.2 day, p < 0.05; WMD -0.4 mm, p < 0.05). Intra-abdominal fluid collection and bleeding were found to be less after LDG. Certainty of evidence ranged from moderate to very low.

Conclusions

Data from five RCTs suggest that LDG with D2 lymphadenectomy for AGC has similar short-term surgical outcomes and long-term survival to ODG when performed by experienced surgeons in hospitals contending with high patient volumes. It can be concluded that RCTs should highlight the potential advantages of LDG for AGC.

Systematic Review Registration

PROSPERO, registration number CRD42022301155.

Laparoscopic D2 radical gastrectomy improves postoperative inflammation and gastric function in elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of laparoscopic radical gastrectomy on the inflammation and recovery of gastrointestinal function in elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer (GC).

METHODS

Data of 80 elderly patients with advanced GC admitted to the Taizhou First people's Hospital from May 2014 to January 2019 were collected for this retrospective analysis. Among them, 34 patients underwent open D2 radical gastrectomy were regarded as control group. The other 46 patients underwent laparoscopic D2 radical gastrectomy were considered as observation group. Both groups underwent 2/3 or more mid-segment gastrectomy with D2 regional lymphatic dissection. The operative time, intraoperative bleeding, postoperative ventilation time, length of stay (LOS) and perioperative complication rates were compared between the two groups. Peripheral blood was drawn before and after surgery to detect the inflammatory factors C-reactive protein (CRP), calcitoninogen (PCT), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), gastric function gastrin 17 (G-17), and pepsinogen (PG) I and II. Subsequently, patients were followed up for 3-year prognosis to document the survival of patients.

RESULTS

The operative time and LOS were shorter and intraoperative bleeding was lower in the observation group than those in the control group (P<0.05). There was no statistical difference in treatment costs and incidence of perioperative complications between the two groups (P>0.05). After surgery, CRP, PCT and TNF-α were elevated in both groups but were lower in the observation group than that in the control group (P<0.05). PG I was dramatically higher (P<0.05), while PG II and G-17 were lower (P<0.05) in both groups after treatment. Also, the posttreatment PG I and G-17 were higher (P<0.05) and PG II was lower (P<0.05) in the observation group than those in the control group. Prognostic follow-up revealed no statistical difference between groups in terms of the 1-year and 3-year overall survival (P>0.05).

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic D2 radical surgery is more effective in the treatment of advanced GC in the elderly, because it can effectively suppress the postoperative inflammation and improve recovery of gastric function. Hence, it has a high clinical application value.

Open and minimally invasive gastrectomy in Eastern and Western patient populations: A review of the literature and reasons for differences in outcomes

Randomized trials in the East have established minimally invasive gastrectomy as possibly superior for short-term outcomes and noninferior for long-term survival. Smaller randomized studies from Western countries have supported these findings. However, there are marked disparities in morbidity, mortality, and overall survival noted between Eastern and Western studies. In this article, we review the literature comparing open and minimally invasive gastrectomy in the East and West, and describe the possible reasons for differences in outcomes.