Screening tools for osteoporosis in India: Where do we place them in current clinical care?

CircZNF367 promotes osteoclast differentiation and osteoporosis by interacting with FUS to maintain CRY2 mRNA stability

BACKGROUND

Osteoporosis, characterized by reduced bone mass and deterioration of bone quality, is a significant health concern for postmenopausal women. Considering that the specific role of circRNAs in osteoporosis and osteoclast differentiation remains poorly understood, this study aims to shed light on their involvement in these processes to enhance our understanding and potentially contribute to improved treatment strategies for osteoporosis.

METHODS

An osteoporotic model was constructed in vivo in ovariectomized mouse. In vitro, we induced osteoclast formation in bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs) using M-CSF + RANKL. To assess osteoporosis in mice, we conducted HE staining. We used MTT and TRAP staining to measure cell viability and osteoclast formation, respectively, and also evaluated their mRNA and protein expression levels. In addition, RNA pull-down, RIP and luciferase reporter assays were performed to investigate interactions, and ChIP assay was used to examine the impact of circZNF367 knockdown on the binding between FUS and CRY2.

RESULTS

We observed increased expression of CircZNF367, FUS and CRY2 in osteoporotic mice and M-CSF + RANKL-induced BMDMs. Functionally, knocking down circZNF367 inhibited osteoporosis in vivo. Furthermore, interference with circZNF367 suppressed osteoclast proliferation and the expression of TRAP, NFATc1, and c-FOS. Mechanistically, circZNF367 interacted with FUS to maintain CRY2 mRNA stability. Additionally, knocking down CRY2 rescued M-CSF + RANKL-induced osteoclast differentiation in BMDMs promoted by circZNF367 and FUS.

CONCLUSION

This study reveals that the circZNF367/FUS axis may accelerate osteoclasts differentiation by upregulating CRY2 in osteoporosis and suggests that targeting circZNF367 may have potential therapeutic effects on osteoporosis.

Metabolome-Wide Mendelian Randomization Assessing the Causal Relationship Between Blood Metabolites and Bone Mineral Density

Mounting evidence has supported osteoporosis (OP) as a metabolic disorder. Recent metabolomics studies have discovered numerous metabolites related to bone mineral density (BMD). However, the causal effects of metabolites on BMD at distinct sites remained underexplored. Leveraging genome-wide association datasets, we conducted two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses to investigate the causal relationship between 486 blood metabolites and bone mineral density at five skeletal sites including heel (H), total body (TB), lumbar spine (LS), femoral neck (FN), and ultra-distal forearm (FA). Sensitivity analyses were performed to test the presence of the heterogeneity and the pleiotropy. To exclude the influences of reverse causation, genetic correlation, and linkage disequilibrium (LD), we further performed reverse MR, linkage disequilibrium regression score (LDSC), and colocalization analyses. In the primary MR analyses, 22, 10, 3, 7, and 2 metabolite associations were established respectively for H-BMD, TB-BMD, LS-BMD, FN-BMD, and FA-BMD at the nominal significance level (IVW, P < 0.05) and passing sensitivity analyses. Among these, one metabolite, androsterone sulfate showed a strong effect on four out of five BMD phenotypes (Odds ratio [OR] for H-BMD = 1.045 [1.020, 1.071]; Odds ratio [OR] for TB-BMD = 1.061 [1.017, 1.107]; Odds ratio [OR] for LS-BMD = 1.088 [1.023, 1.159]; Odds ratio [OR] for FN-BMD = 1.114 [1.054, 1.177]). Reverse MR analysis provided no evidence for the causal effects of BMD measurements on these metabolites. Colocalization analysis have found that several metabolite associations might be driven by shared genetic variants such as mannose for TB-BMD. This study identified some metabolites causally related to BMD at distinct sites and several key metabolic pathways, which shed light on predictive biomarkers and drug targets for OP.

Osteoporosis Screening and Fracture Risk Assessment Tool: Its Scope and Role in General Clinical Practice

Osteoporosis is a widely prevalent condition among postmenopausal women characterized by low bone mass and skeletal fragility that increases the risk of fractures specifically in the hip, spine, wrist, humerus, and pelvis. It has become a major public health problem around the world. An osteoporotic fracture affects one in every three women and one in every five men aged 50 and above. Hip and spine fractures are linked to a higher death rate and can cause ambulation problems, depression, chronic pain, independence loss, and persistent discomfort. It not only puts a lot of strain on the individual but also causes a significant cost to society. Osteoporosis is a silent disease that goes unrecognized until a patient develops a pathological fracture. Diagnosis of osteoporosis is based on bone mineral density (BMD) estimation by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) as defined by WHO. However, in many resource-constrained and underdeveloped or low-middle income countries, it is not widely available. There are a number of questionnaire-based techniques available to identify such postmenopausal women and older men who may be at risk of having low BMD and osteoporosis. Our aim of the study is to search and compile such simple yet useful and validated screening and assessment tools for osteoporosis that can help to identify people at risk of having low BMD and the potential candidate who can benefit from BMD estimation in a resource-restricted geographical area or low/middle-income countries and benefit from treatment. Though these tools are not diagnostic can have broader applicability in general clinical practice and usefulness in identifying high-risk individuals and may prove cost-effective. Although it has limitations, FRAX is a widely used osteoporotic fracture risk assessment tool around the globe and when used with femoral neck BMD it has greater accuracy.