Major and Minor Discordance in Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry Diagnosis of Osteoporosis - A Cross-Sectional, Population-Based, Observational Study in Indian Women

Sonographic Features of Rectus Femoris Muscle in Patients with Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Fatty Liver Disease and Their Correlation with Body Composition Parameters and Muscle Strength: Results of a Single-Center Cross-Sectional Study

This study aimed to describe sonographic features of rectus femoris muscle (RFM) in patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MASLD) and their correlation with body composition parameters and muscle strength. A total of 67 patients with MASLD underwent dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA), bioimpedance analysis (BIA), muscle strength measurement (grip strength [GS] and chair stand test [CST]), and ultrasound (US) investigation of the RFM in the dominant thigh using a 4 to 18 MHz linear probe. MASLD patients exhibited increased RFM echogenicity, possibly due to fatty infiltration. We confirmed that the greater the subcutaneous fat thickness, the smaller was the muscle mass (p < 0.001), and the lower was the muscle strength (p < 0.001 for GS and p = 0.002 for CST). On the contrary, the greater the anteroposterior diameter (APD) of RFM, the higher was the muscle mass (p < 0.001), and the greater was the muscle strength (p < 0.001 for GS and p = 0.007 for CST). In addition, APD of the RFM and stiffness of RFM exhibited direct correlation with bone mineral density values of the lumbar spine (p = 0.005 for both GS and CST). We concluded that US investigation of the RFM in the dominant thigh can be helpful in identifying MASLD patients at a high risk of musculoskeletal disorders given repeated point-of-care clinical evaluations.

Prevalence of discordance between femoral and lumbar bone mineral density among older adults in a community-based setting

BACKGROUND

T-score measurement via dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the gold standard for assessing and classifying the bone mineral density status of patients as normal, osteopenic, or osteoporotic according to the World Health Organization criteria. However, the diagnostic accuracy may be affected by the skeletal site selected for DXA.

OBJECTIVES

Estimate the prevalence of femoral and lumbar BMD discordance in a community-based setting in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional.

SETTING

Polyclinics at a tertiary care center.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study included all patients aged ≥60 years who visited the Department of Family Medicine and underwent DXA screening between 2016 and 2022.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Discordance was defined as a difference in BMD status between two skeletal sites. Minor discordance occurs when adjacent sites have different diagnoses; i.e., one site exhibits osteoporosis and the other exhibits osteopenia. In contrast, major discordance occurs when one site exhibits osteoporosis and the other exhibits normal BMD.

SAMPLE SIZE

1429 older adults.

RESULTS

The study patients had a median age of 66 years (60-99, minimum-maximum). The prevalence of discordance was 41.6%, with major discordance present in 2.2% of patients and minor discordance in 39.4%. The distribution of discordance did not differ significantly among the sociodemographic factors.

CONCLUSION

Discordance is prevalent among the Saudi geriatric population. During the analysis of DXA results, physicians should account for discordance when diagnosing and ruling out osteoporosis in high-risk patients.

LIMITATIONS

All factors influencing discordance were not explored thoroughly; this study mainly focused on older adults. Furthermore, diverse age groups need to be investigated for a more comprehensive understanding of the analyzed factors.

Prevalence and Risk Factors of Discordance Between Hip and Spinal Bone Mineral Density Among Saudi Subjects

Background

Discordance between hip and spine on dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry is a well-known problem in diagnosing osteoporosis. The prevalence and risk factors of this problem have not been studied in the Saudi population. The objective of this study was to document this discordance in our population and its possible risk factors.

Materials and methods

We analyzed data obtained from subjects who had dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) between January 2021 and December 2021 at King Khalid University Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Subjects with the following conditions were excluded: secondary osteoporosis, patients taking anti-osteoporotic agents, patients on steroids or hormonal replacement therapy, hyperparathyroidism, hypoparathyroidism, and chronic renal disease. A total of 1388 patients satisfied our inclusion criteria. World Health Organization (WHO) criteria for diagnosis were implemented. Major discordance was defined as osteoporosis in one site and normal in the other. Minor discordance was defined as a difference of no more than one World Health Organization diagnostic class between two sites. Bivariate statistical analysis was achieved using appropriate statistical tests (chi-square, student’s t-test, one-way analysis of variance, and Pearson’s correlation), based on the type of study and outcome variables. A p-value of < 0.05 and 95% CI were used to report the statistical significance and precision of results.

Results

A total of 1388 subjects were analyzed, of which, 1196 (86%) were females with a mean age of 58.8 (13.8 SD) and 192 were males with a mean age of 58 (18.0 SD). Lumbar osteoporosis was found in 312 (22.5%) participants while hip osteoporosis was reported in 73 (5.3%) of the participants. Major discordance was documented in 85 (6.1%) of all participants (6.3% of the male and 6.1% of the female patients). All of these subjects had lumbar spine osteoporosis with normal hip bone mineral density (BMD). Minor discordance was found in 591 patients (42.6%). Obesity (BMI > 30) was found to be a risk factor for both major (2.10-11.6, 95% CI) and minor (2.5-11.4, 95% CI) discordance.

Conclusion

Discordance between hip and spine BMD is common among Saudi subjects. Lumbar spine osteoporosis with normal hip BMD caused this discordance in our subjects. Obesity could be responsible for the occurrence of this discordance. Mechanisms may include higher rate of turnover in spine, technical artifacts in the measurements of lumbar spine BMD, or due to the effects of weight loading. Caution should be exercised when interpreting DXA results, especially in obese subjects.